키코 계약의 소비자 계약성
Introducing Consumer Contractship into KIKO Contracts
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
KIKO contract system, introduced as one of derivatives options to hedge foreign exchange risks in Korea, has never failed to draw conflicts regarding its inherent unfairness and fraudulence, continuously producing legal suits between banks and businesses and volatile controversy among courts, supervisory authorities, and academic circles. KIKO contract was a chief derivatives option that was rapidly widely traded in 2006-2007, when the exchange rate was falling stably. But as the deteriorating financial crisis and the Government's exchange rate policy affected the rate against US dollars to reverse its trend to rise sharply, smalland medium-sized exporting businesses that had KIKO contracts had to suffer great losses since they had to sell their dollars from the export payment at the rate designated in the contract with their KIKO banks. This paper suggests to solve legal conflicts surrounding KIKO contract from the consumer's view; for businesses, the consumer, may have purchased the contracts impulsively without being fully aware of the complicated and risky nature of KIKO as derivatives, and also businesses in the contract are apparently and asymmetrically less competitive in terms of economic power and information than their counterpart banks. Issues in legal KIKO suits have been if KIKO contracts should be interpreted by the contract terms, if the contract was unfair, if the contract could be terminated according to the changes in circumstance rule, if the contract was of error or fraud, if the contract could lead to fraud charge, if suitability or explanation liabilities were satisfied, etc. This paper suggests the KIKO suits be handled and examined through the consumer protection law in addition to the private and criminal laws, noticing most KIKO contract buyers are small- and medium-sized exporting businesses and identifying them as consumers. Fairness and effectiveness will be enhanced in solving legal KIKO conflicts in those issues mentioned if the KIKO problem is handled through the consumer protection law and is viewed further through consumerism
Abstract
KIKO contract system, introduced as one of derivatives options to hedge foreign exchange risks in Korea, has never failed to draw conflicts regarding its inherent unfairness and fraudulence, continuously producing legal suits between banks and businesses and volatile controversy among courts, supervisory authorities, and academic circles. KIKO contract was a chief derivatives option that was rapidly widely traded in 2006-2007, when the exchange rate was falling stably. But as the deteriorating financial crisis and the Government's exchange rate policy affected the rate against US dollars to reverse its trend to rise sharply, smalland medium-sized exporting businesses that had KIKO contracts had to suffer great losses since they had to sell their dollars from the export payment at the rate designated in the contract with their KIKO banks. This paper suggests to solve legal conflicts surrounding KIKO contract from the consumer's view; for businesses, the consumer, may have purchased the contracts impulsively without being fully aware of the complicated and risky nature of KIKO as derivatives, and also businesses in the contract are apparently and asymmetrically less competitive in terms of economic power and information than their counterpart banks. Issues in legal KIKO suits have been if KIKO contracts should be interpreted by the contract terms, if the contract was unfair, if the contract could be terminated according to the changes in circumstance rule, if the contract was of error or fraud, if the contract could lead to fraud charge, if suitability or explanation liabilities were satisfied, etc. This paper suggests the KIKO suits be handled and examined through the consumer protection law in addition to the private and criminal laws, noticing most KIKO contract buyers are small- and medium-sized exporting businesses and identifying them as consumers. Fairness and effectiveness will be enhanced in solving legal KIKO conflicts in those issues mentioned if the KIKO problem is handled through the consumer protection law and is viewed further through consumerism
참고문헌 (22)
- 김건식, "자본시장법" (2009), 두성사
- 김병연, "증권투자권유규제에 대한 소고 - 자본시장통합법(안)과 관련하여 -", 비교사법, 14(1), pp.471~500 (2007), 한국비교사법학회
- 김병연, "금융소비자 보호를 위한 금융회사의 경영체제 개선 방향", 주간금융브리프, 19(27) (2010), 금융연구원
- 김형배, "민법학강의" (2009), 신조사
- 안수현, "(가칭)자본시장통합법과 소비자보호법의 접점 - ‘금융소비자의 보호’", 증권법연구, 7(2), pp.199~248 (2006), 한국증권법학회
- 이금호, "신용파생금융거래의 종류 및 법적 문제", 증권법연구, 9(2), pp.185~225 (2008), 한국증권법학회
- 이금호, "파생금융거래 관련 법적 이슈 검토", 경영법률, 14(2), pp.207~230 (2004), 한국경영법률학회
- 정보근, "키코(KIKO)와 금융소비자보호법", 2010.4.12자(제3832호) 법률신문, ~ (2010)
- 정상근, "KIKO의 法律的規制硏究 —국내판매은행의 民事責任과 외국투자은행의 刑事責任을 중심으로—", 금융법연구, 5(2), pp.95~119 (2008), 한국금융법학회
- 정준우, "證券業者의 不當한 投資勸誘行爲의 合理的 規制方案", 비교사법, 11(3), pp.427~460 (2004), 한국비교사법학회
- 최승재, "금융시장에서의 금융소비자의 행동양태를 고려한 투자자보호규범의 설계에 대한 연구 ―소위"행동경제학"적 관점을 반영하여", 증권법연구, 9(2), pp.227~270 (2008), 한국증권법학회
- 최승재, "고객보호의무법리에 대한 연구", 증권법연구, 11(1), pp.1~41 (2010), 한국증권법학회
- 한병영, "투자권유규제 규범과 사기금지 규범의 연결 규제", 증권법연구, 11(2), pp.83~133 (2010), 한국증권법학회
- 금융감독원, "파생결합 금융상품관련 감독 및 업무처리기준", ~ (2006)
- 금융투자협회, "장외파생상품심의위원회 운영 및 심의에 관한 규정", ~ (2010)
- 농협경제연구소, "통화옵션상품 ‘키코사태’의 현황분석 및 시사점", NHERI리포트, (69) (2009)
- "한겨레신문사, 「한겨례21」제732호, “은행 접대에 취해 키코 폭탄 마셨어요”,2008.10.24", ~ (2008)
- "Darrell Duffie, Ada Li, and Theo Lubke, “Policy Perspectives on OTC Derivatives Market Infrastructure”, Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports, no.424, March 2010"[URL]
- Keith Noyes, "“KIKO” Cases: Misconceptions and Undesirable LegalPrecedents" (2009), ISDA
- "Tim Barron, “The Application of Derivative Instruments in Pension Plan Management”, p.2(Source: Chicago Mercantile Exchange)"[URL]
