본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

공급자개발계획과 자산전용성을 통한 통합적 SCM성과형성모델에 관한 연구

Study on the Integrated SCM Performance Formation Model through Supplier Development Project and Asset Specificity

송장근|오세구
한국유통과학회 (Korea Distribution Science Association)|2014.10|유통과학연구 (Journal of Distribution Science)|제12권 제10호|pp. 85-97|DOI 10.15722/jds.12.10.201410.85

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Information SharingAsset SpecificitySupplier DevelopmentDistribution ScienceSupply Chain Performance Formation Model

초록

Purpose – This study aims to clarify through which process asset specificity and supplier development project (SDP) affect performance. Cooperation, partnership, the level of information exchange, and the importance of information sharing are considered significant variables as mediators related to the process. Finally, the performance formation model of the supply chain through asset specificity and supplier development project would be suggested as being a result of this study. Research design, data, and methodology – Data collection was as follows: questionnaires were distributed to 250 companies that have business ties with H Company. The empirical study to test our hypothesis was based on statistical analysis (using SPSS 19.0 and AMOS 19.0). The hypothesis of this paper is that the asset specificity and supplier development project variables have positive effects on the following variables: mediators such as cooperation and partnership (reliability and dependence); and the cooperation and partnership variables have a positive effect on the following variables: level of information sharing, the importance of information sharing, and level of information sharing; the importance of information sharing has a positive effect on supply chain performance. We tested our hypothesized model utilizing path analysis with latent variables. Results – First, it was found that asset specificity has significant positive effects on cooperation (H1), reliability (H2), and dependability (H3). Second, it was proved that the level of comprehension on the purpose of SDP has positive effects significantly on cooperation (H4), reliability (H5), and dependability (H6). Third, the hypotheses related to cooperation were all significantly accepted. The relationships of cooperation with the level (H7) and importance (H8) of information sharing were significant. Fourth, the hypotheses related to reliability were all significantly accepted. The relationships of reliability with the level (H9) and importance (H10) of information sharing were significant. In terms of dependability, however, the hypotheses were partially accepted. The effect of dependability was significant on the importance of information sharing (H12), but insignificant on the level of information sharing (H11). Finally, the causal relationships from the level of information sharing to SCM performance (H13) and from the importance of information sharing to SCM performance (H14) were both significantly accepted. Conclusion – First, with rapid changes in the business environment, enterprises should acquire the right information to properly implement SCM. For successful SCM, firms should understand the supplier development project. Second, asset specificity and the level of comprehension on SDP have significant effects both on cooperation and partnership (reliability and dependability). Third, mediators such as cooperation, reliability, and dependability significantly affect the level and importance of information sharing. Fourth, the level and importance of information sharing have significant impacts on SCM performance. This paper makes a meaningful contribution to further the understanding of how SDP affects SCM performance. Finally, successful SCM performance is achieved by information sharing through a collaborative environment and partnership (confidence & dependence) rather than by investing only in setting up an information system.

Abstract

Purpose – This study aims to clarify through which process asset specificity and supplier development project (SDP) affect performance. Cooperation, partnership, the level of information exchange, and the importance of information sharing are considered significant variables as mediators related to the process. Finally, the performance formation model of the supply chain through asset specificity and supplier development project would be suggested as being a result of this study. Research design, data, and methodology – Data collection was as follows: questionnaires were distributed to 250 companies that have business ties with H Company. The empirical study to test our hypothesis was based on statistical analysis (using SPSS 19.0 and AMOS 19.0). The hypothesis of this paper is that the asset specificity and supplier development project variables have positive effects on the following variables: mediators such as cooperation and partnership (reliability and dependence); and the cooperation and partnership variables have a positive effect on the following variables: level of information sharing, the importance of information sharing, and level of information sharing; the importance of information sharing has a positive effect on supply chain performance. We tested our hypothesized model utilizing path analysis with latent variables. Results – First, it was found that asset specificity has significant positive effects on cooperation (H1), reliability (H2), and dependability (H3). Second, it was proved that the level of comprehension on the purpose of SDP has positive effects significantly on cooperation (H4), reliability (H5), and dependability (H6). Third, the hypotheses related to cooperation were all significantly accepted. The relationships of cooperation with the level (H7) and importance (H8) of information sharing were significant. Fourth, the hypotheses related to reliability were all significantly accepted. The relationships of reliability with the level (H9) and importance (H10) of information sharing were significant. In terms of dependability, however, the hypotheses were partially accepted. The effect of dependability was significant on the importance of information sharing (H12), but insignificant on the level of information sharing (H11). Finally, the causal relationships from the level of information sharing to SCM performance (H13) and from the importance of information sharing to SCM performance (H14) were both significantly accepted. Conclusion – First, with rapid changes in the business environment, enterprises should acquire the right information to properly implement SCM. For successful SCM, firms should understand the supplier development project. Second, asset specificity and the level of comprehension on SDP have significant effects both on cooperation and partnership (reliability and dependability). Third, mediators such as cooperation, reliability, and dependability significantly affect the level and importance of information sharing. Fourth, the level and importance of information sharing have significant impacts on SCM performance. This paper makes a meaningful contribution to further the understanding of how SDP affects SCM performance. Finally, successful SCM performance is achieved by information sharing through a collaborative environment and partnership (confidence & dependence) rather than by investing only in setting up an information system.

