본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

상법의 관점에서 바라본 민법개정안의 법인제도

Reviewing the Juristic Persons System under the Draft Bill of the Korean Civil Law from the Viewpoint of the Korean Commercial Law

0

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

The Committee on the Amendment of Korean Civil Law, which is affiliated to the Ministry of Justice, announced in June 2010 the draft bill to amend the Juristic Persons System of the Korean Civil Code. One of the most important changes in the draft bill of 2010 is the introduction of the approbation system into the incorporation of a non-profit juristic person. Currently, a non-profit association may be formed as a juristic person subject to the authorization of the competent authorities. The draft bill of 2010 proposes that a non-profit organization be formed as a juristic person only subject to the approbation of the competent authorities. The Korean Civil Code § 39 provides that an association which aims at profit-making may be a juristic person in accordance with the conditions prescribed for the formation of trading companies. This section should be abolished, because a profit-making association currently may be formed as a business company with a juristic personality according to the Korean Commercial Code. The draft bill of 2010 introduces a new § 39-2, which provides that most provisions for a juristic person should apply to an association without juristic personality. While the new section offers a different type of business entity,entrepreneurs would not select this business entity due to its legal uncertainty. Representative authorities of directors may be restricted only by the articles of incorporation under the draft bill of 2010. The ‘restriction’ placed on the representative authorities seems to refer to the restriction of ‘an extent’ as well as of ‘a manner’ of the power of representation. Under the current § 60 of the Korean Civil Code, if any restriction placed on the power of representation of any director is not registered, such restriction cannot be set up against a third person despite his acting in bad faith. Protecting a third person acting in bad faith, however, is not consistent with the core principle of Civil Law. Thus, § 60 should be amended in accordance with § 37 of the Korean Commercial Code, which provides that matters as required to be registered shall not be effective as to any third person acting in good faith without registering them. The draft bill of 2010 newly adopts the system of mergers and divisions of non-profit juristic persons. Most provisions concerning mergers and divisions seem to refer to the ones of the Korean Commercial Code, which shows the tendency of ‘commercialization of civil law.’

Abstract

The Committee on the Amendment of Korean Civil Law, which is affiliated to the Ministry of Justice, announced in June 2010 the draft bill to amend the Juristic Persons System of the Korean Civil Code. One of the most important changes in the draft bill of 2010 is the introduction of the approbation system into the incorporation of a non-profit juristic person. Currently, a non-profit association may be formed as a juristic person subject to the authorization of the competent authorities. The draft bill of 2010 proposes that a non-profit organization be formed as a juristic person only subject to the approbation of the competent authorities. The Korean Civil Code § 39 provides that an association which aims at profit-making may be a juristic person in accordance with the conditions prescribed for the formation of trading companies. This section should be abolished, because a profit-making association currently may be formed as a business company with a juristic personality according to the Korean Commercial Code. The draft bill of 2010 introduces a new § 39-2, which provides that most provisions for a juristic person should apply to an association without juristic personality. While the new section offers a different type of business entity,entrepreneurs would not select this business entity due to its legal uncertainty. Representative authorities of directors may be restricted only by the articles of incorporation under the draft bill of 2010. The ‘restriction’ placed on the representative authorities seems to refer to the restriction of ‘an extent’ as well as of ‘a manner’ of the power of representation. Under the current § 60 of the Korean Civil Code, if any restriction placed on the power of representation of any director is not registered, such restriction cannot be set up against a third person despite his acting in bad faith. Protecting a third person acting in bad faith, however, is not consistent with the core principle of Civil Law. Thus, § 60 should be amended in accordance with § 37 of the Korean Commercial Code, which provides that matters as required to be registered shall not be effective as to any third person acting in good faith without registering them. The draft bill of 2010 newly adopts the system of mergers and divisions of non-profit juristic persons. Most provisions concerning mergers and divisions seem to refer to the ones of the Korean Commercial Code, which shows the tendency of ‘commercialization of civil law.’

참고문헌 (26)

  1. 강태성, "민법총칙편 제3장(법인) 제1절(총칙)과 제2절(설립)에 관한 개정방향", 민사법학, (35), pp.3~40 (2007), 한국민사법학회
  2. 강태성, "법인에 관한 민법개정방향", 법조, 538 (2001)
  3. 강태성, "사원총회에 관한 민법총칙의 개정방향", 법조, 57(5), pp.5~38 (2008), 법조협회
  4. 김교창, "민법 중 법인의 장에 관한 개정의견", 인권과 정의, 373 (2007)
  5. 김대정, "“법인에 관한 민법개정위원회의 개정시안”, 「민법개정의 방향」", 한국민사법학회 2010년 하계학술대회 발표논문 (2010)
  6. 김상용, "민법총칙" (2009), 화산미디어
  7. 김주수, "민법총칙 제2판" (1988), 삼영사
  8. 김중곤, "비법인사단의 세법상 제문제", 사법논집, 33 (2001)
  9. 남기윤, "私法상 法人槪念의 새로운 構成 -새로운 法人理論의 提案", 저스티스, 70(70), pp.166~206 (2002), 한국법학원
  10. 남효순, "법인편의 개정방향 - 민법 제48조의 개정 및 제60조의 불개정에 대하여", 한국민사법학회 2010년 하계학술대회 발표논문 (2010)
  11. 박찬주, "法人 아닌 社團 및 財團에 대한 새로운 理解", 법학연구, 48(1), pp.819~866 (2007), 법학연구소
  12. 송덕수, "민법개정에 대한 민법개정안연구회의 의견", 민사법학, 43(1), pp.251~284 (2008), 한국민사법학회
  13. 송덕수, "신민법강의" (2010), 박영사
  14. 송호영, "비영리법인의 합병⋅분할에 관한 입법론적 연구", 민사법학, (47), pp.579~629 (2009), 한국민사법학회
  15. 양창수, "법인이사의 대표권 제한에 관한 약간의 문제", 민법연구, 1 (1991), 박영사
  16. 윤진수, "法人에 관한 民法改正案의 考察", 서울대학교 법학, 46(1), pp.65~99 (2005), 법학연구소
  17. 윤진수, "私法上의 團體와 憲法", 비교사법, 15(4), pp.1~69 (2008), 한국비교사법학회
  18. 윤철홍, "비영리법인설립시 인가요건에 관한 입법론적 검토", 한국민사법학회 2010년 하계학술대회 발표논문 (2010)
  19. 이철송, "商法上의 立法錯誤의 是正을 위한 연구(1)- 商法總則ㆍ商行爲編을 중심으로 -", 비교사법, 12(4), pp.1~25 (2005), 한국비교사법학회
  20. 이철송, "상법총칙ㆍ상행위" (2009), 박영사
  21. 이철송, "회사법강의" (2010), 박영사
  22. 정찬형, "상법강의(상)" (2009), 박영사
  23. 최기원, (1992), 박영사
  24. 최준선, "회사법" (2010), 삼영사
  25. 홍일표, "ㆍ총칙⑴," (1992), 박영사
  26. Reinier Kraakman, "The Anatomy of Corporate Law" (2004), Oxford University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)