Comparison of three midsagittal planes for threedimensional cone beam computed tomography head reorientation
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: This study compared three prominent midsagittal planes (MSPs) to identify the MSP that best approximates the true symmetrical MSP. Methods: Forty-three patients (mean age, 23.0 ± 8.20 years) were grouped as follows: group 1 consisted of 10 patients with skeletal Class I and a menton (Me) deviation of < 2 mm; group 2, 11 patients with skeletal Class III and a Me deviation < 2 mm; group 3, nine patients with skeletal Class III and a Me deviation of 2 to less than 4 mm; and group 4, 13 patients with skeletal Class III and an Me deviation ≥ 4 mm. The candidate MSPs were established by three-dimensional (3D) cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) reorientation methods (RMs): (1) the MSP perpendicular to the Frankfort horizontal (FH) plane while passing through the crista galli and basion; (2) the MSP including the nasion, incisive foramen, and basion; (3) the MSP including the nasion, anterior nasal spine, and posterior nasal spine. The mean absolute distances (MADs) to the MSPs were calculated from the coordinates of 1,548 points on 129 CBCT images. The differences in the values of the 3D coordinates among RMs were compared. Results: The MADs of the three RMs showed significant differences (p < 0.05). Most of the differences in values of the coordinates were not significant among RMs. Conclusions: Although the differences in distance among the three MSPs were minor, the MSP perpendicular to the FH plane while passing through the crista galli and basion best approximated the true symmetrical MSP.
Abstract
Objective: This study compared three prominent midsagittal planes (MSPs) to identify the MSP that best approximates the true symmetrical MSP. Methods: Forty-three patients (mean age, 23.0 ± 8.20 years) were grouped as follows: group 1 consisted of 10 patients with skeletal Class I and a menton (Me) deviation of < 2 mm; group 2, 11 patients with skeletal Class III and a Me deviation < 2 mm; group 3, nine patients with skeletal Class III and a Me deviation of 2 to less than 4 mm; and group 4, 13 patients with skeletal Class III and an Me deviation ≥ 4 mm. The candidate MSPs were established by three-dimensional (3D) cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) reorientation methods (RMs): (1) the MSP perpendicular to the Frankfort horizontal (FH) plane while passing through the crista galli and basion; (2) the MSP including the nasion, incisive foramen, and basion; (3) the MSP including the nasion, anterior nasal spine, and posterior nasal spine. The mean absolute distances (MADs) to the MSPs were calculated from the coordinates of 1,548 points on 129 CBCT images. The differences in the values of the 3D coordinates among RMs were compared. Results: The MADs of the three RMs showed significant differences (p < 0.05). Most of the differences in values of the coordinates were not significant among RMs. Conclusions: Although the differences in distance among the three MSPs were minor, the MSP perpendicular to the FH plane while passing through the crista galli and basion best approximated the true symmetrical MSP.
참고문헌 (30)
- Kim SJ, "Threedimensional effect of pitch, roll, and yaw rotations on maxillomandibular complex movement", J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 43, pp.264~273 (2015)
- Rohr R, "Landmark-based image analysis: using geometric and intensity models" (2001), Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Cevidanes LH, "Image analysis and superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 129, pp.611~618 (2006)
- Andresen PR, "Surface-bounded growth modeling applied to human mandibles", IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 19, pp.1053~1063 (2000)
- da Motta AT, "Superimposition of 3D cone-beam CT models in orthognathic surgery", Dental Press J Orthod, 15, pp.39~41 (2010)
- Ludlow JB, "Precision of cephalometric landmark identification : conebeam computed tomography vs conventional cephalometric views", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 136, pp.312~ (2009)
- Gupta A, "Precision of manual landmark identification between as-received and oriented volume-rendered cone-beam computed tomography images", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 151, pp.118~131 (2017)
- Damstra J, "A three-dimensional comparison of a morphometric and conventional cephalometric midsagittal planes for craniofacial asymmetry", Clin Oral Investig, 16, pp.285~294 (2012)
- Green MN, "A simple and accurate craniofacial midsagittal plane definition", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 152, pp.355~363 (2017)
- Shin SM, "Statistical shape analysis-based determination of optimal midsagittal reference plane for evaluation of facial asymmetry", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 150, pp.252~260 (2016)
- Moyers RE, "The inappropriateness of conventional cephalometrics", Am J Orthod, 75, pp.599~671 (1979)
- 고은희, "정모두부방사선사진 촬영시 두부의 수직회전에 따른 투사오차", 대한치과교정학회지, 33(2), pp.73~84 (2003), 대한치과교정학회
- Solow B, "Natural head position in standing subjects", Acta Odontol Scand, 29, pp.591~607 (1971)
- Cooke MS, "The reproducibility of natural head posture : a methodological study", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 93, pp.280~288 (1988)
- Weber DW, "Three-dimensional reproducibility of natural head position", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 143, pp.738~744 (2013)
- Park JU, "Assessment of asymmetry in a normal occlusion sample and asymmetric patients with three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography: a study for a transverse reference plane", Angle Orthod, 82, pp.860~867 (2012)
- Miyashita K, "Contemporary cephalometric radiography" (1996), Quintessence
- Pil-Kyo Jung, "Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography cephalometric measurements using a midsagittal projection and conventional two-dimensional cephalometric measurements", 대한치과교정학회지, 45(6), pp.282~288 (2015), 대한치과교정학회
- Naji P, "Reliability of anatomic structures as landmarks in three-dimensional cephalometric analysis using CBCT", Angle Orthod, 84, pp.762~772 (2014)
- Gribel BF, "Accuracy and reliability of craniometric measurements on lateral cephalometry and 3D measurements on CBCT scans", Angle Orthod, 81, pp.26~35 (2011)
- Hwang HS, "Maxillofacial 3-dimensional image analysis for the diagnosis of facial asymmetry", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 130, pp.779~785 (2006)
- Kim HJ, "Construction and validation of the midsagittal reference plane based on the skull base symmetry for three-dimensional cephalometric craniofacial analysis", J Craniofac Surg, 25, pp.338~342 (2014)
- An S, "Comparison of different midsagittal plane configurations for evaluating craniofacial asymmetry by expert preference", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 152, pp.788~797 (2017)
- Lagravère MO, "Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliabilities of landmark identification on digitized lateral cephalograms and formatted 3-dimensional cone-beam computerized tomography images", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 137, pp.598~604 (2010)
- Lou L, "Accuracy of measurements and reliability of landmark identification with computed tomography(CT)techniques in the maxillofacial area : a systematic review", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 104, pp.402~411 (2007)
- Bjehin R, "A comparison between the Frankfort horizontal and the sella turcica-nasion as reference planes in cephalometric analysis", Acta Odontol Scand, 15, pp.1~12 (1957)
- Ricketts RM, "Orientationsella-nasion or Frankfort horizontal", Am J Orthod, 69, pp.648~654 (1976)
- Severt TR, "The prevalence of facial asymmetry in the dentofacial deformities population at the University of North Carolina", Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, 12, pp.171~176 (1997)
- Kwon TG, "A comparison of craniofacial morphology in patients with and without facial asymmetry--a three-dimensional analysis with computed tomography", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 35, pp.43~48 (2006)
- Ruellas AC, "Common 3-dimensional coordinate system for assessment of directional changes", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 149, pp.645~656 (2016)