본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

신중국 최초의 극영화 <다리(橋)>(1949)의 제작 및 상영에 관한 연구

A Study on Production and Screening of New China’s First Feature Film The Bridge (1949)

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

In May 1949, the last stage of the Chinese Civil War, a film called The Bridge was released to the public in a liberation zone, an area occupied by the Chinese Communist Party. The existing narrative of film history has not deviated from monotonous content that The Bridge is New China’s first feature film or first film featuring the working class as a main character. In addition, development of empirical research focusing on this film is insignificant. This paper deals with historical background of an entrance of the film The Bridge and a fact about its production and screening that have not yet been identified by using the abundant literature data that have been secured so far. This paper focuses on how an obstacle of lack of filming facilities and professional manpower was overcome during its production process and how it was performed in terms of box-office success while being screened simultaneously with Hollywood movies that were familiar to citizens during its screening stage. In addition, this paper specifically examines the various critical discourses surrounding the film, that is, what kind of repercussions its release caused, from a receptive aspect. At that time, Chinese literature was before it was placed under the absolute control of the Communist Party government. Therefore, it is true that criticism of a film about workers, farmers, and soldiers was allowed to some extent. However, creation and criticism of literature in the liberation zone could never be free from they were political ideology imposed by the Chinese Communist Party. Since socialist realism, which suppressed autonomy and originality, emerged as a rule, box-office success or artistic value was no longer considered in determining the content and form of a film. Political nature of the films was a top priority. Through The Bridge, which appeared at a time when literature about workers, farmers, and soldiers which only allowed the public’s unilateral acceptance, especially intellects’ helpless obedience, became mainstream, its distinct presence as an educational tool which propagated and instigated the party’s dominant ideology can be confirmed.

Abstract

In May 1949, the last stage of the Chinese Civil War, a film called The Bridge was released to the public in a liberation zone, an area occupied by the Chinese Communist Party. The existing narrative of film history has not deviated from monotonous content that The Bridge is New China’s first feature film or first film featuring the working class as a main character. In addition, development of empirical research focusing on this film is insignificant. This paper deals with historical background of an entrance of the film The Bridge and a fact about its production and screening that have not yet been identified by using the abundant literature data that have been secured so far. This paper focuses on how an obstacle of lack of filming facilities and professional manpower was overcome during its production process and how it was performed in terms of box-office success while being screened simultaneously with Hollywood movies that were familiar to citizens during its screening stage. In addition, this paper specifically examines the various critical discourses surrounding the film, that is, what kind of repercussions its release caused, from a receptive aspect. At that time, Chinese literature was before it was placed under the absolute control of the Communist Party government. Therefore, it is true that criticism of a film about workers, farmers, and soldiers was allowed to some extent. However, creation and criticism of literature in the liberation zone could never be free from they were political ideology imposed by the Chinese Communist Party. Since socialist realism, which suppressed autonomy and originality, emerged as a rule, box-office success or artistic value was no longer considered in determining the content and form of a film. Political nature of the films was a top priority. Through The Bridge, which appeared at a time when literature about workers, farmers, and soldiers which only allowed the public’s unilateral acceptance, especially intellects’ helpless obedience, became mainstream, its distinct presence as an educational tool which propagated and instigated the party’s dominant ideology can be confirmed.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. 김시준, "중국당대문학사조사연구 1949-1993" (2001), 서울대학교출판부
  2. 사진의 작은 역사 외, "기술복제시대의 예술작품", pp.2022, 발터 벤야민
  3. 陳播, "中國電影編年紀事(製片卷)" (2006), 中央文獻出版社
  4. 陳播, "中國電影編年紀事(發行上映卷⋅上)" (2008), 中央文獻出版社
  5. 陳思和, "中國文學中的世界性因素" (2011), 復旦大學出版社
  6. 程季華, "中國電影發展史第二卷" (2012), 中國電影出版社
  7. 丁玲, "丁玲全集第七卷" (2001), 河北人民出版社
  8. 侯君, "憶王濱" (2003), 中國電影出版社
  9. 胡昶, "長春市誌⋅電影誌" (1992), 東北師範大學出版社
  10. 胡昶, "東影的日本人" (2005), 長春市政協文史資料委員會
  11. 胡風, "胡風全集第三卷" (1999), 湖北人民出版社
  12. 李道新, "王濱年譜", 當代電影, (1) (2012)
  13. 柳迪善, "新中國譯製片 : 1949-1966" (2015), 中國電影出版社
  14. 毛澤東, "毛澤東選集第三卷" (1991), 人民出版社
  15. 毛澤東, "毛澤東選集第四卷" (1991), 人民出版社
  16. 孟犁野, "新中國電影藝術史稿(1949-1959)" (2003), 中國電影出版社
  17. 錢理群, "1948 : 天地玄黃" (2021), 香港城市大學出版社
  18. 文化部文學藝術研究院, "周恩來論文藝" (1979), 人民文學出版社
  19. 吳躍農, "1949年上海文化接管紀事", 文史春秋, (9) (2022)
  20. 吳築淸, "中國電影的豐碑-延安電影團故事" (2008), 中國人民大學出版社
  21. 于敏, "于敏文集第一卷電影劇本" (2014), 中國電影出版社
  22. 于敏, "于敏自傳" (2005), 中國電影出版社
  23. 于洋, "憶王濱及《橋》的拍攝", 電影藝術, (1) (2002)
  24. 周立波, "周立波研究資料" (1983), 湖南人民出版社
  25. 周揚, "周揚文集第一卷" (1984), 人民文學出版社
  26. 岸富美子, "満映とわたし" (2015), 文藝春秋

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)