Changes in buccal facial depth of female patients after extraction and nonextraction orthodontic treatments: A preliminary study
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: This study was performed to investigate buccal facial depth (BFD) changes after extraction and nonextraction orthodontic treatments in post-adolescent and adult female patients, and to explore possible influencing factors. Methods: Twelve and nine female patients were enrolled in the extraction and nonextraction groups, respectively. Changes in BFD in the defined buccal region and six transverse and two coronal measuring planes were measured after registering pretreatment and posttreatment three-dimensional facial scans. Changes in posterior dentoalveolar arch widths were also measured. Treatment duration, changes in body mass index (BMI), and cephalometric variables were compared between the groups. Results: BFD in the buccal region decreased by approximately 1.45 mm in the extraction group, but no significant change was observed in the nonextraction group. In the extraction group, the decrease in BFD was identical between the two coronal measuring planes, whereas this differed among the six transverse measuring planes. Posterior dentoalveolar arch widths decreased in the extraction group, whereas these increased at the second premolar level in the nonextraction group. The treatment duration of the extraction group was twice that of the nonextraction group. No differences were found in BMI and Frankfort horizontal-mandibular plane angle changes between the groups. BFD changes in the buccal region moderately correlated with treatment duration and dental arch width change. Conclusions: BFD decreased in adult female patients undergoing extraction, and this may be influenced by the long treatment duration and constriction of dentoalveolar arch width. However, nonextraction treatment did not significantly alter BFD.[Korean J Orthod 2018;48(3):172-181]
Abstract
Objective: This study was performed to investigate buccal facial depth (BFD) changes after extraction and nonextraction orthodontic treatments in post-adolescent and adult female patients, and to explore possible influencing factors. Methods: Twelve and nine female patients were enrolled in the extraction and nonextraction groups, respectively. Changes in BFD in the defined buccal region and six transverse and two coronal measuring planes were measured after registering pretreatment and posttreatment three-dimensional facial scans. Changes in posterior dentoalveolar arch widths were also measured. Treatment duration, changes in body mass index (BMI), and cephalometric variables were compared between the groups. Results: BFD in the buccal region decreased by approximately 1.45 mm in the extraction group, but no significant change was observed in the nonextraction group. In the extraction group, the decrease in BFD was identical between the two coronal measuring planes, whereas this differed among the six transverse measuring planes. Posterior dentoalveolar arch widths decreased in the extraction group, whereas these increased at the second premolar level in the nonextraction group. The treatment duration of the extraction group was twice that of the nonextraction group. No differences were found in BMI and Frankfort horizontal-mandibular plane angle changes between the groups. BFD changes in the buccal region moderately correlated with treatment duration and dental arch width change. Conclusions: BFD decreased in adult female patients undergoing extraction, and this may be influenced by the long treatment duration and constriction of dentoalveolar arch width. However, nonextraction treatment did not significantly alter BFD.[Korean J Orthod 2018;48(3):172-181]
참고문헌 (28)
- Luppanapornlarp S, "The effects of premolar-extraction: a long-term comparison of outcomes in "clear-cut" extraction and nonextraction Class II patients", Angle Orthod, 63, pp.257~272 (1993)
- Scott SH, "The perceived impact of extraction and nonextraction treatments on matched samples of African American patients", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 116, pp.352~360 (1999)[DOI]
- Bowman SJ, "The esthetic impact of extraction and nonextraction treatments on Caucasian patients", Angle Orthod, 70, pp.3~10 (2000)
- Basciftci FA, "Effects of extraction and nonextraction treatment on class I and class II subjects", Angle Orthod, 73, pp.36~42 (2003)
- Wholley CJ, "The effects of commonly prescribed premolar extraction sequences on the curvature of the upper and lower lips", Angle Orthod, 73, pp.386~395 (2003)
- Bishara SE, "Changes in facial dimensions assessed from lateral and frontal photographs. Part I--Methodology", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 108, pp.389~393 (1995)[DOI]
- Moss JP, "Three-dimensional assessment of treatment outcomes on the face", Orthod Craniofac Res, 6(Suppl 1), pp.126~131 (2003)[DOI]
- Hajeer MY, "Applications of 3D imaging in orthodontics: part I", J Orthod, 31, pp.62~70 (2004)[DOI]
- Kau CH, "Three-dimensional surface acquisition systems for the study of facial morphology and their application to maxillofacial surgery", Int J Med Robot, 3, pp.97~110 (2007)[DOI]
- Kau CH, "Three-dimensional analysis of facial morphology surface changes in untreated children from 12 to 14 years of age", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 134, pp.751~760 (2008)[DOI]
- Alqattan M, "Comparison between landmark and surface-based three-dimensional analyses of facial asymmetry in adults", Eur J Orthod, 37, pp.1~12 (2015)[DOI]
- Nkenke E, "Determination of facial symmetry in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients from threedimensional data: technical report and assessment of measurement errors", Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 43, pp.129~137 (2006)[DOI]
- Chen G, "Stable region for maxillary dental cast superimposition in adults, studied with the aid of stable miniscrews", Orthod Craniofac Res, 14, pp.70~79 (2011)[DOI]
- Coetzee V, "Deciphering faces: quantifiable visual cues to weight", Perception, 39, pp.51~61 (2010)[DOI]
- Miller L, "Visualizing threedimensional facial soft tissue changes following orthognathic surgery", Eur J Orthod, 29, pp.14~20 (2007)[DOI]
- Alves PV, "Threedimensional facial surface analysis of patients with skeletal malocclusion", J Craniofac Surg, 20, pp.290~296 (2009)[DOI]
- Baik HS, "Facial soft-tissue changes in skeletal Class III orthognathic surgery patients analyzed with 3-dimensional laser scanning", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 138, pp.167~178 (2010)[DOI]
- Ismail SF, "Three-dimensional assessment of the effects of extraction and nonextraction orthodontic treatment on the face", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 121, pp.244~256 (2002)[DOI]
- 2.0.CO;2,
- Alomari SA, "Occlusal bite force changes during 6 months of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances", Aust Orthod J, 28, pp.197~203 (2012)
- Kiliaridis S, "Masseter muscle thickness as a predictive variable in treatment outcome of the twin-block appliance and masseteric thickness changes during treatment", Orthod Craniofac Res, 13, pp.203~213 (2010)[DOI]
- Coleman SR, "The anatomy of the aging face: volume loss and changes in 3-dimensional topography", Aesthet Surg J, 26, pp.S4~S9 (2006)[DOI]
- Sarver D, "The aesthetic dentofacial analysis", Clin Plast Surg, 34, pp.369~394 (2007)[DOI]
- Richard MJ, "Analysis of the anatomic changes of the aging facial skeleton using computer-assisted tomography", Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg, 25, pp.382~386 (2009)[DOI]
- Waldman BH, "Change in lip contour with maxillary incisor retraction", Angle Orthod, 52, pp.129~134 (1982)
- Jamilian A, "Changes in facial profile during orthodontic treatment with extraction of four first premolars", Orthod Waves, 67, pp.157~161 (2008)[DOI]
- Bishara SE, "Treatment and posttreatment changes in patients with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion after extraction and nonextraction treatment", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 111, pp.18~27 (1997)[DOI]
- Kim E, "Extraction vs nonextraction: arch widths and smile esthetics", Angle Orthod, 73, pp.354~358 (2003)