Impact of Justice and Information Sharing on Logistics Performance in Supply Chain
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: This paper aims to reveal similarities and differences in behaviors in negative consumer-brand relationships. Thus, we focused on consumer motivation which includes intensity and direction of behaviors. The motivation for negative customer behavior has been discussed in the context of brand hate, but there is only limited research that has tried to measure it using quantitative methods. We are trying to measure customers' motivation in negative consumer-brand relationships and reveal the relationship between in-field customers’ negative behaviors. Research design, data, and methodology: We adopt Reactive-Proactive aggression to measure the motivation of customers' behaviors in a negative consumer-brand relationship. Also, to reveal the relationship between in-field behavior and customer aggression, we survey Korean game communities to reactive-proactive aggression and behaviors, whether they participate, in each observed behavior during the serial negative consumer movements that occurred in the Korean game industry. As a methodology, we run multinomial logistic regression. Results: We observed 9 behaviors in this case, and we found that reactive-proactive aggression is related to participation and motivation of these behaviors. Conclusions: We suggest the potential of reactive-proactive aggression as motivation for customers' complex negative behaviors. Based on this potential, we hope reactive-proactive aggression could be used to reveal similarities and differences in behaviors in negative consumer-brand relationships.
Abstract
Purpose: This paper aims to reveal similarities and differences in behaviors in negative consumer-brand relationships. Thus, we focused on consumer motivation which includes intensity and direction of behaviors. The motivation for negative customer behavior has been discussed in the context of brand hate, but there is only limited research that has tried to measure it using quantitative methods. We are trying to measure customers' motivation in negative consumer-brand relationships and reveal the relationship between in-field customers’ negative behaviors. Research design, data, and methodology: We adopt Reactive-Proactive aggression to measure the motivation of customers' behaviors in a negative consumer-brand relationship. Also, to reveal the relationship between in-field behavior and customer aggression, we survey Korean game communities to reactive-proactive aggression and behaviors, whether they participate, in each observed behavior during the serial negative consumer movements that occurred in the Korean game industry. As a methodology, we run multinomial logistic regression. Results: We observed 9 behaviors in this case, and we found that reactive-proactive aggression is related to participation and motivation of these behaviors. Conclusions: We suggest the potential of reactive-proactive aggression as motivation for customers' complex negative behaviors. Based on this potential, we hope reactive-proactive aggression could be used to reveal similarities and differences in behaviors in negative consumer-brand relationships.
참고문헌 (50)
- Adams, J. S., "Towards an understanding of inequity", The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(5), pp.422~436 (1963)
- Adnani, L., "The role of innovation and information sharing in supply chain management and business performance of halal products in tourism destinations", Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 11(1), pp.195~202 (2023)
- Anderson, E., "Determinants of continuity in conventional industrial channel dyads", Marketing Science, 8(4), pp.310~323 (1989)
- Anthony, T., "Supply chain collaboration : Success in the new internet economy", Achieving Supply Chain Excellence through Technology, 2, pp.41~44 (2000)
- Bokrantz, J., "Building and testing necessity theories in supply chain management", Journal of Supply Chain Management, 59(1), pp.48~65 (2023)
- Bowersox, D. J., "Emerging patterns of logistical organization", Journal of Business Logistics, 8(1), pp.46~ (1987)
- Brockner, J., "An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions : Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures", Psychological Bulletin, 120(2), pp.189~208 (1996)
- Caney, S., "International distributive justice", Political Studies, 49(5), pp.974~997 (2001)
- Chopra, S., "Strategy, planning, and operation", Supply Chain Management, 15(5), pp.71~85 (2001)
- Colquitt, J. A., "On the dimensionality of organizational justice : A construct validation of a measure", Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), pp.386~400 (2001)
- Colquitt, J. A., "Justice at the millennium : A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research", Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), pp.425~445 (2001)
- Colquitt, J. A., "Forever focused on fairness : 75 years of organizational justice in personnel psychology", Personnel Psychology, 76(2), pp.413~435 (2023)
- Cugueró-Escofet, N., "Sustainable human resource management : How to create a knowledge sharing behavior through organizational justice, organizational support, satisfaction and commitment", Sustainability, 11(19), pp.5419~ (2019)
- De Clercq, D., "Knowledge-sharing efforts and employee creative behavior : The invigorating roles of passion for work, time sufficiency and procedural justice", Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(5), pp.1131~1155 (2020)
