중국 광저우(廣州)중재위원회의 온라인중재 운용에 관한 연구
A Study on the Practices of Online Arbitration System of Guangzhou Arbitration Commission in China
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
There are more than two hundred arbitral institutions in China. Some of them are active in the development of online arbitration system, such as CIETAC and Guangzhou Arbitration Commission(GAC). GAC, founded in 1995, is the second largest arbitral institution in China which accepts more than 4,000 cases a year. With extensive experiences in arbitration, GAC has conducted online arbitration procedures since 2007. Moreover it opened the whole process of online hearing to the public through the Internet. With this background, this article aims to support the development of online arbitration through the analysis of GAC practices. To meet the purpose, status quo, rules and procedure of online arbitration of GAC are outlined, followed by introducing nine cases conducted by GAC. The scope of GAC online arbitration is comparatively narrow and the institution is still under the government supervision. But the practices of GAC proved that online arbitration is fully admissible and effective under the current legal framework.
Abstract
There are more than two hundred arbitral institutions in China. Some of them are active in the development of online arbitration system, such as CIETAC and Guangzhou Arbitration Commission(GAC). GAC, founded in 1995, is the second largest arbitral institution in China which accepts more than 4,000 cases a year. With extensive experiences in arbitration, GAC has conducted online arbitration procedures since 2007. Moreover it opened the whole process of online hearing to the public through the Internet. With this background, this article aims to support the development of online arbitration through the analysis of GAC practices. To meet the purpose, status quo, rules and procedure of online arbitration of GAC are outlined, followed by introducing nine cases conducted by GAC. The scope of GAC online arbitration is comparatively narrow and the institution is still under the government supervision. But the practices of GAC proved that online arbitration is fully admissible and effective under the current legal framework.
참고문헌 (16)
- 신군재, "중국 중재제도의 특성에 관한 사례 연구", 무역학회지, 33(5) (2008)
- 신군재, "KCAB 국제중재규칙과 CIETAC 중재규칙의 비교연구", 중재연구, 18(2), pp.33~54 (2008), 한국중재학회
- 윤충원, "중국의 중재법상 중재기관 약정과 관련한 중재합의 유효요건에 관한 사례연구", 무역학회지, 32(3), pp.65~92 (2007), 한국무역학회
- 윤진기, "중국 CIETAC 중재규칙상의 보전신청에 관한 연구", 중재연구, 13(2), pp.47~68 (2004), 한국중재학회
- 윤진기, "2005년 CIETAC 중재규칙 개정과 중국 중재법상의 문제점 개선", 중재연구, 16(3), pp.91~125 (2006), 한국중재학회
- 우광명, "중국국제경제무역중재위원회의 중재규칙에 관한 연구", 중재연구, 16(1), pp.121~151 (2006), 한국중재학회
- 이주원, "중국 중재제도의 특징에 관한 소고", 중재연구, 15(3), pp.113~137 (2005), 한국중재학회
- 차경자, "중국의 도메인네임 분쟁해결제도 -CIETAC의 DNDRC조정을 중심으로-", 국제상학, 23(4), pp.171~190 (2008), 한국국제상학회
- 차경자, "중국의 온라인중재 운용과 법적문제에 관한 연구 - CIETAC의 온라인중재를 중심으로", 중재연구, 20(2), pp.131~150 (2010), 한국중재학회
- 최석범, "중국국제상사중재제도의 운용실태와 개선방안", 중재연구, 14(2), pp.135~172 (2004), 한국중재학회
- Stephan Wilske, "The Impact of the Financial Crisis on International Arbitration", Dispute Resolution Journal (2010)
- 中國國家統計局, "2009年中國統計年鑑" (2009), 中國統計出版社
- "대한상사중재원"[URL]
- "廣州仲裁委員會"[URL]
- "中國商事仲裁网"[URL]
- "中國仲裁网"[URL]