Evaluation of factors influencing the success rate of orthodontic microimplants using panoramic radiographs
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate factors influencing the success rate of orthodontic microimplants (OMIs) using panoramic radiographs (PRs). Methods: We examined 160 OMIs inserted bilaterally in the maxillary buccal alveolar bone between the second premolars and first molars of 80 patients (51 women, 29 men; mean age, 18.0 ± 6.1 years) undergoing treatment for malocclusion. The angulation and position of OMIs, as well as other para-meters, were measured on PRs. The correlation between each measurement and the OMI success rate was then evaluated. Results: The overall success rate was 85.0% (136/160). Age was found to be a significant predictor of implant success (p < 0.05), while sex, side of placement, extraction, and position of the OMI tip were not significant predictors (p > 0.05). The highest success rate was observed for OMIs with tips positioned on the interradicular midline (IRML; central position). Univariate analyses revealed that the OMI success rate signifi-cantly increased with an increase in the OMI length and placement height of OMI (p = 0.001). However, in simultaneous analyses, only length remained sig-nificant (p = 0.027). Root proximity, distance between the OMI tip and IRML, interradicular distance, alveolar crest width, distance between the OMI head and IRML, and placement angle were not factors for success. Correlations between the placement angle and all other measurements except root proximity were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that OMIs positioned more apically with a lesser angulation, as observed on PRs, exhibit high success rates.[Korean J Orthod 2018;48(1):30-38]
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate factors influencing the success rate of orthodontic microimplants (OMIs) using panoramic radiographs (PRs). Methods: We examined 160 OMIs inserted bilaterally in the maxillary buccal alveolar bone between the second premolars and first molars of 80 patients (51 women, 29 men; mean age, 18.0 ± 6.1 years) undergoing treatment for malocclusion. The angulation and position of OMIs, as well as other para-meters, were measured on PRs. The correlation between each measurement and the OMI success rate was then evaluated. Results: The overall success rate was 85.0% (136/160). Age was found to be a significant predictor of implant success (p < 0.05), while sex, side of placement, extraction, and position of the OMI tip were not significant predictors (p > 0.05). The highest success rate was observed for OMIs with tips positioned on the interradicular midline (IRML; central position). Univariate analyses revealed that the OMI success rate signifi-cantly increased with an increase in the OMI length and placement height of OMI (p = 0.001). However, in simultaneous analyses, only length remained sig-nificant (p = 0.027). Root proximity, distance between the OMI tip and IRML, interradicular distance, alveolar crest width, distance between the OMI head and IRML, and placement angle were not factors for success. Correlations between the placement angle and all other measurements except root proximity were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that OMIs positioned more apically with a lesser angulation, as observed on PRs, exhibit high success rates.[Korean J Orthod 2018;48(1):30-38]
참고문헌 (32)
- Min KI, "Root proximity and cortical bone thickness effects on the success rate of orthodontic microimplants using cone beam computed tomography", Angle Orthod, 82, pp.1014~1021 (2012)[DOI]
- Jung YR, "Placement angle effects on the success rate of orthodontic microimplants and other factors with cone-beam computed tomography", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 143, pp.173~181 (2013)[DOI]
- Lee MY, "Bone density effects on the success rate of orthodontic microimplants evaluated with cone-beam computed tomography", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 149, pp.217~224 (2016)[DOI]
- Deguchi T, "Quantitative evaluation of cortical bone thickness with computed tomographic scanning for orthodontic implants", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 129, pp.721.e7~721.e12 (2006)
- Lim HJ, "Factors associated with initial stability of miniscrews for orthodontic treatment", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 136, pp.236~242 (2009)[DOI]
- Joo E, "Radiographic evaluation of interdental distance for orthodontic miniscrew application", pp.2004
