중국 온라인중재규칙에 관한 연구
A Study on the Online Arbitration Rules in China
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission(CIETAC) released online arbitration rules which apply the resolution of disputes over electronic commerce transactions, as well as other economic and trade disputes in which the parties agree to do. The evidence submitted by the parties may be electronic evidence created, sent, received or stored by electronic, optical or magnetic means. Electronic evidence with a reliable electronic signature shall carry the same effect and probative force as a document with a hand-written signature. Where a case is tried in a tribunal, the arbitration tribunal shall conduct an online trial hearing using internet video conference or other electronic or computer communication means. Unless the parties have another agreement, summary procedure shall apply to cases where the amount in dispute exceeds RMB 100,000 but no more than RMB 1 million, or where the amount in dispute exceeds RMB 1 million and a party submits a written application for summary procedure after obtaining the written consent of the other party. Unless the parties have agreed otherwise, fast-track procedure shall apply to cases where the amount in dispute does not exceed RMB 100,000 or where the amount in dispute exceeds RMB 100,000 and a party submits a written application for fast-track procedure after obtaining the written consent of the other party. Notable features of the Online Rules are as follows; first, there is not detailed consideration for online arbitration. Second, communications between the parties and the tribunal are allowed only through the Secretariat. Third, elaborate provisions regarding the electronic submission and transmission of documents is provided for. Forth, various factors must be considered by the tribunal in deciding the evidence’s reliability. Fifth, reasonable endeavours is levied on CIETAC to keep data communications secure and encrypted. Sixth, the tribunal has the right to investigate and collect relevant evidence. And finally different procedures are provided for in consideration of the various types of E-commerce.
Abstract
The China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission(CIETAC) released online arbitration rules which apply the resolution of disputes over electronic commerce transactions, as well as other economic and trade disputes in which the parties agree to do. The evidence submitted by the parties may be electronic evidence created, sent, received or stored by electronic, optical or magnetic means. Electronic evidence with a reliable electronic signature shall carry the same effect and probative force as a document with a hand-written signature. Where a case is tried in a tribunal, the arbitration tribunal shall conduct an online trial hearing using internet video conference or other electronic or computer communication means. Unless the parties have another agreement, summary procedure shall apply to cases where the amount in dispute exceeds RMB 100,000 but no more than RMB 1 million, or where the amount in dispute exceeds RMB 1 million and a party submits a written application for summary procedure after obtaining the written consent of the other party. Unless the parties have agreed otherwise, fast-track procedure shall apply to cases where the amount in dispute does not exceed RMB 100,000 or where the amount in dispute exceeds RMB 100,000 and a party submits a written application for fast-track procedure after obtaining the written consent of the other party. Notable features of the Online Rules are as follows; first, there is not detailed consideration for online arbitration. Second, communications between the parties and the tribunal are allowed only through the Secretariat. Third, elaborate provisions regarding the electronic submission and transmission of documents is provided for. Forth, various factors must be considered by the tribunal in deciding the evidence’s reliability. Fifth, reasonable endeavours is levied on CIETAC to keep data communications secure and encrypted. Sixth, the tribunal has the right to investigate and collect relevant evidence. And finally different procedures are provided for in consideration of the various types of E-commerce.