참고문헌 (72)

  1. Anderson, J. C., "A Model of Distributor Firm and Manufacturing Firm Working Partnerships", Journal of Marketing, 54, pp.42~58 (1990)
  2. Aoki, M., "Information, Incentives, and Bargaining in the Japanese Economy" (1988), Cambridge University Press
  3. Bennett, D., "Achieving business excellence through synchronous supply in the automotive sector", Benchmarking, 13, pp.12~22 (2006)
  4. Bensaou, M., "Portfolios of Buyer-Supplier Relationships", Sloan Management Review, 40(3), pp.35~44 (1999)
  5. 최수정, "기업간 관계자산 특유성이 전자적 협력과 성과에 미치는 영향", Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 16(4), pp.121~149 (2006), 한국경영정보학회
  6. Chopra, S., "Supply Chain Management ;Strategy, Planning, and Operation" (2001), Prentice Hall
  7. Chu, S. Y., "Exploring the relationships of trust and commitment in supply chain management", Journal of American Academy of Business, 9, pp.224~228 (2006)
  8. Chwen, Sheu., "Determinants of supplier-retailer collaboration : evidence from an international study", International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 26(1), pp.24~49 (2006)
  9. Cooper, M., "Supply Chain Management : More Than a New Name for Logistics", The International Journal of Logistics Management, 9(1), pp.1~13 (1997)
  10. Corsten, Daniel, "Exploring the performance effects of key-supplier collaboration", International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 35(6), pp.445~461 (2005)
  11. Derocher, R., "Six Supply Chain Lessons for the Millennium", Supply Chain Management Review, 13(4), pp.34~41 (2000)
  12. Dunn, S. C., "Supplier Assistance Within Supplier Development Initiatives", Journal of Supply Chain Management, 40(3), pp.19~29 (2004)
  13. Dyer, J. H., "Specialized Supplier Networks as a Source of Competitive Advantage : Evidence from the Auto Industry", Strategic Management Journal, 17(4), pp.271~291 (1996)
  14. Dyer, J. H., "Effective Inter-firm Collaboration : How Firms Minimize Transaction cost and Maximize Transaction Value", Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), pp.535~556 (1997)
  15. Dyer, J. H., "The Relational View : Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Inter-organizational Competitive Advantage", Academy of Management Review, 23(4), pp.660~679 (1998)
  16. Ganesan, S., "Determinants of Long-Term Orientation in Buyer-Seller Relationships", Journal of Marketing, 58, pp.1~19 (1994)
  17. Hahn, C. K., "The Supplier Development Program : A Conceptual Model", International Journal of Purchasing and Material Management, 26(2), pp.2~7 (1990)
  18. Handfield, R. B., "The Role of Trust and Relationship Structure in Improving supply chain responsiveness", Industrial Marketing Management, 31, pp.23~42 (2002)
  19. Heide, J. B., "Alliances in Industrial Purchasing : The Determinants of Joint Action in Buyer-Supplier Relationships", Journal of Marketing Research, 27(2), pp.24~36 (1990)
  20. Heilklila, J., "From Supply to Demand Chain Management : Efficiency and Customer Satisfaction", Journal of Operations Management, 20(6), pp.747~767 (2002)
  21. 홍관수, "공급자 개발을 위한 지식이전활동에서의 영향요인, 지식변화속도 그리고 성과", 경영과학, 26(2), pp.113~134 (2009), 한국경영과학회
  22. Humphreys, P. K., "Collaborative Buyer-Supplier Relationships in Hong Kong Manufacturing Firms", Supply Chain Management : An International Journal, 6(4), pp.152~162 (2001)
  23. 허대식, "구매기업의 지식기반 공급자개발활동이 공급기업의 사회적 자본, 지식습득 및 운영성과에 미치는 영향", 한국생산관리학회지, 24(2), pp.185~215 (2013), 한국생산관리학회
  24. Jap, S. D., "Pie-Expansion Efforts: Collaboration Processes in Buyer-Supplier Relationships", Journal of Marketing Research, 36(4), pp.61~75 (1999)
  25. Johnston, D. A., "Effects of Supplier Trust on Performance of Cooperative Supplier Relationships", Journal of operations Management, 22(1), pp.23~38 (2004)
