본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

허구적 예증법으로 살펴본 『莊子』寓言

Zhuangzi’s Fables From the Fictional Exemplification

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Fables occupy a large proportion in Zhuangzi and their role is also very important. Fables have been regarded as fantasy and fictional stories. But fables are stories with convincing power that appear as examples to understand Zhuangzi’s thoughts. Looking at the fables in Zhuangzi through Exemplifications, it can be explained differently from the previous understanding. For example, the fable ‘Zhao San Mu Si(朝三暮四)’ is not a metaphor for people who only know the differences in front of them, but rather appears to illustrate the concept of ‘Liang Xing(兩行)’. In addition, the fable ‘Paoding Jie Niu(庖丁解牛)’ is not intended to metaphorically describe the superb craftsmanship of ‘Paoding(庖丁)’, but rather to narrate the story of ‘Yangsheng(養生)’. Moreover, the fable ‘Chaotic(渾沌)’ can also be seen as messages conveyed to monarchs and strategists, rather than warnings of human behavior. In this way, the most famous representative fables in the fables of Zhuangzi, such as ‘Zhao San Mu Si(朝三暮四)’, ‘Paoding Jie Niu(庖丁解牛)’, and ‘Chaotic(渾沌)’, are understood so differently. However, these fables have been adapted to omit a part of the original content, or did not take into account the meaning of the title. In the future, it is necessary to supplement research on the reasons and timing of such changes in fables.

Abstract

Fables occupy a large proportion in Zhuangzi and their role is also very important. Fables have been regarded as fantasy and fictional stories. But fables are stories with convincing power that appear as examples to understand Zhuangzi’s thoughts. Looking at the fables in Zhuangzi through Exemplifications, it can be explained differently from the previous understanding. For example, the fable ‘Zhao San Mu Si(朝三暮四)’ is not a metaphor for people who only know the differences in front of them, but rather appears to illustrate the concept of ‘Liang Xing(兩行)’. In addition, the fable ‘Paoding Jie Niu(庖丁解牛)’ is not intended to metaphorically describe the superb craftsmanship of ‘Paoding(庖丁)’, but rather to narrate the story of ‘Yangsheng(養生)’. Moreover, the fable ‘Chaotic(渾沌)’ can also be seen as messages conveyed to monarchs and strategists, rather than warnings of human behavior. In this way, the most famous representative fables in the fables of Zhuangzi, such as ‘Zhao San Mu Si(朝三暮四)’, ‘Paoding Jie Niu(庖丁解牛)’, and ‘Chaotic(渾沌)’, are understood so differently. However, these fables have been adapted to omit a part of the original content, or did not take into account the meaning of the title. In the future, it is necessary to supplement research on the reasons and timing of such changes in fables.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. 고지영, "장자 글쓰기와 그 활용 연구", 박사, pp.2021
  2. 고지영, "장자의 「응제왕(應帝王)」 다시 읽기: 불응(不應)의 수사 분석을 겸하여", 수사학, (45), pp.73~98 (2022), 한국수사학회
  3. 고지영, "莊子의 글쓰기를 통한 논증 교육 - <養生主>와 생략 삼단 논법을 중심으로 -", 중국인문과학, (74), pp.127~146 (2020), 중국인문학회[DOI]
  4. "표준국어대사전", 국립국어원[URL]
  5. 김창환, "장자⋅내편" (2010), 을유문화사
  6. 김학목, "「장자」 곽상주 해제" (2020), 학고방
  7. "두피디아", 두산백과[URL]
  8. 박성창, "수사학" (2000), 문학과지성사
  9. 박세당, "박세당의 장자, 남화경주해산보 내편" (2012), 예문서원
  10. 박소정, "『장자』와 신화적 글쓰기 ―「제물론」과 「우언」을 중심으로―", 철학연구, 61, pp.5~24 (2003), 철학연구회
  11. 福永光司, "후쿠나가 미츠지의 장자 내편" (2020), 문진
  12. 아리스토텔레스, "아리스토텔레스 수사학" (2020), 현대지성
  13. 안동림, "莊子" (1993), 현암사
  14. 안병주, "역주 장자1" (2008), 전통문화연구회
  15. 오강남, "장자" (2003), 현암사
  16. 이택용, "『장자』 내편 「응제왕」이 갖는 몇 가지 문제에 대한 고찰", 동양고전연구, (64), pp.345~382 (2016), 동양고전학회
  17. 장담, "장담의 열자주" (2022), 한길사
  18. 장자, "莊子-내편" (2022), 홍익
  19. 장자, "장자Ⅰ" (2013), 길
  20. 전호근, "장자강의" (2015), 동녘
  21. 첸푸칭, "세계의 우언과 알레고리" (2010), 지식산업사
  22. 한영걸, "『莊子』 寓言의 神話 受容과 中國小說에 미친 영향", 中國散文硏究集刊, 10, pp.13~32 (2020), 한국중국산문학회[DOI]
  23. 郭慶藩, "莊子集釋" (2008), 中華書局
  24. 司馬遷, "史記" (1982), 中華書局
  25. 莊周, "莊子全譯" (1994), 貴州人民出版社

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)