국가주도형 ADR과 민간주도형 ADR에 관한 연구
A Study on the National Leading ADR and Private Leading ADR
2
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
ADR is alternative dispute resolution that includes mediation, adjudication, arbitration, conciliation and ombudsman schemes. ADR may be an alternative to going to court or to a tribunal. The main types of ADR are conciliation, arbitration or mediation and ADR is divided into national leading ADR and private lading ADR and national leading ADR includes court-annexed ADR and administrative ADR. Court-annexed ADR has become a well established feature of the judicial systems on a global basis. The bulk of court-annexed ADR in Glove is by way of mediation. Thus each nation takes part in ADR by court involvement and Enactment of ADR-related Laws. And the involvement of nations have both the regulative character and promotive character in ADR. In addition to the national leading ADR, the private leading ADR also must be activated as United Kingdom. Thus this paper deals with national leading ADR and private leading ADR and the purpose of this paper is to contribute to the activation of ADR by studying the promotion and limited the involvement of nation in ADR and private leading ADR in United Kingdom.
Abstract
ADR is alternative dispute resolution that includes mediation, adjudication, arbitration, conciliation and ombudsman schemes. ADR may be an alternative to going to court or to a tribunal. The main types of ADR are conciliation, arbitration or mediation and ADR is divided into national leading ADR and private lading ADR and national leading ADR includes court-annexed ADR and administrative ADR. Court-annexed ADR has become a well established feature of the judicial systems on a global basis. The bulk of court-annexed ADR in Glove is by way of mediation. Thus each nation takes part in ADR by court involvement and Enactment of ADR-related Laws. And the involvement of nations have both the regulative character and promotive character in ADR. In addition to the national leading ADR, the private leading ADR also must be activated as United Kingdom. Thus this paper deals with national leading ADR and private leading ADR and the purpose of this paper is to contribute to the activation of ADR by studying the promotion and limited the involvement of nation in ADR and private leading ADR in United Kingdom.
참고문헌 (35)
- 김경배, "한국 대체적 분쟁해결제도(ADR)의 제도화 및 발전방안에 관한 연구", 산업경제연구, 18(1), pp.251~274 (2005), 한국산업경제학회
- 김선광, "전자상거래 분쟁발생시 사이버공간에서의 대안적 분쟁해결(ADR) 방안에 관한 연구", 통상정보연구, 5(1), pp.159~177 (2003), 한국통상정보학회
- 김선광, "국제상거래 분쟁해결을 위한 온라인 ADR모델 구축방안", 중재연구, 15(2), pp.3~35 (2005), 한국중재학회
- 신군재, "ADR을 통한 전자상거래 분쟁 해결방안에 관한 연구 -중재제도의 활용을 중심으로-", 국제상학, 17(2), pp.241~260 (2002), 한국국제상학회
- 유럽연합의 대체적분쟁해결(ADR)제도에 대한 연구, "박노형", 법제처, ~ (2008)
- 안제우, "온라인 분쟁해결의 발전을 위한 관련당사자의 책임", 중재연구, 16(1), pp.219~251 (2006), 한국중재학회
- 오원석, "사이버무역에서 중재의 역할과 온라인 중재에 관한 연구", 중재연구, 14(1), pp.61~101 (2004), 한국중재학회
- 우광명, "온라인 중재의 실행에 따른 법적 문제에 관한 고찰", 통상정보연구, 5(1), pp.137~158 (2003), 한국통상정보학회
- 윤선희, "ADR에서의 지적재산권분쟁", 한국중재학회 하계학술세미나 (2003), 한국중재학회
- 이로리, "ADR의 활성화와 법원의 역할 - 영국의 민,상사 법원중개제도를 중심으로 -", 경영법률, 19(3), pp.487~513 (2009), 한국경영법률학회
- 이영찬, "온라인 대체적분쟁해결제도에 관한 연구", 전자무역연구, 5(1), pp.43~61 (2007), 한국전자무역연구소
- 조원철, "법원연계형 ADR의 도입을 위한 법적 과제", 언론중재, 통권 : 114 (2010), 언론중재위원회
- 최석범, "온라인 ADR의 운영현황과 활성화 방안에 관한 연구", 중재연구, 18(3), pp.91~116 (2008), 한국중재학회
- 홍성규, "인터넷을 통한 온라인 ADR의 특성과 실현과제", 국제상학, 16(2) (2001), 한국국제상학회
- ADR人材養成に係ゐ海外動向に關する調査硏究報告書, "獨立行政法人經濟産業硏究所", ~ (2003)
- 西山 裕, "特集 英国におけるADR(裁判外紛争処理)について-環境紛争処理担当者の視点から見た状況", ちょうせい, (25) (2001), 総務庁公害等調整委員会
- 垣内秀介, "裁判官による和解勧試の法的規律(一)", 法学協会雑誌, 117(6) (2000), 法学協会
- 長谷部由起子, "法律扶助とADR. in: 日本の法律扶助―50年の歴史と課題" (2002), 財団法人法律扶助協会
- 田中成明, "現代社會と裁判-民事訴訟の位置と役割" (1996), 弘文堂
- 早川吉尙, "ADRの基本的視座" (2004), 不磨書房
- 竹井嗣人, "英国のADRの現状について", ちょうせい, (38) (1996), 総務庁公害等調整委員会
- 和田仁孝, "民事紛爭處理論" (1994), 信山社
- 和田仁孝, "ADR" (2002), 日本評論社
- Amy, D. J., "Environmental Dispute Resolution: The Promise and Pitfalls. in: Environment Policy in the 1990s: Toward a new agenda" (1990), CQ Press
- Bingham, G., "Resolving Environmental Disputes : A Decade of Experience" (1986), The Conversation Foundation
- Buckle, L. G., "Placing environmental mediation in context: lessons form 'failed' mediations", Environmental Impact Assess Review, 6(1) (1986)
- Genn, H., "Court-Based ADR Initiatives for Non-Family Civil Disputes: The Commercial court and the Court of Appeal" (2002)
- Goldsmith, Jean-Claude, "ADR in Business" (2006), Kulwer Law International
- Lord Chancellor`s Department, "Emerging Findings: An early evaluation of the Civil Justice Reforms", ~ (2001)
- Review of Civil Justice and Legal Aid-Report to the Lord Chancellor, "Middleton, Peter", ~ (1997)
- The Annual Pledge Report 2008, "09 -Monitoring the Effectiveness of the Government's Commitment to using Alternative Dispute Resolution", Ministry of Justice, 2010
- O'Leary, R., "Lessons Learned from two Decades of Alternative Dispute Resolution Programs and Process at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency", Public Administration Review, 61(6) (2001)
- Sipe, N, G., "Mediating environmental enforcement disputes: how well does it work?", Environmental Impact Assess Review, 15(2) (1995)
- Access to Justice : Interim Report to the Lord Chancellor on the civil justice in England and Wales, "The Lord Woolf", ~ (1995)
- Access to Justice, Final Report, "The Lord Woolf", Lord Chancellor's Department, ~ (1996)