Characterization of facial asymmetry phenotypes in adult patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion using three-dimensional computed tomography and cluster analysis
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: To classify facial asymmetry (FA) phenotypes in adult patients with skeletal Class III (C-III) malocclusion. Methods: A total of 120 C-III patients who underwent orthognathic surgery (OGS) and whose three-dimensional computed tomography images were taken one month prior to OGS were evaluated. Thirty hard tissue landmarks were identified. After measurement of 22 variables, including cant (°, mm), shift (mm), and yaw (°) of the maxilla, maxillary dentition (Max-dent), mandibular dentition, mandible, and mandibular border (Man-border) and differences in the frontal ramus angle (FRA, °) and ramus height (RH, mm), K-means cluster analysis was conducted using three variables (cant in the Max-dent [mm] and shift [mm] and yaw [°] in the Man-border). Statistical analyses were conducted to characterize the differences in the FA variables among the clusters. Results: The FA phenotypes were classified into five types: 1) non-asymmetry type (35.8%); 2) maxillary-cant type (14.2%; severe cant of the Max-dent, mild shift of the Man-border); 3) mandibular-shift and yaw type (16.7%; moderate shift and yaw of the Man-border, mild RH-difference); 4) complex type (9.2%; severe cant of the Max-dent, moderate cant, severe shift, and severe yaw of the Man-border, moderate differences in FRA and RH); and 5) maxillary reverse-cant type (24.2%; reverse-cant of the Max-dent). Strategic decompensation by pre-surgical orthodontic treatment and considerations for OGS planning were proposed according to the FA phenotypes. Conclusions: This FA phenotype classification may be an effective tool for differential diagnosis and surgical planning for Class III patients with FA.
Abstract
Objective: To classify facial asymmetry (FA) phenotypes in adult patients with skeletal Class III (C-III) malocclusion. Methods: A total of 120 C-III patients who underwent orthognathic surgery (OGS) and whose three-dimensional computed tomography images were taken one month prior to OGS were evaluated. Thirty hard tissue landmarks were identified. After measurement of 22 variables, including cant (°, mm), shift (mm), and yaw (°) of the maxilla, maxillary dentition (Max-dent), mandibular dentition, mandible, and mandibular border (Man-border) and differences in the frontal ramus angle (FRA, °) and ramus height (RH, mm), K-means cluster analysis was conducted using three variables (cant in the Max-dent [mm] and shift [mm] and yaw [°] in the Man-border). Statistical analyses were conducted to characterize the differences in the FA variables among the clusters. Results: The FA phenotypes were classified into five types: 1) non-asymmetry type (35.8%); 2) maxillary-cant type (14.2%; severe cant of the Max-dent, mild shift of the Man-border); 3) mandibular-shift and yaw type (16.7%; moderate shift and yaw of the Man-border, mild RH-difference); 4) complex type (9.2%; severe cant of the Max-dent, moderate cant, severe shift, and severe yaw of the Man-border, moderate differences in FRA and RH); and 5) maxillary reverse-cant type (24.2%; reverse-cant of the Max-dent). Strategic decompensation by pre-surgical orthodontic treatment and considerations for OGS planning were proposed according to the FA phenotypes. Conclusions: This FA phenotype classification may be an effective tool for differential diagnosis and surgical planning for Class III patients with FA.