  26. 김철수, "공급사슬 성과에 대한 협업의 매개효과에 관한 연구: 이동통신산업의 구매사-공급사를 중심으로", Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 16(3), pp.1~27 (2006), 한국경영정보학회
  27. 김광석, "정보공유와 SCM성과와의 관계에 관한 실증연구: 정보공유의 선행요인 분석을 중심으로", 산업혁신연구, 28(2), pp.101~130 (2012), 산업개발연구소[DOI]
  28. 김진한, "공급자 개발 프로그램의 성과와 의사소통의 역할: 공급자 관점", 한국생산관리학회지, 23(2), pp.127~153 (2012), 한국생산관리학회[DOI]
  29. 김진완, "전자적 파트너십에서 공급자의 전략적 혜택 창출을 위한 협업의 효과에 관한 연구", 정보시스템연구, 17(4), pp.341~367 (2008), 한국정보시스템학회
  30. 김태룡, "자산전용성과 협업환경하에서의 정보공유가 공급사슬에 미치는 영향 : 통합적 SCM 성과형성 모델", 유통과학연구, 11(4), pp.51~60 (2013), 한국유통과학회
  31. 김태환, "자동차 부품산업의 공간적 재구조화와 입지 패턴 변화", 대한지리학회지, 42(3), pp.434~452 (2007), 대한지리학회
  32. Koh, S. C., "Competing in the 21st century supply chain through supply chain management and enterprise resource planning integration", International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 36, pp.455~465 (2006)
  33. Krause, D. R., "Supplier Development : Current Practices and Outcomes", International Journal of Purchasing and Material Management, 33(2), pp.12~19 (1997)
  34. Krause, D. R., "Supplier Development Practices : Product-and-Service-Based industry comparison", Journal of Supply Chain Management, 38(2), pp.13~21 (2002)
  35. Kumar, K., "Sustainable Collaboration : Managing Conflict and Cooperation in Interorganization System", MIS Quarterly, 20(2), pp.279~300 (1996)
  36. Kwon, I. K., "Factors affecting the level of trust and commitment in supply chain relations", Journal of Supply Chain Management, 40(2), pp.4~14 (2004)
  37. Lee, H. L., "The Bullwhip Effect in Supply Chain", Sloan Management Review, 38(3), pp.93~102 (1997)
  38. Lee, Hak-Sik, "Structural equation modeling with AMOS16.0", pp.198~191 (2011), Bobmunsa
  39. 이석인, "조직간 전자거래의 수준이 조직간 관계의 성과에 미치는 영향", Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 12(3), pp.115~133 (2002), 한국경영정보학회
  40. Liker, J. K., "Building deep supplier relationships", Harvard Business Review, 82, pp.1~11 (2004)
  41. Lin, F. R., "Effects of Information Sharing on Supply Chain Performance in Electronic Commerce", IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49(3), pp.258~268 (2002)
  42. Mentzer, J. T., "Collaboration : The Enablers, Impediments, and Benefits", Supply Chain Management Review, 4(4), pp.52~58 (2000)
  43. Metters, R., "Quantifying the Bullwhip Effects in Supply Chains", Journal of Operations Management, 15(1), pp.89~100 (1997)
  44. Moberg, C., "Identifying antecedents of information exchange within supply chains", International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 32(9), pp.755~770 (2002)
  45. Monczka, R. M., "Success Factors in Strategic Supplier Alliances : The Buying Company Perspective", Decision Science, 29(3), pp.553~573 (1998)
  46. Moorman, C., "Relationships Between Providers and Users of Marketing Research: The Dynamics of Trust Within and Between Organizations", Journal of Marketing Research, 29, pp.314~429 (1992)
  47. Morgan, R. M., "The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing", Journal of Marketing, 58, pp.20~38 (1994)
  48. Nelson, D., "The 10 procurement pitfalls", Supply Chain Management Review, 9(3), pp.38~45 (2005)
  49. 오세구, "기업 간 협업환경 및 신뢰의 구축이 기업성과에 미치는 영향 - 통합된 공급사슬의 관점에서", 한국생산관리학회지, 21(4), pp.413~426 (2010), 한국생산관리학회
  50. Petersen, K. J., "An Examination of Collaborative Planning Effectiveness and Supply Chain Performance", Journal of Supply Chain Management, 42(2), pp.14~25 (2005)
  51. Ring, P. S., "Structuring Cooperative Relationships Between Organizations", Strategic Management Journal, 13, pp.83~98 (1992)
  52. Ruyter, K., "Antecedent of Commitment and Trust in Customer-Supplier Relationships in High Technology Markets", Industrial Marketing Management, 30, pp.271~286 (2001)
  53. Sahin, F., "Flow Coordination and Information Sharing in Supply Chains : Review, Implication, and Directions for Future Research", Decision Science, 33(4), pp.505~536 (2002)
