Smile esthetics: Evaluation of long-term changes in the transverse dimension
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: To analyze the long-term changes in maxillary arch widths and buccal corridor ratios in orthodontic patients treated with and without premolar extractions. Methods: The study included 53 patients who were divided into the extraction (n = 28) and nonextraction (n = 25) groups. These patients had complete orthodontic records from the pretreatment (T1), posttreatment (T2), and postretention (T3) periods. Their mean retention and postretention times were 4 years 2 months and 17 years 8 months, respectively. Dental models and smiling photographs from all three periods were digitized to compare the changes in three dental arch width measurements and three buccal corridor ratios over time between the extraction and nonextraction groups. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance tests. Post-hoc multiple comparisons were made using Bonferroni correction. Results: Soft-tissue extension during smiling increased with age in both groups. The maximum dental width to smile width ratio (MDW/SW) also showed a favorable increase with treatment in both groups (p < 0.05), and remained virtually stable at T3 (p > 0.05). According to the MDW/SW ratio, the mean difference in the buccal corridor space of the two groups was 2.4 ± 0.2% at T3. Additionally, no significant group × time interaction was found for any of the buccal corridor ratios studied. Conclusions: Premolar extractions did not negatively affect transverse maxillary arch widths and buccal corridor ratios. The long-term outcome of orthodontic treatment was comparable between the study groups.[Korean J Orthod 2017;47(2):100-107]
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the long-term changes in maxillary arch widths and buccal corridor ratios in orthodontic patients treated with and without premolar extractions. Methods: The study included 53 patients who were divided into the extraction (n = 28) and nonextraction (n = 25) groups. These patients had complete orthodontic records from the pretreatment (T1), posttreatment (T2), and postretention (T3) periods. Their mean retention and postretention times were 4 years 2 months and 17 years 8 months, respectively. Dental models and smiling photographs from all three periods were digitized to compare the changes in three dental arch width measurements and three buccal corridor ratios over time between the extraction and nonextraction groups. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance tests. Post-hoc multiple comparisons were made using Bonferroni correction. Results: Soft-tissue extension during smiling increased with age in both groups. The maximum dental width to smile width ratio (MDW/SW) also showed a favorable increase with treatment in both groups (p < 0.05), and remained virtually stable at T3 (p > 0.05). According to the MDW/SW ratio, the mean difference in the buccal corridor space of the two groups was 2.4 ± 0.2% at T3. Additionally, no significant group × time interaction was found for any of the buccal corridor ratios studied. Conclusions: Premolar extractions did not negatively affect transverse maxillary arch widths and buccal corridor ratios. The long-term outcome of orthodontic treatment was comparable between the study groups.[Korean J Orthod 2017;47(2):100-107]
참고문헌 (23)
- Ioi H, "Effects of buccal corridors on smile esthetics in Japanese", Angle Orthod, 79, pp.628~633 (2009)
- Martin AJ, "The impact of buccal corridors on smile attractiveness", Eur J Orthod, 29, pp.530~537 (2007)
- Zange SE, "Perceptions of laypersons and orthodontists regarding the buccal corridor in long- and short-face individuals", Angle Orthod, 81, pp.86~90 (2011)
- Chang CA, "Smile esthetics from patients' perspectives for faces of varying attractiveness", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 140, pp.e171~e180 (2011)
- Parekh SM, "Attractiveness of variations in the smile arc and buccal corridor space as judged by orthodontists and laymen", Angle Orthod, 76, pp.557~563 (2006)
- Ioi H, "Effects of buccal corridors on smile esthetics in Japanese and Korean orthodontists and orthodontic patients", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 142, pp.459~465 (2012)
- Ghafari JG, "Emerging paradigms in orthodonticsan essay", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 111, pp.573~580 (1997)
- Spahl TJ, "Premolar extractions and smile esthetics", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 124, pp.16A~17A (2003)
- Johnson DK, "Smile esthetics after orthodontic treatment with and without extraction of four first premolars", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 108, pp.162~167 (1995)
- Kim E, "Extraction vs nonextraction:arch widths and smile esthetics", Angle Orthod, 73, pp.354~358 (2003)
- Gianelly AA, "Arch width after extraction and nonextraction treatment", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 123, pp.25~28 (2003)
- Yang IH, "Which hard and soft tissue factors relate with the amount of buccal corridor space during smiling?", Angle Orthod, 78, pp.5~11 (2008)
- Akyalcin S, "Do long-term changes in relative maxillary arch width affect buccal-corridor ratios in extraction and nonextraction treatment?", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 139, pp.356~361 (2011)
- Meyer AH, "Maxillary arch width and buccal corridor changes with orthodontic treatment. Part 1: differences between premolar extraction and nonextraction treatment outcomes", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 145, pp.207~216 (2014)
- Janson G, "Influence of orthodontic treatment, midline position, buccal corridor and smile arc on smile attractiveness", Angle Orthod, 81, pp.153~161 (2011)
- Krishnan V, "Characterization of posed smile by using visual analog scale, smile arc, buccal corridor measures, and modified smile index", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 133, pp.515~523 (2008)
- Sarver DM, "Dynamic smile visualization and quantification: part 1. Evolution of the concept and dynamic records for smile capture", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 124, pp.4~12 (2003)
- Sarver DM, "Dynamic smile visualization and quantification: part 2. Smile analysis and treatment strategies", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 124, pp.116~127 (2003)
- Dahlberg G, "Statistical methods for medical and biological students", pp.122~132 (1940), Allen and Unwin Publishing
- Bishara SE, "The morphologic basis for the extraction decision in Class II, division 1 malocclusions: a comparative study", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 107, pp.129~135 (1995)
- Saelens NA, "Therapeutic changes in extraction versus non-extraction orthodontic treatment", Eur J Orthod, 20, pp.225~236 (1998)
- Francisconi MF, "Overjet, overbite, and anterior crowding relapses in extraction and nonextraction patients, and their correlations", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 146, pp.67~72 (2014)
- Maulik C, "Dynamic smile analysis in young adults", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 132, pp.307~315 (2007)