Public Participation in the Process of Local Public Health Policy, Using Policy Network Analysis
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: To assess the current public participation in-local health policy and its implications through the analysis of policy networksin health center programs. Methods: We examined the decision-making process in sub-health center installations and the implementation process in metabolic syndrome management program cases in two districts (‘gu’s) of Seoul. Participants of the policy network were selected by the snowballingmethod and completed self-administered questionnaires. Actors, the interactions among actors, and the characteristics of the network were analyzed by Netminer. Results: The results showed that the public is not yet actively participating in the local public health policy processes of decision-making and implementation. In the decision-making process, most of the network actors were in the public sector, while the private sector was a minor actor and participated in only a limited number of issues after the major decisions were made. In the implementationprocess, the program was led by the health center, while other actors participated passively. Conclusions: Public participation in Korean public health policy is not yet well activated. Preliminary discussions with various stakeholders,including civil society, are needed before making important local public health policy decisions. In addition, efforts to include local institutions and residents in the implementation process with the public officials are necessary to improve the situation.
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the current public participation in-local health policy and its implications through the analysis of policy networksin health center programs. Methods: We examined the decision-making process in sub-health center installations and the implementation process in metabolic syndrome management program cases in two districts (‘gu’s) of Seoul. Participants of the policy network were selected by the snowballingmethod and completed self-administered questionnaires. Actors, the interactions among actors, and the characteristics of the network were analyzed by Netminer. Results: The results showed that the public is not yet actively participating in the local public health policy processes of decision-making and implementation. In the decision-making process, most of the network actors were in the public sector, while the private sector was a minor actor and participated in only a limited number of issues after the major decisions were made. In the implementationprocess, the program was led by the health center, while other actors participated passively. Conclusions: Public participation in Korean public health policy is not yet well activated. Preliminary discussions with various stakeholders,including civil society, are needed before making important local public health policy decisions. In addition, efforts to include local institutions and residents in the implementation process with the public officials are necessary to improve the situation.
참고문헌 (22)
- Jung JG, "The theories of policy sciences", pp.319~350 (2003), Dae Myoung Press
- Yoo JW, "Expanding civil participation: participatory democratic view", Korean Policy Sci Rev, 7(2), pp.105~215 (2003)
- Bachrach P, "Power and empowerment: a radical theory of participatory democracy", pp.2~18 (1992), Temple University Press
- 강인성, "지방정부 주민참여제도의 정책과정과 참여유형에 따른 영향력 분석: 16개 광역자치단체를 중심으로", 한국행정학보, 42(3), pp.215~238 (2008), 한국행정학회
- Rawls J, "A theory of justice", pp.228~234 (1999), Belknap Press of Harvard University Press
- Lee HW., "Public health policy and citizen participation", J Health Welf, 5(1), pp.1~15 (2000)
- Kim SO, "The impacts of community participation on regional health planning process", Korean J Health Policy Adm, 8(1), pp.112~134 (1998)
- Kim BK, "Status of and influencing factors on public participation in the process of establishing the community health plan: a case study of one city of Gyeonggi provice", pp.2011
- 김둘순, "지역보건정책결정 과정에서 주민참여 실태분석: 수돗물불소농도조정사업 사례를 중심으로", 지방정부연구, 12(3), pp.173~194 (2008), 한국지방정부학회
- 박연주, "보건소 건강증진 프로그램 신청자의 참여 상태와 관련요인", 농촌의학.지역보건, 35(3), pp.287~300 (2010), 한국농촌의학.지역보건학회
- 이태화, "건강증진사업 시범여부에 따른 지역주민의 사업인식과 참여도, 건강행위 비교 연구", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 35(4), pp.461~468 (2005), 한국간호과학회
- "Community health care and democratic publicness. A cooperation model for community health promotion: statement of open forum" (2012)[URL]
- Paik JH, "A structural analysis of safe community program using a social network analysis: focusing on safety doctor program of public health center in Songpa-district, Seoul", J Gov Policy, 6(2), pp.5~49 (2014)
- Development the measures for community capacity in Korea, "Cho BH", Korea Health Promotion Foundation, Seoul National University, 193~196 (2010)
- Kim YH, "Social network analysis", pp.27~29 (2011), Pakyoungsa
- Cyram, "An education book on social network analysis using NetMiner", pp.95~105 (2012), Cyram Co
- Sa JM, "An activation plan for the citizen participation on policy process", Korean Public Adm Policy Rev, 4(1), pp.69~99 (2006)
- 최병대, "정책과정에서 위원회의 역할에 관한 실증분석：녹색서울시민위원회의 난지도 골프장 건설사례를 중심으로", 서울도시연구, 6(4), pp.153~168 (2005), 서울연구원
- 김익식, "지역사회 정치문화 및 주민참여에 관한 경험적 연구 - 수원시 사례를 중심으로 -", 한국지방자치학회보, 16(4), pp.31~49 (2004), 한국지방자치학회
- Niemeyer S, "The emancipatory effect of deliberation: empirical lessons from mini-publics", Politics Soc, 39(1), pp.103~140 (2011)
- Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seoul Metropolitan Government Metabolic Syndrome Care Program Institute, "A guidebook on metabolic syndrome management of Seoul Metropolitan Government in 2011", Seoul: Seoul Metropolitan Governmen, 13~18 (2011)
- 이현주, "김해지역 노인 보건·복지서비스 제공기관의 연계망에 관한 연구", 한국지역사회복지학, (37), pp.165~197 (2011), 한국지역사회복지학회