본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Association between Metacognitive Listening Strategy Use and Listening Comprehension Problems among Malaysian ESL Students

Vahid Nimehchisalem|Seyedehsima Sadatmir|Narjes Karimi|Uranus Saadat
아시아테플 (AsiaTEFL (The Asian Association of Teachers of English As a Foreign Language))|2022.06|Journal of Asia TEFL|제19권 제2호|pp. 489-507

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

metacognitive listening strategieslistening comprehension problemscognitive process of listening

초록

Listening comprehension is a fundamental part of both L1 and L2 communication. One of the most problematic issues in research on listening comprehension is that the performance of the learners mostly includes mental procedures that are not directly noticeable. This study seeks to identify and describe the association of metacognitive listening strategy use of ESL students with different listening comprehension ability levels and comprehension problems based on the theory of the cognitive process of listening. The quantitative method was used in this research with the presentation of EDA (Explanatory Research Analysis). The listening section of the International English Language Testing System (IELTS) was conducted to identify listening comprehension ability levels among 135 ESL students. Listening Comprehension Problem Questionnaire (LCPQ) and Metacognitive Listening Strategy Questionnaire (MLSQ) were distributed to the participants after completing the test to examine their perceived listening comprehension problems and metacognitive listening strategy use. Results showed ESL students’ listening comprehension ability level is in contrast with their perceived listening comprehension problems. Moreover, some associations have been revealed between the participants’ metacognitive listening strategy use and listening comprehension ability levels. However, the mixed results suggest a more dynamic methodology to be used for further investigation of strategy use.

Abstract

Listening comprehension is a fundamental part of both L1 and L2 communication. One of the most problematic issues in research on listening comprehension is that the performance of the learners mostly includes mental procedures that are not directly noticeable. This study seeks to identify and describe the association of metacognitive listening strategy use of ESL students with different listening comprehension ability levels and comprehension problems based on the theory of the cognitive process of listening. The quantitative method was used in this research with the presentation of EDA (Explanatory Research Analysis). The listening section of the International English Language Testing System (IELTS) was conducted to identify listening comprehension ability levels among 135 ESL students. Listening Comprehension Problem Questionnaire (LCPQ) and Metacognitive Listening Strategy Questionnaire (MLSQ) were distributed to the participants after completing the test to examine their perceived listening comprehension problems and metacognitive listening strategy use. Results showed ESL students’ listening comprehension ability level is in contrast with their perceived listening comprehension problems. Moreover, some associations have been revealed between the participants’ metacognitive listening strategy use and listening comprehension ability levels. However, the mixed results suggest a more dynamic methodology to be used for further investigation of strategy use.

참고문헌 (66)