- Kim SH, "Evaluation of interdental space of the maxillary posterior area for orthodontic mini-implants with cone-beam computed tomography", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 135, pp.635~641 (2009)[DOI]
- 임주은, "하악의 교정용 미니 임플랜트 식립 부위에서의 피질골 두께와 치근간 거리: 3차원으로 재구성한 CT 영상을 이용한 연구", 대한치과교정학회지, 38(6), pp.397~406 (2008), 대한치과교정학회
- Kuroda S, "Root proximity is a major factor for screw failure in orthodontic anchorage", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 131(4 Suppl), pp.S68~S73 (2007)[DOI]
- Schnelle MA, "A radiographic evaluation of the availability of bone for placement of miniscrews", Angle Orthod, 74, pp.832~837 (2004)
- Dudic A, "Detection of apical root resorption after orthodontic treatment by using panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography of super-high resolution", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 135, pp.434~437 (2009)[DOI]
- Cha JY, "Incidental findings in the maxillofacial area with 3-dimensional conebeam imaging", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 132, pp.7~14 (2007)[DOI]
- Nakagawa Y, "Preoperative application of limited cone beam computerized tomography as an assessment tool before minor oral surgery", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 31, pp.322~326 (2002)[DOI]
- Bennemann R, "Evaluating miniscrew position using orthopantomograms compared to cone-beam computed tomography", J Orofac Orthop, 73, pp.236~248 (2012)[DOI]
- Larheim TA, "Reproducibility of rotational panoramic radiography: mandibular linear dimensions and angles", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 90, pp.45~51 (1986)[DOI]
- Stewart JA, "Factors that relate to treatment duration for patients with palatally impacted maxillary canines", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 119, pp.216~225 (2001)[DOI]
- Yitschaky M, "Prediction of premolar tooth lengths based on their panoramic radiographic lengths", Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 33, pp.370~372 (2004)[DOI]
- Hyomoto M, "Clinical conditions for eruption of maxillary canines and mandibular premolars associated with dentigerous cysts", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 124, pp.515~520 (2003)[DOI]
- Mckee IW, "The effect of vertical and horizontal head positioning in panoramic radiography on mesiodistal tooth angulations", Angle Orthod, 71, pp.442~451 (2001)
- Kambylafkas P, "Validity of panoramic radiographs for measuring mandibular asymmetry", Angle Orthod, 76, pp.388~393 (2006)
- Mckee IW, "The accuracy of 4 panoramic units in the projection of mesiodistal tooth angulations", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 121, pp.166~175 (2002)[DOI]
- Stramotas S, "Accuracy of linear and angular measurements on panoramic radiographs taken at various positions in vitro", Eur J Orthod, 24, pp.43~52 (2002)[DOI]
- Sima Nikneshan, "Evaluation of the accuracy of linear and angular measurements on panoramic radiographs taken at different positions", Imaging Science in Dentistry, 43(3), pp.191~196 (2013), 대한영상치의학회
- 최보람, "Clinical image quality evaluation for panoramic radiography in Korean dental clinics", Imaging Science in Dentistry, 42(3), pp.183~190 (2012), 대한영상치의학회
- Alrbata RH, "Optimal force magnitude loaded to orthodontic microimplants: a finite element analysis", Angle Orthod, 86, pp.221~226 (2016)[DOI]
- Papageorgiou SN, "Failure rates and associated risk factors of orthodontic miniscrew implants: a meta-analysis", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 142, pp.577~595 (2012)[DOI]
- Dalessandri D, "Determinants for success rates of temporary anchorage devices in orthodontics: a meta-analysis (n > 50)", Eur J Orthod, 36, pp.303~313 (2014)[DOI]
- Mayoral G, "Treatment results with light wires studied by panoramic radiography", Am J Orthod, 81, pp.489~497 (1982)[DOI]
- Lucchesi MV, "Suitability of the panoramic radiograph for assessment of mesiodistal angulation of teeth in the buccal segments of the mandible", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 94, pp.303~310 (1988)[DOI]
- Ursi WJ, "Assessment of mesiodistal axial inclination through panoramic radiography", J Clin Orthod, 24, pp.166~173 (1990)
- Sung-Bin Hong, "Prognostic factors associated with the success rates of posterior orthodontic miniscrew implants: A subgroup meta-analysis", 대한치과교정학회지, 46(2), pp.111~126 (2016), 대한치과교정학회
- Larheim TA, "Determination of tooth length with a standardized paralleling technique and calibrated radiographic measuring film", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 48, pp.374~378 (1979)[DOI]
