Comparison of the bonding strengths of second- and third-generation light-emitting diode light-curing units
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: With the introduction of third-generation light-emitting diodes (LEDs) in dental practice, it is necessary to compare their bracket-bonding effects, safety, and efficacy with those of the second-generation units. Methods: In this study, 80 extracted human premolars were randomly divided into eight groups of 10 samples each. Metal or polycrystalline ceramic brackets were bonded on the teeth using second- or third-generation LED light-curing units (LCUs), according to the manufacturers’ instructions. The shear bond strengths were measured using the universal testing machine, and the adhesive remnant index (ARI) was scored by assessing the residual resin on the surfaces of debonded teeth using a scanning electron microscope. In addition, curing times were also measured. Results: The shear bond strengths in all experimental groups were higher than the acceptable clinical shear bond strengths, regardless of the curing unit used. In both LED LCU groups, all ceramic bracket groups showed significantly higher shear bond strengths than did the metal bracket groups except the plasma emulation group which showed no significant difference. When comparing units within the same bracket type, no differences in shear bond strength were observed between the second- and third-generation unit groups. Additionally, no significant differences were observed among the groups for the ARI. Conclusions: The bracket-bonding effects and ARIs of second- and third-generation LED LCUs showed few differences, and most were without statistical significance; however, the curing time was shorter for the second-generation unit.[Korean J Orthod 2016;46(6):364-371]
Abstract
Objective: With the introduction of third-generation light-emitting diodes (LEDs) in dental practice, it is necessary to compare their bracket-bonding effects, safety, and efficacy with those of the second-generation units. Methods: In this study, 80 extracted human premolars were randomly divided into eight groups of 10 samples each. Metal or polycrystalline ceramic brackets were bonded on the teeth using second- or third-generation LED light-curing units (LCUs), according to the manufacturers’ instructions. The shear bond strengths were measured using the universal testing machine, and the adhesive remnant index (ARI) was scored by assessing the residual resin on the surfaces of debonded teeth using a scanning electron microscope. In addition, curing times were also measured. Results: The shear bond strengths in all experimental groups were higher than the acceptable clinical shear bond strengths, regardless of the curing unit used. In both LED LCU groups, all ceramic bracket groups showed significantly higher shear bond strengths than did the metal bracket groups except the plasma emulation group which showed no significant difference. When comparing units within the same bracket type, no differences in shear bond strength were observed between the second- and third-generation unit groups. Additionally, no significant differences were observed among the groups for the ARI. Conclusions: The bracket-bonding effects and ARIs of second- and third-generation LED LCUs showed few differences, and most were without statistical significance; however, the curing time was shorter for the second-generation unit.[Korean J Orthod 2016;46(6):364-371]
참고문헌 (28)
- Flury S, "Light curing through glass ceramics with a second- and a thirdgeneration LED curing unit: effect of curing mode on the degree of conversion of dual-curing resin cements", Clin Oral Investig, 17, pp.2127~2137 (2013)
- Price RB, "Factors affecting the energy delivered to simulated class I and class v preparations", J Can Dent Assoc, 76, pp.a94~ (2010)
- Dall’Igna CM, "Effect of curing time on the bond strength of a bracket-bonding system cured with a light-emitting diode or plasma arc light", Eur J Orthod, 33, pp.55~59 (2011)
- Swanson T, "Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with light-emitting diode curing units at various polymerization times", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 125, pp.337~341 (2004)
- Rueggeberg FA, "State-of-the-art : dental photocuring--a review", Dent Mater, 27, pp.39~52 (2011)
- 이정환, "Resin bonding of metal brackets to glazed zirconia with a porcelain primer", 대한치과교정학회지, 45(6), pp.299~307 (2015), 대한치과교정학회
- Ji-Yeon Lee, "Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets using various zirconia primers", 대한치과교정학회지, 45(4), pp.164~170 (2015), 대한치과교정학회
- Mills RW, "Dental composite depth of cure with halogen and blue light emitting diode technology", Br Dent J, 186, pp.388~391 (1999)
- Uhl A, "Second generation LEDs for the polymerization of oral biomaterials", Dent Mater, 20, pp.80~87 (2004)
- Flury S, "Light curing through glass ceramics: effect of curing mode on micromechanical properties of dual-curing resin cements", Clin Oral Investig, 18, pp.809~818 (2014)
- Spranley TJ, "Curing light burns", Gen Dent, 60, pp.e210~e214 (2012)
- Bruzell Roll EM, "Health hazards associated with curing light in the dental clinic", Clin Oral Investig, 8, pp.113~117 (2004)
- Jandt KD, "A brief history of LED photopolymerization", Dent Mater, 29, pp.605~617 (2013)
- Malkoç S, "In-vitro assessment of temperature rise in the pulp during orthodontic bonding", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 137, pp.379~383 (2010)
- 차정열, "광중합기의 광원에 따른 브라켓 전단결합강도 비교", 대한치과교정학회지, 36(3), pp.198~206 (2006), 대한치과교정학회
- Mavropoulos A, "Kinetics of light-cure bracket bonding: power density vs exposure duration", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 134, pp.543~547 (2008)
- 강지은, "발광 다이오드 광중합기의 복합레진 중합 평가", 대한소아치과학회지, 41(2), pp.152~156 (2014), 대한소아치과학회[DOI]
- 권태훈, "항미생물제제를 포함한 self-etching primer로 접착한 세라믹 브라켓의 전단 결합 강도", 대한치과교정학회지, 41(1), pp.16~24 (2011), 대한치과교정학회
- Judy RH, "Effective single-charge end point of cordless light-emitting diode light-curing units", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 130, pp.378~384 (2006)
- International Organization for Standardization, "ISO", TS 11405: 2003(E). Dentistry: Dental materials:testing of adhesion to tooth structure, 2003
- Artun J, "Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment", Am J Orthod, 85, pp.333~340 (1984)
- Wiggins KM, "Curing performance of a new-generation lightemitting diode dental curing unit", J Am Dent Assoc, 135, pp.1471~1479 (2004)
- Reynolds IR, "A review of direct orthodontic bonding", Br J Orthod, 2, pp.171~178 (1975)
- Eslamian L, "A comparative study of shear bond strength between metal and ceramic brackets and artificially aged composite restorations using different surface treatments", Eur J Orthod, 34, pp.610~617 (2012)
- Reddy YG, "The shear bond strengths of metal and ceramic brackets: An in-vitro comparative study", J Clin Diagn Res, 7, pp.1495~1497 (2013)
- Eliades T, "Direct light transmittance through ceramic brackets", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 107, pp.11~19 (1995)
- Graber TM, "Risk management in orthodontics: Experts’ guide to malpractice. Surrey", pp.25~ (2004), Quintessence Books
- Bishara SE, "Ceramic brackets: something old, something new, a review", Semin Orthod, 3, pp.178~188 (1997)