Impacts of Intellectual Property Rights on Trade Flows in ASEAN Countries
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study provides new evidence regarding the linkage between the enforcement of IPR and trade flows in ASEAN countries. Based on the analysis of a gravity model and using the categorized panel data, the study finds robust empirical results. First, reinforced IPR protection in the importing countries (non-ASEAN countries) has a positive impact on ASEAN’s exports, indicating the prevalence of the market expansion effect. Stronger effects are found in the high-tech sectors such as chemicals, machinery and transport equipment. Second, increased IPR protection in the importing countries (ASEAN) has a negative effect on ASEAN’s imports, exhibiting the dominance of the market power effect. Stronger effects are found in the manufactured goods, beverage and tobacco industries. Third, since the coefficient on the IPR index is positive and statistically insignificant, we conclude that stronger protection of IPRs in both the ROW and ASEAN leads to an ambiguous increase in bilateral trade between ASEAN and the ROW. This is because of the fact that the increase in ASEAN’s exports due to stronger IPR protection in the ROW is partly cancelled out by the decrease in ASEAN’s imports as the result of stronger IPR protection in ASEAN.
Abstract
This study provides new evidence regarding the linkage between the enforcement of IPR and trade flows in ASEAN countries. Based on the analysis of a gravity model and using the categorized panel data, the study finds robust empirical results. First, reinforced IPR protection in the importing countries (non-ASEAN countries) has a positive impact on ASEAN’s exports, indicating the prevalence of the market expansion effect. Stronger effects are found in the high-tech sectors such as chemicals, machinery and transport equipment. Second, increased IPR protection in the importing countries (ASEAN) has a negative effect on ASEAN’s imports, exhibiting the dominance of the market power effect. Stronger effects are found in the manufactured goods, beverage and tobacco industries. Third, since the coefficient on the IPR index is positive and statistically insignificant, we conclude that stronger protection of IPRs in both the ROW and ASEAN leads to an ambiguous increase in bilateral trade between ASEAN and the ROW. This is because of the fact that the increase in ASEAN’s exports due to stronger IPR protection in the ROW is partly cancelled out by the decrease in ASEAN’s imports as the result of stronger IPR protection in ASEAN.
참고문헌 (30)
- "Bilateral Intra-industry Trade Flows and Intellectual Property Rights Protection: First Empirical Evidence", 12(13), pp.823~828 (2005)
- "“A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation", pp.106~116 (1979)
- "“Regional Economic Integration and the Volume of Intra-Regional Trade A Comparison of Developed and Developing Country Experience", pp.589~603 (1983)
- "Do Patent Rights Regimes Matter?", 12(3), pp.359~373 (2004)
- "Trade Creation and Trade Diversion in the EEC, the LAFTA and the CMEA: 1960-1994", 31, pp.207~216 (1999)
- "The Transition of Postwar Asia-Pacific Trade Relations", 10, pp.571~589 (2000)
- "“The Effect of Intellectual Property Rights on International Trade and Investment", ferranti, pp.300~331 (1993)
- "How Stronger Protection of Intellectual Property Rights Affects International Trade Flows" (2005), Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development[DOI]
- "Does a Currency Union Affect Trade? The Time-Series Evidence", 46(6), pp.1125~1151 (2002)
- "The Political Economy of the World Trading System: The WTO and Beyond" (2001), New York: Oxford University Press
- "The Effects of the Interaction of the Foreign Intellectual Property Rights and Imitation Ability on the Export Patterns of IT Industrial Sectors in Korea", 8(1), pp.231~258 (2007)
- "The Effects of Foreign Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) on the Export Volume of Korea", 31(4), pp.5~31 (2006)
- "Intellectual property protection and U.S. foreign direct investment", 78(2), pp.181~186 (1996)
- "An Econometric Study of International Trade Flows" (1966), Linneman North-Holland.
- "The International Regulation of Intellectual Property", 134(2), pp.186~208 (1998)
- "Intellectual Property Rights in the Global Economy" (2000), Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics
- "How Trade-related Are Intellectual Property Rights?", 39, pp.227~248 (1995)
- "Patents and International Trade: An Empirical Study" (1997), Quiet Pioneering, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
- "A Reformulation and an Application to Discriminatory Trade Arrangements", ” applied eco(mics 26), pp.107~120 (1994)
- "The Effects of Patent Rights on International Trade: Evidence of Korea", 10(1), pp.19~42 (2005)
- "Determinants of Patent Rights: A Cross-national Study", 26, pp.283~301 (1997)
- "The Economic Justification for the Grant of Intellectual Property Rights: Patterns of Convergence and Conflict" (1997), Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers
- "The Impact of Patent Rights on International Trade: Evidence from Canada", 35(2), pp.307~330 (2002)
- "“Benefits and Costs of Intellectual Property Protection in Developing Countries ” Journal of World Trade 24", pp.75~102 (1990)
- "“Patent Protection Through Discriminatory Exclusion of Imports ” Review of Industrial Organization 6", pp.231~246 (1991)
- "The impact of Intellectual Property Rights on Foreign Direct Investment", 31(1), pp.50~59 (1996)
- "Are Weak Patent Rights a Barrier to U.S. Exports?", 48, pp.151~177 (1999)
- "Patent Rights and Trade: Analysis of Biological Products, Medicinals and Botanicals, and Pharmaceuticals", 84(2), pp.495~512 (2002)
- "” Canadian Journal of Economics 26", pp.625~638 (1993)
- "Foreign Patent Right and High-Tech Export: Evidence from Taiwan", 37(13), pp.1543~1555 (2005)