참고문헌 (26)
- 강성모, "온라인분쟁해결(ODR)을 통한 분쟁해결상의 문제점과 활성화 방안에 대한 연구", 전자무역연구, 6(2), pp.91~120 (2008), 한국전자무역연구소
- 김상찬, "온라인 ADR을 통한 전자상거래 분쟁해결제도에 관한 연구", 중재연구, 20(1), pp.67~85 (2010), 한국중재학회
- 김석철, "중국중재제도의 국제표준화에 대한 연구", 중재연구, 18(3), pp.117~138 (2008), 한국중재학회
- 김선광, "현 법적 체제하에서의 온라인 중재의 허용성", 전자무역연구, 7(2), pp.113~133 (2009), 한국전자무역연구소
- 김선광, "온라인 분쟁해결의 새로운 패러다임 출현에 관한 소고", 전자무역연구, 9(2), pp.87~106 (2011), 한국전자무역연구소
- 김선광, "국제상거래 분쟁해결을 위한 온라인 ADR모델 구축방안", 중재연구, 15(2), pp.3~35 (2005), 한국중재학회
- 문창해, "중국의 중재절차에 대한 소개", 법학논총, 15(1) (2008), 조선대학교 법학연구원
- 양재훈, "우리나라의 ODR제도 활성화에 관한 연구", 국제상학, 22(4), pp.311~328 (2007), 한국국제상학회
- 오원석, "중국상사중재의 사법감독 실태와 개선방안", 중재연구, 20(2), pp.91~130 (2010), 한국중재학회
- 우광명, "중국의 온라인분쟁해결제도 실행과 법적 문제The Practices and Legal Issues of Online Dispute Resolution in China", 인터넷전자상거래연구, 6(2), pp.237~258 (2006), 한국인터넷전자상거래학회
- 兪炳昱, "온라인분쟁해결의 활용과 문제점에 관한 연구-온라인중재를 중심으로-", 무역상무연구, 19, pp.8~ (2003), 한국무역상무학회
- 윤광운, "중국의 도메인네임 분쟁사례연구", 국제상학, 18(3), pp.215~235 (2003), 한국국제상학회
- 윤진기, "중국 CIETAC 중재규칙상의 보전신청에 관한 연구", 중재연구, 13(2), pp.47~68 (2004), 한국중재학회
- 윤충원, "중국의 중재법상 중재기관 약정과 관련한 중재합의 유효요건에 관한 사례연구", 무역학회지, 32(3), pp.65~92 (2007), 한국무역학회
- 이영찬, "온라인 ADR의 활성화 방안에 관한 연구", 전자무역연구, 4(1), pp.75~95 (2006), 한국전자무역연구소
- 이영찬, "온라인 대체적분쟁해결제도에 관한 연구", 전자무역연구, 5(1), pp.43~61 (2007), 한국전자무역연구소
- 이주원, "중국 중재제도의 특징에 관한 소고", 중재연구, 15(3), pp.113~137 (2005), 한국중재학회
- 장두채, "국제무역에 있어서 전자상거래분쟁에 관한 연구†- 중국의 도메인네임과 상표분쟁을 중심으로 --", 국제상학, 19(4), pp.219~238 (2004), 한국국제상학회
- 정용균, "중국에서의 상사중재판정 집행에 관한 동향과 제도개선 연구 : 외국투자자 관점을 중심으로", 중재연구, 20(1), pp.133~167 (2010), 한국중재학회
- 차경자, "중국의 도메인네임 분쟁해결제도 -CIETAC의 DNDRC조정을 중심으로-", 국제상학, 23(4), pp.171~190 (2008), 한국국제상학회
- 차경자, "중국의 온라인중재 운용과 법적문제에 관한 연구 - CIETAC의 온라인중재를 중심으로", 중재연구, 20(2), pp.131~150 (2010), 한국중재학회
- 최석범, "중국국제상사중재제도의 운용실태와 개선방안", 중재연구, 14(2), pp.135~172 (2004), 한국중재학회
- 하현수, "중국의 국제상사중재 사법심사에 관한 연구", 국제상학, 22(3), pp.135~157 (2007), 한국국제상학회
- Hong, Xue, "Online Dispute Resolution in China", Proceedings of the UNECE Forum on DOR 2003 (2003)
- Hu, Li, "CIETAC Online ADR Practice: Domain Name Dispute Resolution System", 11th SOFTIC Symposium, Software Information Center (2002), Software Information Center
- Hu Li, "Introduction to Commercial Arbitration in China", 11th SOFTIC Symposium, Software Information Center (2002), Software Information Center