  1. Al-Alwan, A., "EFL learners’ listening comprehension and awareness of metacognitive sStrategies: How are they related?", International Education Studies, 6(9), pp.31~39 (2013)
  2. Anderson, J. R., "Cognitive psychology and its implications" (1995), Freeman
  3. Anderson, N. J., "Individual differences in strategy use in second language reading and testing", Modern Language Journal, 75, pp.460~472 (1991)
  4. "The role of metacognition in second language teaching and learning" (2002)[URL]
  5. Ary, D., "Introduction to research in education" (2002), Harcourt Brace College Publishers
  6. Baker, L., "Comprehension instruction: Research- based best practices", pp.77~95 (2002), Guilfort Press
  7. Baker, L., "Handbook of reading research", pp.353~394 (1984), Routledge
  8. Beyer, K. B., "Practical strategies for the teaching of thinking" (1987), Allyn & Bacon, Inc
  9. Brown, A. L., "Inducing strategic learning from texts by means of informed, self-control training", Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities, 2, pp.1~17 (1982)
  10. Brown, A. L., "Reading comprehension: From research to practice", pp.49~75 (1986), Lawrence Erlbaum
  11. Brown, H., "Principles of language learning" (2001), Longman
  12. Brown, H. D., "Principles of language learning and teaching" (1994), Prentice-Hall
  13. Carrier, P. L., "Improving high school English language learners’ second language listening through strategy instruction", Bilingual Research Journal, 27(3), pp.383~410 (2003)
  14. Carrol, J. B., "Human cognitive ability. A survey of factor analytic study" (1996), Cambridge University Press
  15. Chambers, G., "Listening: Why? How?", Language Learning Journal, 14, pp.23~27 (1996)
  16. Chamot, A. U., "Language learning strategy instruction: current issues and research", Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, pp.112~130 (2005)
  17. Chamot, A. U., "The learning strategies handbook" (1999), Longman
  18. Cohen, A. D., "Strategies in learning and using a second language" (1998), Longman
  19. Cohen, A. D., "Strategies in learning and using a second language" (2000), Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press
  20. Field, J., "Bricks or mortar: Which parts of the input does a second language listener rely on?", TESOL Quarterly, 42, pp.411~432 (2008)
  21. Flavell, J. H., "The nature of intelligence", pp.231~235 (1976), Lawrence Erlbaum
  22. Flavell, J. H., "Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry", RELC Journal, 23, pp.906~911 (1979)
  23. George, D. & Mallery, P., "SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update" (2003), Allyn & Bacon
  24. Goh, C. M., "Metacognitive instruction in listening for young learners", ELT Journal, 60, pp.222~232 (2006)
  25. Goh, C. M., "How ESL learners with different listening abilities use comprehension strategies and tactics", Language Teaching Research, 2(2), pp.124~147 (1998)
  26. Goh, C. M., "A cognitive perspective on language listening comprehension problems", System, 28(1), pp.55~75 (2000)
  27. Goh, C. M., "Exploring listening comprehension tactics and their interaction patterns", System, 30(2), pp.185~206 (2002)
  28. Goh, C. M., "Teaching listening in the language classroom" (2002), SEAMEO Regional Language Centre
  29. Graham, S., "Strategy instruction in listening for lower intermediate learners of French", Language Learning, 58(4), pp.747~783 (2008)
  30. Graham, S., "Listening comprehension: The learners’ perspective", System, 34, pp.165~182 (2006)
  31. Hauck, M., "CALL research perspectives", pp.65~86 (2005), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  32. Kohler, D. B., "The effects of metacognitive language learning strategy training on lowerachieving second language learners", 박사, pp.2002
  33. Lau, K. -L., "Strategy use, listening problems, and motivation of high- and low-proficiency Chinese listeners", The Journal of Educational Research, 110(5), pp.503~514 (2016)[DOI]
  34. Liu, N. F., "Processing problems in L2 listening comprehension of university students in Hong Kong", 박사, pp.2002
  35. Luo-xian, S., "Metacognitive awareness and second language listeners", Media in Foreign Language Instruction, 6, pp.55~59 (2005)
  36. Maleki, B., "The effect of cognitive and metacognitive strategies on improvement of different school subjects", New Findings in Cognitive Science, 7(3), pp.42~49 (2005)
  37. McGruddy, R., "The effect of listening comprehension strategy training with advanced level ESL students", 박사, pp.1995
  38. Mohammadali, M. S., "ESL learners listening performance under the impact of metacognitive strategies’ different subscales", Research Journal of Recent Sciences, 3(8), pp.32~37 (2014)
  39. Oxford, R. L., "Use of language learning strategies. A synthesis of studies with implications for strategy training", System, 17, pp.235~247 (1989)
  40. Ozeki, N., "Listening strategy instruction for female ESF college students in Japan", 박사, pp.2000
  41. O’Malley, J. M., "Listening comprehension strategies in second language acquisition", Applied Linguistics, 10(4), pp.418~437 (1989)
  42. O’Malley, J. M., "Learning strategy applications with students of English as a second language", TESOL Quarterly, 19(3), pp.557~584 (1985)
  43. Rahimi, M., "The relationship between listening self-efficacy and metacognitive awareness of listening strategies", Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, pp.1454~1460 (2014)
  44. Rahimi, M., "Metacognitive listening strategies awareness in learning English as a foreign language: A comparison between university and high-school students", Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, pp.82~89 (2011)
  45. Renzhi, Y., "Improving English listening self-efficacy of Chinese university students: Influences of learning strategy training with feedback on strategy use and performance", 박사, pp.2012
  46. Rubin, J., "Language learner self-management", Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 11(1), pp.25~37 (2001)
  47. Sadatmir, S., "Validation of ‘self-perception of ESL learners’ listening comprehension problems and metacognitive listening strategy use’ questionnaire", Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 9(6), pp.158~171 (2018)
  48. Noroozi, S., "Developing an instrument for Iranian EFL learners’ listening comprehension problems and listening strategies", Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 5(3), pp.63~69 (2014)
  49. ShiraniBidabadi, F., "The relationship between listening strategies used by Iranian EFL freshman university students and their listening proficiency levels", English Language Teaching, 4(1), pp.26~32 (2011)
  50. Taghizadeh, M., "The effects of metacognitive strategy training on the listening comprehension and self-regulation of EFL learners", Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 4(16), pp.37~54 (2016)
  51. Ummah, F., "The relationship between metacognitive listening strategy used by proficiency level and their listening comprehension for eleventh grade in SMA Negeri 1 Gresik", Journal of English Teaching, Literature, and Applied Linguistics, 3(2), pp.34~43 (2017)
  52. Van Aaken, S., "What motivates L2 learners in acquisition of Kanji using CALL: A case study", Computer Assisted Language Learning, 12, pp.113~135 (1999)
  53. Vandergrift, L., "The Cinderella of communication strategies: Reception strategies in interactive listening", The Modern Language Journal, 81(4), pp.494~505 (1997)
  54. Vandergrift, L., "Facilitating second language listening comprehension: Acquiring successful strategies", English Language Teaching Journal, 53(3), pp.168~176 (1999)
  55. Vandergrift, L., "From prediction to reflection: Guiding students through the process of L2 listening", Canadian Modern Language Review, 59, pp.425~440 (2003)
  56. Vandergrift, L., "Orchestrating strategy use: Towards a model of the skilled L2 listener", Language Learning, 53(3), pp.463~496 (2003)
  57. Vandergrift, L., "Relationships among motivation orientations: Metacognitive awareness and proficiency in L2 listening", Applied Linguistics, 26, pp.70~89 (2005)
  58. Vandergrift, L., "Second language listening: Listening ability or language proficiency?", The Modern Language Journal, 90, pp.6~18 (2006)
  59. Vandergrift, L., "Teaching L2 learners how to listen does make a difference: An empirical study", Language Learning, 60(2), pp.470~497 (2010)
  60. Vandergrift, L., "Teaching and learning second language listening" (2012), ESL & Applied Linguistics Professional Series
  61. Vandergrift. L., "The metacognitive awareness listening questionnaire (MLAQ): Development and validation", Language Learning, 56(3), pp.431~462 (2006)
  62. Wenden, A., "Learner strategies for learner autonomy" (1991), Prentice Hall
  63. Wenden, A., "Learner development in language learning", Applied Linguistics, 23(1), pp.32~55 (2002)
  64. Yang, C., "A study of metacognitive strategies employed by English listeners", International Education Studies, 2(4), pp.134~139 (2009)
  65. Zare, H., "The difference between weak and strong Payame Nour University students in their metacognitive knowledge and metacognitive strategies awareness", Nour Review, 3(2) (2004)
  66. Zheng, R. Z., "Effects of using hypermedia as an instructional intervention to improve ESL learners’ metacognition, motivation, and academic achievement", 박사, pp.1998

