Effects of conventional and self-etching adhesive systems on bond strength of orthodontic attachments bonded to erupted and unerupted teeth
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the shear bond strength (SBS) and failure-mode of orthodontic buttons bonded to erupted and unerupted teeth with conventional and self-etching adhesive systems. Methods: Eighty-four erupted and 84 unerupted, human third-molar teeth were used. For both groups, the buccal surfaces of each tooth were assigned one of the following type of adhesive systems (n = 12). A, Conventional systems: 1, Transbond XT (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA); 2, Prime & Bond NT (Dentsply/Caulk, Milford, USA); 3, Single Bond (3M ESPE, Minnesota, USA); and B, Self-etching adhesives; 4, Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray, Okayama, Japan); 5, Transbond Plus (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA); 6, Clearfil S3 (Kuraray, Tokyo, Japan); 7, G Bond (GC, Tokyo, Japan). The SBSs of the attachments and the adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores were recorded. Data were analyzed with analysis of variance (ANOVA), independent-sample t-test and chi-square tests. Results: When the SBSs of erupted and unerupted teeth were compared, only the Clearfil-SE Bond and G-Bond were significantly different. Bond strengths of all adhesive systems were higher in unerupted teeth than erupted teeth, except the Single-Bond system. Conclusions: When using conventional adhesives, bonding to erupted and unerupted teeth may not be significantly different. However, clinicians need to take into consideration the types of self-etching systems before usage. (Korean J Orthod 2010;40(4):267-275)
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the shear bond strength (SBS) and failure-mode of orthodontic buttons bonded to erupted and unerupted teeth with conventional and self-etching adhesive systems. Methods: Eighty-four erupted and 84 unerupted, human third-molar teeth were used. For both groups, the buccal surfaces of each tooth were assigned one of the following type of adhesive systems (n = 12). A, Conventional systems: 1, Transbond XT (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA); 2, Prime & Bond NT (Dentsply/Caulk, Milford, USA); 3, Single Bond (3M ESPE, Minnesota, USA); and B, Self-etching adhesives; 4, Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray, Okayama, Japan); 5, Transbond Plus (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA); 6, Clearfil S3 (Kuraray, Tokyo, Japan); 7, G Bond (GC, Tokyo, Japan). The SBSs of the attachments and the adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores were recorded. Data were analyzed with analysis of variance (ANOVA), independent-sample t-test and chi-square tests. Results: When the SBSs of erupted and unerupted teeth were compared, only the Clearfil-SE Bond and G-Bond were significantly different. Bond strengths of all adhesive systems were higher in unerupted teeth than erupted teeth, except the Single-Bond system. Conclusions: When using conventional adhesives, bonding to erupted and unerupted teeth may not be significantly different. However, clinicians need to take into consideration the types of self-etching systems before usage. (Korean J Orthod 2010;40(4):267-275)
참고문헌 (26)
- Bishara SE, "Evaluation of a new nano-filled restorative material for bonding orthodontic brackets", World J Orthod, 8, pp.8~12 (2007)
- Almy D, "Bonding properties of newly erupted and mature human premolars", 석사, pp.2004
- Crabb HS, "The porous outer enamel of unerupted human premolars", Caries Res, 10, pp.1~7 (1976)
- Bonar LC, "Structural and composition studies on the mineral of newly formed dental enamel: a chemical, x-ray diffraction, and 31P and proton nuclear magnetic resonance study", J Bone Miner Res, 11, pp.1167~76 (1991)
- Ooya K, "A scanning electron microscopic study on the differences between newly erupted teeth and old teeth with reference to fissure enamel surfaces and contents", Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ, 24, pp.89~102 (1977)
- Brudevold F, "A preliminary study of posteruptive maturation of teeth in situ", Caries Res, 16, pp.243~8 (1982)
- Sfondrini MF, "Effects of conventional and high-intensity light-curing on enamel shear bond strength of composite resin and resin-modified glass- ionomer", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 119, pp.30~5 (2001)
- Romano FL, "Shear bond strength of metallic orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel prepared with Self-Etching Primer", Angle Orthod, 75, pp.849~53 (2005)
- White LW, "An expedited indirect bonding technique", J Clin Orthod, 35, pp.36~41 (2001)
- Kotsanos N, "Influence of posteruptive age of enamel on its susceptibility to artificial caries", Caries Res, 25, pp.241~50 (1991)
- Tüfekçi E, "Bonding properties of newly erupted and mature premolars", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 131, pp.753~8 (2007)
- Jacobs G, "Bonding characteristics of impacted versus erupted permanent teeth", Am J Orthod, 89, pp.242~5 (1986)
- Oliver RG, "Bond strength of orthodontic attachments to enamel from unerupted and erupted young permanent teeth", Eur J Orthod, 8, pp.123~6 (1986)
- Artun J, "Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment", Am J Orthod, 85, pp.333~40 (1984)
- Sheen DH, "Bond strength of younger and older permanent teeth with various etching times", Angle Orthod, 63, pp.225~30 (1993)
- Bhaskar SN, "Orban’s oral histology and embryology. 9th ed", pp.46~106 (1980), The C.V. Mosby
- Nordenvall KJ, "Etching of deciduous teeth and young and old permanent teeth: a comparison between 15 and 60 seconds of etching", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 78, pp.99~108 (1980)
- Sharma-Sayal SK, "The influence of orthodontic bracket base design on shear bond strength", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 124, pp.74~82 (2003)
- MacColl GA, "The relationship between bond strength and orthodontic bracket base surface area with conventional and microetched foil-mesh bases", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 113, pp.276~81 (1998)
- Buyukyilmaz T, "Effect of self-etching primers on bond strength - are they reliable?", Angle Orthod, 73, pp.64~70 (2003)
- Dorminey JC, "Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with a modified 1-step etchant and primer technique", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 124, pp.410~3 (2003)
- Bishara SE, "Effect of a self-etch primer", adhesive on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets, 2001, pp.119, 621~4
- Larmour CJ, "An ex vivo assessment of a bonding technique using a self-etching primer", J Orthod, 30, pp.225~8 (2003)
- Davari AR, "Effect of different types of enamel conditioners on", J Contemp Dent Pract, 8, pp.36~43 (2007)
- Tay FR, "An ultra-structural study of the influence of acidity of self-etching primers and smear layer thickness on bonding to intact dentin", J Adhes Dent, 2, pp.83~98 (2000)
- Miller MB, "Self-etching adhesives: solving the sensitivity conundrum", Pract Proced Aesthet Dent, 14, pp.406~ (2002)