  54. Sako, M., "Supplier development at Honda, Nissan and Toyota : Comparison Case Studies of Organizational Capability Enhancement", Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(2), pp.281~308 (2004)
  55. Sanchez-Rodriguez, C., "The Effect of Supplier Development Initiatives on Purchasing performance : A Structural Model", Supply Chain Management, 10(4), pp.289~301 (2005)
  56. Selnes, F., "Promoting Relationship Learning", Journal of Marketing, 67, pp.80~95 (2003)
  57. Seo, Youn-Joo, "A Study of Supplier Relations Asset Specificity and Suppliers’ Performance In the Korean Auto Industry", Korean Management Science Review, 16(1), pp.115~135 (1999)
  58. Simatupang, T. M., "The Collaborative Supply Chain", International Journal of Logistics Management, 13(1), pp.15~30 (2002)
  59. Simchi-Levi, D., "Designing and Managing the Supply Chain", pp.2003, McGraw-Hill
  60. 송장근, "물류 및 공급사슬 경쟁전략으로서의 정보공유 : 공급자 개발계획의 성과형성모델", 한국SCM학회지, 9(2), pp.89~98 (2009), 한국SCM학회
  61. 송장근, "정보공유를 통한 성과형성모델: 자산전용성과 정보공유가 공급사슬 내 성과에 미치는 영향", 한국생산관리학회지, 21(1), pp.101~121 (2010), 한국생산관리학회
  62. Stank, T. P., "Supply Chain Collaboration and Logistical Service Performance", Journal of Business Logistics, 22(1), pp.29~48 (2001)
  63. Shuai Su, "A study of Chinese distribution policies and challenges", The International Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 4(1), pp.11~14 (2013), 한국유통과학회
  64. Subramani, M., "Safeguarding Investments in Asymmetric Inter-organizational Relationships : Theory and Evidence", Academy of Management Journal, 46(1), pp.46~62 (2003)
  65. Sun, P. C., "The Correlations among Domain Knowledge Specificity, Joint New Product Development and Relationship Performance", International Journal of Commerce and Management, 17(2), pp.44~55 (2007)
  66. Taj, S., "Application of Constrained Management and Lean Manufacturing in Developing Best Practices for Productivity Improvement in An auto-Assembly Plant", International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55(3), pp.332~345 (2006)
  67. Towill, D. R., "Industrial Dynamics Simulation Models in the Design of Supply Chains", International Journal of physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 22(5), pp.3~13 (1992)
  68. Williamsom, O. E., "Economic Organization: Firm, Market and Policy Control" (1986), New York University Press
  69. 윤명길, "한국에서의 유통학문 연구 방법론에 대한 소고", 유통과학연구, 5(1), pp.75~88 (2007), 한국유통과학회
  70. Zaheer, AKbar, "Relational Governance as an Inter-organizational Strategy : An Empirical Test of the Role of Thrust in Economic Exchange", Strategic Management Journal, 16(54), pp.373~392 (1995)
  71. Zajac, E. J., "From Trans-action Cost to Transactional Value Analysis; Implications for the Study of Inter-organizational Strategies", Journal of Management Studies, 30(1), pp.131~145 (1993)
  72. Zsidisin, G. A., "The Relationship Between Purchasing and Supply Management’s Perceived Value and Participation in Strategic Supplier Cost Management Activities", Journal of Business Logistics, 24(2), pp.129~154 (2003)

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)

A Critical Analysis on Capital Market Developments in India: Pre and Post Liberalization PeriodShaik Abdul Majeeb Pasha, Rajasekhara Mouly Potluri, Siva Kumar Challa, Srilakshmi Challagundlapp. 5-9The Relationship between the Technology-Based Self-Service Convenience Orientation Factor and Convenience in Retail Stores윤명길, 심규열, 이수형, 양희진pp. 11-17Effects of the m-VALS on the Mobile Shopping Acceptance Incentive and Consistent Use Intention김안식, 양회창pp. 19-28The Effects of Creating Shared Value on Corporate Performance물 프레산트, 이창곤, 나준희, 박종철pp. 29-35Impacts of Innovative EU Companies on Smaller Emerging Markets under an Open Economy서대성pp. 37-45
원문 보기