‘수인의 채무자 있는 채권관계’의 이해에 대한 비판적 검토
A Critical Analysis of the Traditional Theory on the Legal Relation of Plurality of Debtors
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Korean civil code knows two types of co-debtor: solidarity obligation similiar to joint and several liability in english civil law and indivisible obligation, in addition to which improper solidarity obligation is also acknowledged as a kind of co-debtor by the civil law jurisprudence. This article criticizes the majority of the tradional civil law jurisprudence on the solidarity obligation, which has considered the discharging effect a material alteration(a novatio), release, confusion and so on have in relation to another joint debtors as weakening the suretyship purpose and which has made a sharp critic against these-related rules of korean civil code as a legislation not reflecting the suretyship function of joint debtors. But this article estimates many relevant korean civil code rules as respecting legitimate interests of joint debtors, on the contrary to the traditional theory insisting some rules related to fostering suretyship function overestimate the interest of creditor against general civil law principles. Through the analysis of the traditional theory on the figure “co-debtor”, this article aims to reconstruct the legal relation of plurality of debtors.
Abstract
Korean civil code knows two types of co-debtor: solidarity obligation similiar to joint and several liability in english civil law and indivisible obligation, in addition to which improper solidarity obligation is also acknowledged as a kind of co-debtor by the civil law jurisprudence. This article criticizes the majority of the tradional civil law jurisprudence on the solidarity obligation, which has considered the discharging effect a material alteration(a novatio), release, confusion and so on have in relation to another joint debtors as weakening the suretyship purpose and which has made a sharp critic against these-related rules of korean civil code as a legislation not reflecting the suretyship function of joint debtors. But this article estimates many relevant korean civil code rules as respecting legitimate interests of joint debtors, on the contrary to the traditional theory insisting some rules related to fostering suretyship function overestimate the interest of creditor against general civil law principles. Through the analysis of the traditional theory on the figure “co-debtor”, this article aims to reconstruct the legal relation of plurality of debtors.
참고문헌 (29)
- 곽윤직, "채권총론" (1999), 박영사
- 곽윤직, "민법주해 X" (1995), 박영사
- 곽윤직, "민법주해 XⅥ" (1997), 박영사
- 김형배, "채권총론" (1998), 박영사
- 민의원 법제사법위원회, "민법안심의록 상권", ~
- 박준서, "주석 민법 채권총칙(2)" (2000), 한국사법행정학회
- 박철, "공동명의예금과 다수당사자채권관계의 법리", 민사판례연구 XXⅣ
- 이은영, "채권총론(제3판)", 박영사
- 제철웅, "부분구상과 전부구상의 구별기준, 민사판례연구 XXⅥ", 박영사
- 제철웅, "보증채무 및 연대채무에서의 구상권 상실: 비교법적 검토를 통한 새로운 해석가능성의 모색", 비교사법, 9(1)
- "code civil de l’empire du japon accompagne d’un expose des motifs Tome premier texte, Livre des biens, libre des gagantiers des creances", ~ (1891)
- Ehmann, "Die Gesamtschuld", ~ (1972)
- Entwurf eines, "b?gerlichen Gesetzbuchs f? das K?igreich Bayern 1861-1864 mit Motiven" (1973), Neudruck
- Ferid, "Das Franz?ische Zivilrecht" (1971), Bd.I
- Flume, "Allgemeiner Teil des b?gerlichen Rechts" (1977), Bd. I, 1. Teil
- Gernhuber, Joachim, "Die Erf?lung und ihre Surrogate", ~ (1983)
- Mestre, Jacques, "Contrats et obligations; Obligations conjointes et solidaires" (1995), Juris Classeur Civil
- M?chener Kommentar, "zum B?gerliches Gesetzbuch; Bd. 2, 4. Aufl., 2001", ~ (2001)
- Philippe Simler, "Droit civil: les s?et?", ~ (2000)
- Selb, "Mehrheiten von Gl?bigern und Schuldern, 1984", ~ (1984)
- Soergel, "Hans Theodor(Begr.):B?gerliches Gesetzbuch mit Einf?rungsgesetz und Nebengesetz; Bd.2", ~ (1990)
- Staudinger, "Kommentar zum B?gerlichen Gesetzbuch mit Einf?rungsgesetz und Nebengesetz; Zweites Buch, Recht der Schuldverh?tnisse ㎣ 362-396, 13. Aufl., 1995; Zweites Buch, Recht der Schuldverh?tnisse ㎣ 397-432, 13. Aufl., 1999", 362~396 (1999)
- Windscheid, "des Pandektensrechts, Bd. II. 9.Aufl., 1906", ~ (1906)
- ? 正美, "史料 債權總則(15)", 民商法雜誌, 84(2) (1981)
- 高橋 眞, "史料 債權總則(16)", 民商法雜誌, 84(3) (1981)
- 高橋 眞, "史料 債權總則(17)", 民商法雜誌, 84(4) (1981)
- 西村信雄 編輯, "注釋民法(11) 債權 (2)", 昭和, 40
- 我妻榮, "新訂 債權總論", 昭和, 49
- 淡路剛久, "連帶債務の一體性と相互保證性", 民法の爭點