중국의 빅테크에 대한 국가전략의 변화: 고강도 규제에서 체계적 규제로
The Changes in China's State Strategy for Big Tech:From High-intensity Regulations to Systemic Regulations
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aims to analyze the phenomenon that there are recently signs of deregulation on Big Tech in 2022. This paper accepts the above hypothetical argument. In other words, it is difficult to see the current deregulation of China as the end of regulation on Big Tech, and it should be said that it has changed to “systemic regulation.” This paper notes that there are various regulatory-related institutions. Among them, the Cyberspace Administration of China(CAC) and the State Administration for Market Regulation(SAMR) of the China Communist Party are regarded as regulatory agencies, and the Cyberspace Administration of China is described in detail as regulatory-oriented. It is also emphasized that there are pro-growth groups. The Financial Stability and Development Committee(FSDC) of the State Council is classified as a representative pro-growth group and detailed. The Chinese Academy of Social Sciences is also theoretically supporting pro-growth groups by publishing a research report that Big Tech contributes to common wealth. Civilian theoretical support for the pro-growth faction also exist. For example, Professor Huang Yi-ping, who served as a member of the People's Bank of China, criticizes “strong regulation,” pointing out the problems of regulation so far and pointed out the need for unified governance. The side effects of high-intensity regulations are expected to mark a decisive turning point in the interministerial meeting mechanism focused on the country’s digital economy system formed by the State Council. The interministerial meeting is expected to seek the role of unified governance while coordinating differences between various regulatory agencies of the party and the government.
Abstract
This paper aims to analyze the phenomenon that there are recently signs of deregulation on Big Tech in 2022. This paper accepts the above hypothetical argument. In other words, it is difficult to see the current deregulation of China as the end of regulation on Big Tech, and it should be said that it has changed to “systemic regulation.” This paper notes that there are various regulatory-related institutions. Among them, the Cyberspace Administration of China(CAC) and the State Administration for Market Regulation(SAMR) of the China Communist Party are regarded as regulatory agencies, and the Cyberspace Administration of China is described in detail as regulatory-oriented. It is also emphasized that there are pro-growth groups. The Financial Stability and Development Committee(FSDC) of the State Council is classified as a representative pro-growth group and detailed. The Chinese Academy of Social Sciences is also theoretically supporting pro-growth groups by publishing a research report that Big Tech contributes to common wealth. Civilian theoretical support for the pro-growth faction also exist. For example, Professor Huang Yi-ping, who served as a member of the People's Bank of China, criticizes “strong regulation,” pointing out the problems of regulation so far and pointed out the need for unified governance. The side effects of high-intensity regulations are expected to mark a decisive turning point in the interministerial meeting mechanism focused on the country’s digital economy system formed by the State Council. The interministerial meeting is expected to seek the role of unified governance while coordinating differences between various regulatory agencies of the party and the government.
참고문헌 (28)
- 문정현, "中 데이터 세금 도입 부상…인터넷 대기업 통제 박차", 연합인포맥스, ~ (2021)
- 안승섭, "중국 인터넷 통제 책임자에 시진핑 측근 임명", 연합뉴스, ~ (2018)
- 이중희, "중국의 거대 플랫폼에 대한 반독점과 데이터 독점 규제: 알리바바 사례를 중심으로", 아시아연구, 24(4), pp.87~102 (2021), 한국아시아학회[DOI]
- 이중희, "중국의 디지털 위안화 도입과정 연구: 국가 통제력의 강화와 거대 플랫폼", 공공사회연구, 11(3), pp.125~150 (2021), 한국공공사회학회[DOI]
- 이중희, "중국의 플랫폼 고강도 규제기간에서 이해당사자와 국가전략 : 메이퇀 사례를 중심으로", 아시아연구, 25(2), pp.149~164 (2022), 한국아시아학회[DOI]
- Coie, Perkins, "Enforcement Trends From China’s Cyberspace Regulator in 2022", JD Supra, ~ (2022)
- Caughey, AJ, "How the CAC became Chinese Tech’s Biggest Nightmare: The Cyberspace Administration of China’s Core Functions Have Expanded from Content Control to Data Security and Privacy, and it now Affects the Entire Digital Economy", PROTOCOL, ~ (2022)
- Feng, Coco, "Chinese Delivery Giant Meituan Axes Jobs at Core Departments as Lay-offs in Tech Sector Deepen", SCMP, ~ (2022)
- Huang Yiping, "Strong Regulations’ of China’s Platform Economy: a Preliminary Assessment", China Economic Journal, 15(2) (2022)
- Qu, Tracy, "Meituan, China’s Biggest On-demand Delivery Provider, Posts Wider Quarterly Loss amid Regulatory Pressure", SCMP, ~ (2022)
- SCMP, "China's regulatory storm may soon subside for Big Tech firms after Xi Jinping's right-hand man calls for order and transparency", SCMP, ~ (2022)
- Shen, Xinmei, "China Enforces Regular Government Meetings to Coordinate Big Tech Policies as Crackdown Eases", SCMP(South China Morning Post), ~ (2022)
- White, Edward, "China’s Chaotic Regulatory Crackdown Reflects Splits among Policymakers", The Financial Times, ~ (2022)
- Xie, Stella Yifan, "Xi Jinping’s ‘Common Prosperity’ Was Everywhere, but China Backed Off", The Wall Street Journal, ~ (2022)
- "国办：同意建立数字经济发展部际联席会议制度" (2022)[URL]
- "共存在16项违法事实！滴滴出行认罚80.26亿元" (2022)[URL]
- "【财智头条】事关反垄断, 阿里腾讯当报未报遭处罚" (2022)[URL]
- "数字经济成为经济新动能 平台企业肩负共富新使命" (2022)[URL]
- 百度百科, "中华人民共和国国家互联网信息办公室", ~ (2022)
- 百度百科, "国务院金融稳定发展委员会", ~ (2022)
- 百度百科, "黄益平(北京大学国发院副院长)", ~ (2022)
- "美团被罚34.42亿，王兴该何去何从？美团做得真的很差吗？" (2022)[URL]
- "中国互联网信息办公室：对移动应用程序严加监管" (2022)[URL]
- "社科院报告：互联网平台企业加快探索共富实践" (2022)[URL]
- "社科院报告：互联网平台企业在共同富裕建设中仍有相当大潜力" (2022)[URL]
- "刘鹤参加的这场重要会议，透露一个重要信息！" (2022)[URL]
- "刘鹤主持国务院金融委会议研究当前形势：有关部门要积极出台对市场有利的政策" (2022)[URL]
- "外媒关注：中国推动数字经济持续健康发展" (2022)[URL]