- De Cremer, D., "How do leaders promote cooperation? The effects of charisma and procedural fairness", Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), pp.858~866 (2002)
- Ellis, K. M., "The effects of procedural and informational justice in the integration of related acquisitions", Strategic Management Journal, 30(2), pp.137~161 (2009)
- Gleason, J. M., "Toward valid measures of public sector productivity : Performance measures in urban transit", Management Science, 28(4), pp.379~386 (1982)
- Goel, R. K., "Supply chain performance and economic growth : The impact of COVID-19 disruptions", Journal of Policy Modeling, 43(2), pp.298~316 (2021)
- Griffith, D. A., "Social exchange in supply chain relationships : The resulting benefits of procedural and distributive justice", Journal of Operations Management, 24(2), pp.85~98 (2006)
- Hair, J. F., "Multivariate data analysis" (2010), Pearson
- Holland, C. P., "Cooperative supply chain management : The impact of interorganizational information systems", The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 4(2), pp.117~133 (1995)
- Homans, G. C., "The humanities and the social sciences", American Behavioral Scientist, 4(8), pp.3~6 (1961)
- Huo, B., "The impact of information sharing on supply chain learning and flexibility performance", International Journal of Production Research, 59(5), pp.1411~1434 (2021)
- Huo, B., "The impact of justice on information sharing and innovation performance : A social exchange theory perspective", Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 38(11), pp.2519~2532 (2023)
- Ibragimova, B., "Understanding the antecedents of knowledge sharing : An organizational justice perspective", Informing Science, 15, pp.183~205 (2012)
- Imamoglu, S. Z., "The effect of organizational justice and organizational commitment on knowledge sharing and firm performance", Procedia Computer Science, 158, pp.899~906 (2019)
- Keebler, J. S., "Logistics performance measurement in the supply chain : Abenchmark", Benchmarking : An International Journal, 16(6), pp.785~798 (2009)
- Lambert, D. M., "Issues in supply chain management", Industrial Marketing Management, 29(1), pp.65~83 (2000)
- Lee, C., "The impact of interactional justice and supply-chain collaboration on sustainable SCM performance:The case of multinational pharmaceutical firms", The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(2), pp.237~247 (2020)
- Lee, C., "Interactional justice, informational quality, and sustainable supply chain management : A comparison of domestic and multinational pharmaceutical companies", Sustainability, 13(2), pp.998~ (2021)
- Liu, Y., "How does justice matter in achieving buyer–supplier relationship performance", Journal of Operations Management, 30(5), pp.355~367 (2012)
- Lotfi, Z., "Information sharing in supply chain management", Procedia Technology, 11, pp.298~304 (2013)
- Mohr, J., "Characteristics of partnership success : Partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques", Strategic Management Journal, 15(2), pp.135~152 (1994)
- Mohr, J. J., "Collaborative communication in interfirm relationships : Moderating effects of integration and control", Journal of Marketing, 60(3), pp.103~115 (1996)
- Morgan, R. M., "The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing", Journal of Marketing, 58(3), pp.20~38 (1994)
- Narasimhan, R., "An investigation of justice in supply chain relationships and their performance impact", Journal of Operations Management, 31(5), pp.236~247 (2013)
- Nazifa, T. H., "Exploring the role of information sharing in supply chain management : A case study", Journal of System and Management Sciences, 8(4), pp.13~37 (2018)
- Parker, R. J., "Advances in Management Accounting", pp.93~112 (2014), Emerald Group Publishing Limited
- Prajogo, D., "Supply chain integration and performance : The effects of long-term relationships, information technology and sharing, and logistics integration", International Journal of Production Economics, 135(1), pp.514~522 (2012)
- Premus, R., "Information sharing in global supply chain alliances", Journal of Asia-Pacific Business, 9(2), pp.174~192 (2008)
- Purnama, Y. H., "The relationship of organizational justice on job satisfaction and job performance in banking company", International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(3), pp.4012~4015 (2020)
- Stank, T. P., "Logistics service performance : Estimating its influence on market share", Journal of Business Logistics, 24(1), pp.27~55 (2003)
- Tajima, E., "Effectiveness of a multi-agent cooperation game ina multi-stage supply chain: Beer game experiment", Journal of Japan Industrial Management Association, 73(4E), pp.234~250 (2023)
- Theodorakopoulos, N., "Procedural justice in procurement management and inclusive interorganizational relations : An institutional perspective", British Journal of Management, 26(2), pp.237~254 (2015)
- Thibaut, J., "Procedural justice: A psychological analysis" (1975), Lawrence Erlbaum
- Tyler, T. R., "Handbook of Justice Research in Law", pp.65~92 (2001)
- Wang, Q., "Justice served : Mitigating damaged trust stemming from supply chain disruptions", Journal of Operations Management, 32(6), pp.374~386 (2014)
- Wei, S., "The effects of justice and top management beliefs and participation : An exploratory study in the context of digital supply chain management", Journal of Business Ethics, 166(1), pp.51~71 (2020)
- To our shareholders. General Electric 1990 Annual Report, "Welch, J. F.", 1~4 (1990)
- Wen, S., "Exploring the global research trends of supply chain management of construction projects based on a bibliometric analysis : Current status and future prospects", Buildings, 13(2), pp.273~ (2023)