본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

F1/F2의 변화가 한국어 /오/, /우/ 모음의 지각판별에 미치는 영향

Effects of F1/F2 Manipulation on the Perception of Korean Vowels /o/ and /u/

0

조회

0

다운로드

19

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

This study examined the perception of two Korean vowels using F1/F2 manipulated synthetic vowels. Previous studies indicated that there is an overlap between the acoustic spaces of Korean /o/ and /u/ in terms of the first two formants. A continuum of eleven synthetic vowels were used as stimuli. The experiment consisted of three tasks: an /o/ identification task (Yes-no), an /u/ identification task (Yes-no), and a forced choice identification task (/o/-/u/). ROC(Receiver Operating Characteristic) analysis and logistic regression were performed to calculate the boundary criterion of the two vowels along the stimulus continuum, and to predict the perceptual judgment on F1 and F2. The result indicated that the location between stimulus no.5 (F1 = 342Hz, F2 = 691Hz) and no.6 (F1 = 336Hz, F2 = 700Hz) was estimated as a perceptual boundary region between /o/ and /u/, while stimulus no.0 (F1=405Hz, F2=666Hz) and no.10 (F1=321Hz, F2=743Hz) were at opposite ends of the continuum. The influence of F2 was predominant over F1 on the perception of the vowel categories.

Abstract

This study examined the perception of two Korean vowels using F1/F2 manipulated synthetic vowels. Previous studies indicated that there is an overlap between the acoustic spaces of Korean /o/ and /u/ in terms of the first two formants. A continuum of eleven synthetic vowels were used as stimuli. The experiment consisted of three tasks: an /o/ identification task (Yes-no), an /u/ identification task (Yes-no), and a forced choice identification task (/o/-/u/). ROC(Receiver Operating Characteristic) analysis and logistic regression were performed to calculate the boundary criterion of the two vowels along the stimulus continuum, and to predict the perceptual judgment on F1 and F2. The result indicated that the location between stimulus no.5 (F1 = 342Hz, F2 = 691Hz) and no.6 (F1 = 336Hz, F2 = 700Hz) was estimated as a perceptual boundary region between /o/ and /u/, while stimulus no.0 (F1=405Hz, F2=666Hz) and no.10 (F1=321Hz, F2=743Hz) were at opposite ends of the continuum. The influence of F2 was predominant over F1 on the perception of the vowel categories.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. "Praat: doing phonetics by computer" (2012)[URL]
  2. 조성문, "현대 국어의 모음 체계에 대한 음향음성학적인 연구", 한국언어문화, 24, pp.427~442 (2003), 한국언어문화학회
  3. 조소형, "대전지역 20대 성인과 6~7세 아동의 모음특성 비교 : formant 분석을 통하여", 석사, 언어병리학, pp.2010
  4. Fawcett, T., "An introduction to ROC analysis", Pattern Recognition Letters, 27, pp.861~874 (2006)
  5. Greiner, M., "Principles and practical application of the receiver-operating characteristic analysis for diagnostic tests", Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 45, pp.23~41 (2000)
  6. Han, J. I., "Apparent merger of", o, u, pp.in Seoul Korean, Proceedings of the 2013 Spring Conference of the Korean Society of Speech Sciences[DOI]
  7. Hanley, J. A., "The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve", Radiology, 143, pp.29~36 (1982)
  8. 황혜정, "한국인이 발음한 한국어", 에, 애, ɛ, æ, pp.모음, 말소리[DOI]
  9. 장혜진, "대구 방언 단모음의 세대 간 차이에 대한 음향 음성학적 연구", 말소리, 57(57), pp.15~30 (2006), 대한음성학회
  10. 姜順璟, "韓國語와 英語 單純母音의 音響學的 分析", 박사, 영어영문학, pp.1990
  11. 구희산, "지역 방언 화자에 따른 영어 모음의 발음 연구", 음성과학, 8(4), pp.193~206 (2001)
  12. Ladefoged, P., "A course in phonetics" (1993), Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers
  13. 이재강, "한국어와 일본어의 모음에 관한 실험음성학적 대조 분석", 박사, 언어학, pp.1998
  14. Metz, C. E., "Receiver operating characteristic analysis : a tool for the quantitative evaluation of observer performance and imaging systems", Journal of the American College of Radiology, 3, pp.413~422 (2006)
  15. 문승재, "한국어 단모음의 음성학적 기반연구", 말소리, 1(62), pp.1~17 (2007), 대한음성학회
  16. Anna Izabella Paradowska, "폴란드인의 한국어 모음의 발음과 청취에 대한 실험음성학적 연구", 박사, 언어학, pp.2002
  17. 성철재, "PDF한국어 단모음 8개에 대한 음향분석 -F1", F2 모음공간에서의 음향변수를 중심으로, 2004, pp.23(6), 454~461[DOI]
  18. 성철재, "충남지역 대학생들의 한국어 단모음 포먼트 분석", 언어학, 43(43), pp.189~213 (2005), 사단법인 한국언어학회
  19. 판별, "말소리", 2005, 103~126, pp.대한음성학회
  20. Swets, J. A., "Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems", Science, 240(4857), pp.1285~1293 (1988)
  21. Yang, B., "A comparative study of American English and Korean vowels produced by male and female speakers", Journal of Phonetics, 24, pp.245~261 (1996)
  22. Youden, W. J., "An index for rating diagnostic tests", Cancer, 3, pp.32~35 (1950)
  23. 윤지현, "충남방언 화자에 의한", 오, 우, pp.의 청지각적 분류, 석사[DOI]
  24. 윤지현, "한국어 모음", 오, 우, pp.지각실험과 ROC 분석, 2013 한국음성학회 봄 학술대회 발표 논문집[DOI]
  25. Zweig, M. H., "Receiver-operating characteristic(ROC)plots : a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine", Clinical Chemistry, 39, pp.561~577 (1993)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)