Clinical expression of programmed maxillary buccal expansion and buccolingual crown inclination with Invisalign EX30 and SmartTrack aligners and the effect of 1-week vs. 2-week aligner change regimes: A retrospective cohort study
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: This retrospective cohort study aimed to assess and compare the accuracy of 3 different Invisalign® treatment regimens in terms of variations of aligner change frequency and type of aligner material in achieving maxillary dental buccal expansion. Methods: Altogether, 120 adult patients whose treatment involved maxillary dental expansion with Invisalign® were included. The patients were divided into 3 groups, with each group comprising 40 patients as follows: SmartTrack® 1-week changes (ST1), SmartTrack® 2-week changes (ST2), and EX30® 2-week changes (EX2). The groups were assessed by comparing actual changes achieved with those prescribed by ClinCheck®. The rates of clinically significant inaccuracies (CSI) observed for buccal expansion (≥ 0.5 mm) and buccolingual inclination (≥ 2°) during expansion were then determined. Results: In terms of expansion, the ST1 group demonstrated the highest CSI rate at all tooth levels, whereas the ST2 group had the lowest rate of CSI and the lowest mean inaccuracy for each tooth level. In terms of buccolingual inclination, the ST1 group had the highest CSI rate across all tooth levels, whereas the EX2 group had the lowest CSI rate at all tooth levels except for the canine level where the ST2 group had the lowest CSI rate. A tendency toward overexpression of buccal crown inclination, and underexpression of buccal expansion was observed at all tooth levels. Conclusions: Two-week aligner change regimens offer improved accuracy compared with 1-week aligner changes. SmartTrack® 2-week changes were the most accurate for buccal expansion, whereas EX30® 2-week changes were the most accurate for buccolingual inclination.
Abstract
Objective: This retrospective cohort study aimed to assess and compare the accuracy of 3 different Invisalign® treatment regimens in terms of variations of aligner change frequency and type of aligner material in achieving maxillary dental buccal expansion. Methods: Altogether, 120 adult patients whose treatment involved maxillary dental expansion with Invisalign® were included. The patients were divided into 3 groups, with each group comprising 40 patients as follows: SmartTrack® 1-week changes (ST1), SmartTrack® 2-week changes (ST2), and EX30® 2-week changes (EX2). The groups were assessed by comparing actual changes achieved with those prescribed by ClinCheck®. The rates of clinically significant inaccuracies (CSI) observed for buccal expansion (≥ 0.5 mm) and buccolingual inclination (≥ 2°) during expansion were then determined. Results: In terms of expansion, the ST1 group demonstrated the highest CSI rate at all tooth levels, whereas the ST2 group had the lowest rate of CSI and the lowest mean inaccuracy for each tooth level. In terms of buccolingual inclination, the ST1 group had the highest CSI rate across all tooth levels, whereas the EX2 group had the lowest CSI rate at all tooth levels except for the canine level where the ST2 group had the lowest CSI rate. A tendency toward overexpression of buccal crown inclination, and underexpression of buccal expansion was observed at all tooth levels. Conclusions: Two-week aligner change regimens offer improved accuracy compared with 1-week aligner changes. SmartTrack® 2-week changes were the most accurate for buccal expansion, whereas EX30® 2-week changes were the most accurate for buccolingual inclination.
참고문헌 (24)
- Martin AJ, "The impact of buccal corridors on smile attractiveness", Eur J Orthod, 29, pp.530~537 (2007)[DOI]
- Parekh S, "The acceptability of variations in smile arc and buccal corridor space", Orthod Craniofac Res, 10, pp.15~21 (2007)[DOI]
- Thilander B, "The effect of early interceptive treatment in children with posterior cross-bite", Eur J Orthod, 6, pp.25~34 (1984)[DOI]
- Papageorgiou SN, "Torque differences according to tooth morphology and bracket placement : a finite element study", Eur J Orthod, 39, pp.411~418 (2017)[DOI]
- Andrews LF, "The six keys to normal occlusion", Am J Orthod, 62, pp.296~309 (1972)[DOI]
- Zhou N, "Efficiency of upper arch expansion with the Invisalign system", Angle Orthod, 90, pp.23~30 (2020)[DOI]
- Papadimitriou A, "Clinical effectiveness of Invisalign® orthodontic treatment : a systematic review", Prog Orthod, 19, pp.37~ (2018)[DOI]
- "Align technology receives U.S. patents for Smarttrack® Invisalign® aligner material" (2017)[URL]
- Condo' R, "Mechanical properties of"two generations"of teeth aligners : change analysis during oral permanence", Dent Mater J, 37, pp.835~842 (2018)[DOI]
- Bollen AM, "Activation time and material stiffness of sequential removable orthodontic appliances. Part 1 : ability to complete treatment", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 124, pp.496~501 (2003)[DOI]
- Clements KM, "Activation time and material stiffness of sequential removable orthodontic appliances. Part 2 : dental improvements", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 124, pp.502~508 (2003)[DOI]
- Baldwin DK, "Activation time and material stiffness of sequential removable orthodontic appliances. Part 3 : premolar extraction patients", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 133, pp.837~845 (2008)[DOI]
- Al-Nadawi M, "Effect of clear aligner wear protocol on the efficacy of tooth movement", Angle Orthod, 91, pp.157~163 (2021)[DOI]
- Stephens C, "Clinical expression of programmed mandibular canine rotation using various attachment protocols and 1-vs 2-week wear protocols with Invisalign SmartTrack aligners : a retrospective cohort study", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 162, pp.e103~e115 (2022)[DOI]
- Blundell HL, "Predictability of overbite control with the Invisalign appliance", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 160, pp.725~731 (2021)[DOI]
- Weir T, "Quantitative assessment of interproximal tooth reduction performed as part of Invisalign® treatment in 10 orthodontic practices", Aust Orthod J, 37, pp.176~186 (2021)[DOI]
- Weir T, "Prevalence of interproximal tooth reduction prescribed as part of initial Invisalign® treatment in 10 orthodontic practices", Aust Orthod J, 38, pp.96~101 (2022)
- Solano-Mendoza B, "How effective is the Invisalign® system in expansion movement with Ex30' aligners?", Clin Oral Investig, 21, pp.1475~1484 (2017)[DOI]
- Grünheid T, "How accurate is Invisalign in nonextraction cases? Are predicted tooth positions achieved?", Angle Orthod, 87, pp.809~815 (2017)[DOI]
- Houle JP, "The predictability of transverse changes with Invisalign", Angle Orthod, 87, pp.19~24 (2017)[DOI]
- Lione R, "Maxillary arch development with Invisalign system", Angle Orthod, 91, pp.433~440 (2021)[DOI]
- aligner material, "J Orofac Orthop", 2016, 432~438, 10.1007[DOI]
- Robertson L, "Effectiveness of clear aligner therapy for orthodontic treatment : a systematic review", Orthod Craniofac Res, 23, pp.133~142 (2020)[DOI]
- Galan-Lopez L, "A systematic review of the accuracy and efficiency of dental movements with Invisalign®", Korean J Orthod, 49, pp.140~149 (2019)[DOI]