관련 논문AI추천

The Relationship between L2 Listeners’ Metacognitive Awareness of Listening Comprehension and Performance이진영외국어교육연구소 · 외국어교육연구2024 · 제38권 제2호The Investigation of the Relationship between L2 Listeners’ Task Dependent Metacognitive Awareness and L2 Listening Comprehension이진영외국어교육연구소 · 외국어교육연구2019 · 제33권 제3호A Mixed-Methods Approach to Exploring EFL Listening Strategy Use: Bangladeshi Tertiary Learners’ Perceived and Task-Based Strategy UseTasnima Aktar아시아테플 · Journal of Asia TEFL2023 · 제20권 제3호Metacognitive Strategy Instruction in L2 Listening Development for EFL College Students조영아대한영어영문학회 · 영어영문학연구2017 · 제43권 제3호Writing Listening Logs and Its Effect on Improving L2 Students’ Metacognitive Awareness and Listening Proficiency이유진, 차경환한국콘텐츠학회 · International Journal of Contents2020 · 제16권 제4호Listener anxiety and listening strategies on multiple-choice items of EFL learners전유아, 최지영한국영어교과교육학회 · 영어교과교육2014 · 제13권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (26건)

Fostering University Students to Deal with Conflict through Critical Literacy in EFL Reading ClassDumrong Adunyarittigunpp. 398-413Korean Secondary EFL Learners’ Reading Comprehension Development through the Student-generated Reading Comprehension Test Development: From the Learning-oriented Assessment ApproachGi Jung Kimpp. 414-430Classroom Activities, Classroom Anxiety and Teacher Roles: Three Dimensions Revealing Class Reality of a University English CourseQiang Huangpp. 431-450Investigating Foreign Language Speaking Anxiety Levels Among Saudi Tertiary Students: Gender and Year Level DifferencesMohammad N. Khreisatpp. 451-468English Language Learning Anxiety in Online and Face-to-Face ClassesBehnam Behforouz, Marilyn C. Gallema, Rhona Maria A. Waga, Saif Al Weshahipp. 469-488
원문 보기