여성의 출산력과 초경 및 폐경 연령에 대한 설문지의 신뢰도
Reliability of a Questionnaire for Women’s Reproductive History
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives : This study was performed to evaluate the reproducibility of a questionnaire concerned with reproductive history and to ascertain which characteristics of the subjects (age, the visit-revisit intervals, education and chronic disease) are associated with good reliability in the Korean Multi-Center Cancer Cohort (KMCC) study. Materials and Methods: A total of 19,688 participants were enrolled between 1993 and 2004. Among them, we selected 386 participants who were aged 40 or more and who re-visited within 8 years after the first visit. Reliability was measured by the percent agreement according to error range for the continuous variables and the percent agreement and kappa statistics for the categorical variables. Results : The pregnancy histories were reliable (kappa=0.67) and the reasons for being menopausal among the postmenopausal women were also reliable (kappa=0.92). The percent agreement of the breast-feeding history was high (96.1%), although the kappa statistic was low. For the continuous variables, when the error range of one variable was considered to be reliable, the percent agreement of the age at menarche and the age at the first full term pregnancy was good (69.4% and 83.6%), whereas that of the age at menopause was low (51.5%). The factors associated with high reliability were a younger age, the presence of chronic disease and a short visit-revisit time interval. Conclusions : The agreements for parity, the reasons for menopause, and the breastfeeding history in the reproductive history questionnaire used in the KMCC were relatively good. The questionnaire for the menarche age and the menopausal age might have lower reliability due to the difference between Korean age and American age. To obtain reliable information, more attention should be given to the items in questionnaire-based surveys, and especially for surveying old-aged women.
Abstract
Objectives : This study was performed to evaluate the reproducibility of a questionnaire concerned with reproductive history and to ascertain which characteristics of the subjects (age, the visit-revisit intervals, education and chronic disease) are associated with good reliability in the Korean Multi-Center Cancer Cohort (KMCC) study. Materials and Methods: A total of 19,688 participants were enrolled between 1993 and 2004. Among them, we selected 386 participants who were aged 40 or more and who re-visited within 8 years after the first visit. Reliability was measured by the percent agreement according to error range for the continuous variables and the percent agreement and kappa statistics for the categorical variables. Results : The pregnancy histories were reliable (kappa=0.67) and the reasons for being menopausal among the postmenopausal women were also reliable (kappa=0.92). The percent agreement of the breast-feeding history was high (96.1%), although the kappa statistic was low. For the continuous variables, when the error range of one variable was considered to be reliable, the percent agreement of the age at menarche and the age at the first full term pregnancy was good (69.4% and 83.6%), whereas that of the age at menopause was low (51.5%). The factors associated with high reliability were a younger age, the presence of chronic disease and a short visit-revisit time interval. Conclusions : The agreements for parity, the reasons for menopause, and the breastfeeding history in the reproductive history questionnaire used in the KMCC were relatively good. The questionnaire for the menarche age and the menopausal age might have lower reliability due to the difference between Korean age and American age. To obtain reliable information, more attention should be given to the items in questionnaire-based surveys, and especially for surveying old-aged women.
참고문헌 (25)
- Rockhill, B., "Age at menarche, time to regular cycling, and breast cancer (North Carolina, United States)", Cancer Causes Control, 9(4), pp.447~453 (1998)
- Xu, W.H, "Menstrual and reproductive factors and endometrial cancer risk: Results from a population-based casecontrol study in urban Shanghai", Int J Cancer, 108(4), pp.613~619 (2004)
- Walker, C.L., "Role of hormonal and reproductive factors in the etiology and treatment of uterine leiomyoma", Recent Prog Horm Res, 57, pp.277~294 (2002)
- Newcomb, P.A., "Lactation in relation to postmenopausal breast cancer", Am J Epidemiol, 150(2), pp.174~182 (1999)
- Chiaffarino, F., "Breastfeeding and the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in an Italian population", Gynecol Oncol, 98(2), pp.304~308 (2005)
- Rea, M.F., "Benefits of breastfeeding and womenP s health", Pediatr (Rio J), 80(5), pp.142~146 (2004)
- Belchetz, P., "Hormonal treatment of postmenopausal women", N Engl J Med, 330(15), pp.1062~1071 (1994)
- Schlesselman, J.J., "Case-Control Studies: Design, Conduct, Analysis" (1982), Oxford University Press
- Stein, A.D., "Reproducibility of responses to telephone interviews: Demographic predictors of discordance in risk factor status", Am J Epidemiol, 141(11), pp.1097~1105 (1995)
- Hong, J.S., "Cohort study on age at menopause and mortality", Korean J Prev Med, 34(4), pp.323~330 (2001)
- Nam, T.S., "A survey on menarche on school girls in Seoul and Daegu area", Korean J Prev Med, 9(2), pp.153~158 (1976)
- Altman, D.G., "Practical Statistics for Medical Research" (1991), Chapman and Hall
- Casey, V.A., "Accuracy of recall by middle-aged participants in a longitudinal study of their body size and indices of maturation earlier in life", Ann Hum Biol, 18(2), pp.155~166 (1991)
- Bergsten-Bruceford, A., "note on the accuracy of recalled age at menarche", Ann Hum Biol, 3(1), pp.71~73 (1976)
- Must, A., "Recall of early menstrual history and menarcheal body size: after 30 years, how well do women remember?", Am J Epidemiol, 155(7), pp.672~679 (2002)
- Koo, M.M., "Accuracy of short-term recall of age at menarche", Ann Hum Biol, 24(1), pp.61~64 (1997)
- Cooper, R., "Validity of age at menarche self-reported in adulthood", J Epidemiol Community Health, 60(11), pp.993~997 (2006)
- Rödström, K., "Reproducibility of self-reported menopause age at the 24-year follow-up of a population study of women in Göteborg, Sweden", Menopause, 12(3), pp.275~280 (2005)
- Den Tonkelaar, I., "Validity and reproducibility of self-reported age at menopause in women participating in the DOM-project", Maturitas, 27(2), pp.117~123 (1997)
- Hahn, R.A., "Reliability of reported age at menopause", Am J Epidemiol, 146(9), pp.771~775 (1997)
- Bosetti, C., "Reliability of data on medical conditions, menstrual and reproductive history provided by hospital controls", J Clin Epidemiol, 54(9), pp.902~906 (2001)
- Cicchetti, D.V., "High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes", J Clin Epidemiol, 43(6), pp.551~558 (1990)
- Feinstein, A.R., "High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes", J Clin Epidemiol, 43(6), pp.543~549 (1990)
- Scarlett, S.L., "Reliability of self-reported reproductive factors and childhood social class indicators in a casecontrol study in women", Ann Epidemiol, 12(4), pp.242~247 (2002)
- Mills, K.M., "Reliability of proxy-reported and self-reported household appliance use", Epidemiology, 11(5), pp.581~588 (2000)
