Comparison of masticatory efficiency according to Angle’s classification of malocclusion
2
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the differences in masticatory efficiency among patients with different Angle’s classes of malocclusion and to assess the correlation between masticatory efficiency and the occlusal contact area. Methods: The mixing ability index (MAI) was calculated for measuring masticatory efficiency of 61 adult patients according to Angle’s classifications of malocclusion. The study included 25, 15, and 21 patients with Angle’s Class I, II, and III malocclusions, respectively. Silicone interocclusal recording material was used to measure the occlusal contact area. Results: Both the MAI and occlusal contact area showed the highest average values in the Class I malocclusion group, followed by the Class II and Class III malocclusion groups. No significant difference was observed in the MAI values between the Class I and Class II malocclusion groups (p > 0.05), whereas a significant difference was observed between the Class I and Class III malocclusion groups (p < 0.01) and between the Class II and Class III malocclusion groups (p < 0.05). A weak positive correlation was also observed between the MAI and occlusal contact area (p < 0.01, r2 = 0.13). Conclusions: The results of this study indicated that masticatory efficiency was the highest in patients with Angle’s Class I malocclusion, followed by those with Angle’s Class II and Angle’s Class III malocclusions. Moreover, a weak positive correlation was observed between masticatory efficiency and the occlusal contact area.[Korean J Orthod 2017;47(3):151-157]
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the differences in masticatory efficiency among patients with different Angle’s classes of malocclusion and to assess the correlation between masticatory efficiency and the occlusal contact area. Methods: The mixing ability index (MAI) was calculated for measuring masticatory efficiency of 61 adult patients according to Angle’s classifications of malocclusion. The study included 25, 15, and 21 patients with Angle’s Class I, II, and III malocclusions, respectively. Silicone interocclusal recording material was used to measure the occlusal contact area. Results: Both the MAI and occlusal contact area showed the highest average values in the Class I malocclusion group, followed by the Class II and Class III malocclusion groups. No significant difference was observed in the MAI values between the Class I and Class II malocclusion groups (p > 0.05), whereas a significant difference was observed between the Class I and Class III malocclusion groups (p < 0.01) and between the Class II and Class III malocclusion groups (p < 0.05). A weak positive correlation was also observed between the MAI and occlusal contact area (p < 0.01, r2 = 0.13). Conclusions: The results of this study indicated that masticatory efficiency was the highest in patients with Angle’s Class I malocclusion, followed by those with Angle’s Class II and Angle’s Class III malocclusions. Moreover, a weak positive correlation was observed between masticatory efficiency and the occlusal contact area.[Korean J Orthod 2017;47(3):151-157]
참고문헌 (29)
- Buschang PH, "Masticatory ability and performance:the effects of mutilated and maloccluded dentitions", Semin Orthod, 12, pp.92~101 (2006)
- Miura H, "Chewing ability and quality of life among the elderly residing in a rural community in Japan", J Oral Rehabil, 27, pp.731~734 (2000)
- Christiansen EG, "The chewing power of teeth", Br Dent J, 45, pp.318~319 (1924)
- Mahmood WA, "Use of image analysis in determining masticatory efficiency in patients presenting for immediate dentures", Int J Prosthodont, 5, pp.359~366 (1992)
- Sato H, "A new and simple method for evaluating masticatory function using newly developed artificial test food", J Oral Rehabil, 30, pp.68~73 (2003)
- Schimmel M, "A two-colour chewing gum test for masticatory efficiency: development of different assessment methods", J Oral Rehabil, 34, pp.671~678 (2007)
- Horie T, "Association between near occlusal contact areas and mixing ability", J Oral Rehabil, 41, pp.829~835 (2014)
- Henrikson T, "Masticatory efficiency and ability in relation to occlusion and mandibular dysfunction in girls", Int J Prosthodont, 11, pp.125~132 (1998)
- Tate GS, "Masticatory performance, muscle activity, and occlusal force in preorthognathic surgery patients", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 52, pp.476~481 (1994)
- Wilding RJ, "The association between chewing efficiency and occlusal contact area in man", Arch Oral Biol, 38, pp.589~596 (1993)
- Hatch JP, "Determinants of masticatory performance in dentate adults", Arch Oral Biol, 46, pp.641~648 (2001)
- Okiyama S, "Association between masticatory performance and maximal occlusal force in young men", J Oral Rehabil, 30, pp.278~282 (2003)
- Toro A, "Masticatory performance in children and adolescents with Class I and II malocclusions", Eur J Orthod, 28, pp.112~119 (2006)
- English JD, "Does malocclusion affect masticatory performance?", Angle Orthod, 72, pp.21~27 (2002)
- Iwase M, "Bite force, occlusal contact area and masticatory efficiency before and after orthognathic surgical correction of mandibular prognathism", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 35, pp.1102~1107 (2006)
- Choi YJ, "Twoyear follow-up of changes in bite force and occlusal contact area after intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy with and without Le Fort I osteotomy", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 43, pp.742~747 (2014)
- Katz MI, "Angle classification revisited. 1: Is current use reliable?", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 102, pp.173~179 (1992)
- Hyejoon Lee, "Comparison of occlusal contact areas of class I and class II molar relationships at finishing using three-dimensional digital models", 대한치과교정학회지, 45(3), pp.113~120 (2015), 대한치과교정학회
- Kim KH, "Cephalometric norms of the hard tissues of Korean for orthognathic surgery", J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg, 27, pp.221~230 (2001)
- Carlsson GE, "Masticatory efficiency: the effect of age, the loss of teeth and prosthetic rehabilitation", Int Dent J, 34, pp.93~97 (1984)
- Ackerman JL, "The characteristics of malocclusion: a modern approach to classification and diagnosis", Am J Orthod, 56, pp.443~454 (1969)
- Koshino H, "Tongue motor skills and masticatory performance in adult dentates, elderly dentates, and complete denture wearers", J Prosthet Dent, 77, pp.147~152 (1997)
- van den Braber W, "Chewing efficiency of pre-orthognathic surgery patients: selection and breakage of food particles", Eur J Oral Sci, 109, pp.306~311 (2001)
- Zhou Y, "Masticatory efficiency in skeletal class III malocclusion", Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi, 30, pp.72~74 (1995)
- Julien KC, "Normal masticatory performance in young adults and children", Arch Oral Biol, 41, pp.69~75 (1996)
- Owens S, "Masticatory performance and areas of occlusal contact and near contact in subjects with normal occlusion and malocclusion", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 121, pp.602~609 (2002)
- 윤혜림, "한국인에서의 부정교합 여부와 골격형태, 연령, 성별에 따른 교합력의 비교", 대한치과교정학회지, 40(5), pp.304~313 (2010), 대한치과교정학회
- Ando K, "A study on measuring occlusal contact area using silicone impression materials: an application of this method to the bite force measurement system using the pressure-sensitive sheet", Dent Mater J, 26, pp.898~905 (2007)
- Magalhães IB, "The influence of malocclusion on masticatory performance. A systematic review", Angle Orthod, 80, pp.981~987 (2010)