본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

일본 ADR법상 인증제도의 현황과 과제

Current State and Challenges of Japans' Accreditation System in ADR Act

0

조회

0

다운로드

17

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류무역학

초록

ARD Act in Japan was proclaimed on 1 December 2004, and since the act was enforced on 1 April 2007, five years have passed. ADR Act enables qualified dispute resolution businesses to be the certified ADR business holders through the government's accreditation system, contributing greatly to the advancement of a private ADR. As of June 2012, the number of ADR institutes certified by the government has increased to 112. In Article 2 of the supplementary provisions of Japan's ADR Act, it provides for as follows: “The government should review the progress of the Act five years after the enforcement, and find measures, if recognized as necessary, based on the results". Any problems revealed in the process of implementing the Act is expected to be revised at the point of 5 years after the enforcement. To this end, the academic circle established an association called ‘Arbitration ADR Act Society’ in 2004, considering issues of ADR Act and considering measures to improve the legislation, make policy suggestions, and to improve the Act management, through seminars, forums, and journal. The Japanese ADR Association composed of ADR institutions as members, came to put forward a suggestion entitled "Towards the revision of ADR Act" to the Ministry of Justice on April 2, 2012. This paper intends to identify the current state of the accreditation system, one of the most important systems under ADR Act in Japan, in terms of the consideration of the ADR Act revision. The consideration includes particularly measures to improve the accreditation system as well as data analysis on accreditation application, the current state of accredited institutions, ADR performance of the accredited ADR businesses. In Korea, the ADR Act has not been legislated yet although the issue is actively taken into consideration. This paper will be a meaningful reference for the Korean government to develop an accreditation system for legislating the ADR Act, in the future.

Abstract

ARD Act in Japan was proclaimed on 1 December 2004, and since the act was enforced on 1 April 2007, five years have passed. ADR Act enables qualified dispute resolution businesses to be the certified ADR business holders through the government's accreditation system, contributing greatly to the advancement of a private ADR. As of June 2012, the number of ADR institutes certified by the government has increased to 112. In Article 2 of the supplementary provisions of Japan's ADR Act, it provides for as follows: “The government should review the progress of the Act five years after the enforcement, and find measures, if recognized as necessary, based on the results". Any problems revealed in the process of implementing the Act is expected to be revised at the point of 5 years after the enforcement. To this end, the academic circle established an association called ‘Arbitration ADR Act Society’ in 2004, considering issues of ADR Act and considering measures to improve the legislation, make policy suggestions, and to improve the Act management, through seminars, forums, and journal. The Japanese ADR Association composed of ADR institutions as members, came to put forward a suggestion entitled "Towards the revision of ADR Act" to the Ministry of Justice on April 2, 2012. This paper intends to identify the current state of the accreditation system, one of the most important systems under ADR Act in Japan, in terms of the consideration of the ADR Act revision. The consideration includes particularly measures to improve the accreditation system as well as data analysis on accreditation application, the current state of accredited institutions, ADR performance of the accredited ADR businesses. In Korea, the ADR Act has not been legislated yet although the issue is actively taken into consideration. This paper will be a meaningful reference for the Korean government to develop an accreditation system for legislating the ADR Act, in the future.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. 김상찬, "일본의 ADR法에 관한 硏究", 중재연구, 16(3), pp.127~160 (2006), 한국중재학회
  2. 김상찬, "ADR基本法의 立法論에 관한 硏究", 중재연구, 13(2), pp.157~179 (2004), 한국중재학회
  3. 대체적분쟁해결처리제도(ADR)도입방안, "전병서", 사법제도개혁추진위원회, ~ (2005)
  4. 정선주, "ADR통일절차법의 제정에 대한 연구", 민사소송, 11(1), pp.284~311 (2007), 한국민사소송법학회
  5. 최건호, "일본의 ADR제도", 민사소송, 10(1), pp.288~326 (2006), 한국민사소송법학회
  6. 高松宏之, "ADR認證制度の現狀", 法律のひろば, 63(9) (2010), ぎょうせい
  7. 內堀宏達, "裁判外紛爭解決手續の利用の促進に關する法律の槪要", 法律のひろば (2005), ぎょうせい
  8. 山本和彦, "認證ADR事業者に対するアンケート結果の槪要", 仲裁とADR, 5 (2010), 仲裁ADR協會
  9. 山本和彦, "裁判外紛爭解決手續の利用促進に關する法律の意義と今後の課題", 法律のひろば, 58(4) (2005), ぎょうせい
  10. 山本和彦, "ADR法の現狀と課題", 法律のひろば, 63(9) (2010), ぎょうせい
  11. 山本和彦, "ADR仲裁法" (2008), 日本評論社
  12. 山田文, "日本ADR協會の設立について", 法の支配, 161 (2011)
  13. 山田文, "ADR法制定と理論的問題", 法律時報, 77(2) (2005), 日本評論社
  14. 小林徹, "日本におけるADRの將來に向けて-‘ADR檢討會’座長レポートー", 裁判外紛爭解決促進法 (2005), 商事法務
  15. 深山卓也, "法務省からみたADR法の現狀", 仲裁とADR, 5 (2010), 仲裁ADR協會
  16. 垣內秀介, "提言「ADR法の改正に向けて」について", NBL, 975 (2012), 商事法務
  17. 提言-ADR法の改正に向けて, "日本ADR協會", ~ (2012)
  18. 林圭介, "大阪地裁建築․調停事件における現狀と課題", 判例タイムズ, 1300 (2009), 判例タイムズ社
  19. 町村泰貴, "ADR新時代", ジュリースト, 1317 (2006), 有斐閣
  20. 佐佐木文, "法テラスに寄せられる法的トブルとADR", 法律のひろば, 63(9) (2010), ぎょうせい
  21. 竹下守夫, "司法制度改革審議會における審議過程からみたADR法の狀況", 仲裁とADR, 5 (2010), 仲裁ADR協會
  22. 靑山善充, "ADR檢討會の議論からみたADR法の現狀", 仲裁とADR, 5 (2010), 仲裁ADR協會
  23. 河井聰, "日本ADR協會に期待される役割と活動について", 仲裁とADR, 6 (2011), 仲裁ADR協會

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)