참고문헌 (29)
- Cheong YW, "Facial asymmetry: etiology, evaluation, and management", Chang Gung Med J, 34, pp.341~351 (2011)
- Yongxu Piao, "Five-year investigation of a large orthodontic patient population at a dental hospital in South Korea", 대한치과교정학회지, 46(3), pp.137~145 (2016), 대한치과교정학회
- Bergersen EO, "Enlargement and distortion in cephalometric radiography : compensation tables for linear measurements", Angle Orthod, 50, pp.230~244 (1980)
- Katsumata A, "3D-CT evaluation of facial asymmetry", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 99, pp.212~220 (2005)
- Hwang HS, "Maxillofacial 3-dimensional image analysis for the diagnosis of facial asymmetry", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 130, pp.779~785 (2006)
- Maeda M, "3D-CT evaluation of facial asymmetry in patients with maxillofacial deformities", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 102, pp.382~390 (2006)
- Baek SH, "Skeletodental factors affecting chin point deviation in female patients with class III malocclusion and facial asymmetry : a three-dimensional analysis using computed tomography", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 104, pp.628~639 (2007)
- Akhil G, "Three-dimensional assessment of facial asymmetry:a systematic review", J Pharm Bioallied Sci, 7(Suppl 2), pp.S433~S437 (2015)
- Hwang HS, "Classification of facial asymmetry by cluster analysis", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 132, pp.279~ (2007)
- Baek C, "Morphologic evaluation and classification of facial asymmetry using 3-dimensional computed tomography", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 70, pp.1161~1169 (2012)
- Kim JY, "A simple classification of facial asymmetry by TML system", J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 42, pp.313~320 (2014)
- López DF, "Are there mandibular morphological differences in the various facial asymmetry etiologies? A tomographic three-dimensional reconstruction study", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 77, pp.2324~2338 (2019)
- Tyan S, "Three-dimensional analysis of molar compensation in patients with facial asymmetry and mandibular prognathism", Angle Orthod, 86, pp.421~430 (2016)
- 김경아, "Targeted presurgical decompensation in patients with yaw-dependent facial asymmetry", 대한치과교정학회지, 47(3), pp.195~206 (2017), 대한치과교정학회
- Chen YJ, "Characterization of facial asymmetry in skeletal Class III malocclusion and its implications for treatment", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 48, pp.1533~1541 (2019)
- Kwon SM, "Diagnosis and surgical outcomes of facial asymmetry according to the occlusal cant and menton deviation", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 77, pp.1261~1275 (2019)
- Hong Mihee, "Three-dimensional surgical accuracy between virtually planned and actual surgical movements of the maxilla in two-jaw orthognathic surgery", 대한치과교정학회지, 50(5), pp.293~303 (2020), 대한치과교정학회[DOI]
- Hwang HS, "An interview with Hyeon-Shik Hwang", Dental Press J Orthod, 21, pp.24~33 (2016)
- Joondeph DR, "Mysteries of asymmetries", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 117, pp.577~579 (2000)
- Tay DK, "Physiognomy in the classification of individuals with a lateral preference in mastication", J Orofac Pain, 8, pp.61~72 (1994)
- Jeon YJ, "Correction of a canted occlusal plane with miniscrews in a patient with facial asymmetry", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 130, pp.244~252 (2006)
- Takano-Yamamoto T, "Titanium screw anchorage for correction of canted occlusal plane in patients with facial asymmetry", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 132, pp.237~242 (2007)
- Fleming PS, "The timing of significant arch dimensional changes with fixed orthodontic appliances : data from a multicenter randomised controlled trial", J Dent, 42, pp.1~6 (2014)
- Sugawara J, "Distal movement of mandibular molars in adult patients with the skeletal anchorage system", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 125, pp.130~138 (2004)
- Jonghan Yu, "Treatment effects of mandibular total arch distalization using a ramal plate", 대한치과교정학회지, 46(4), pp.212~219 (2016), 대한치과교정학회
- On SW, "Quantitative evaluation of the postoperative changes in nasal septal deviation by diverse movement of the maxilla after Le Fort I osteotomy", J Craniofac Surg, 31, pp.1251~1215 (2020)
- Baek SH, "Is there any difference in the condylar position and angulation after asymmetric mandibular setback?", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 101, pp.155~163 (2006)
- Yang HJ, "Change in condylar position in posterior bending osteotomy minimizing condylar torque in BSSRO for facial asymmetry", J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 42, pp.325~332 (2014)
- Ho CT, "Three-dimensional surgical simulation improves the planning for correction of facial prognathism and asymmetry : a qualitative and quantitative study", Sci Rep, 7, pp.40423~ (2017)