본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

ICSID 상소제도의 도입 필요성

The Necessity for Introduction of ICSID Appellate System

김용일
한국중재학회 (Korean Association Of Arbitration Studies(Kaas))|2019.12|중재연구 (JOURNAL OF ARBITRATION STUDIES)|제29권 제4호|pp. 187-210

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

국제투자분쟁International Investment DisputesWTO Appellate BodyWTO 분쟁해결기구WTO Dispute Settlement BodyWTO 상소제도ICSID 상소제도ICSID 특별위원회ICSID Appellate SystemICSID Ad hoc Committee.
주제분류무역학

초록

본 논문에서는 WTO AB의 상대적인 성공을 고려하여 ICSID 상소제도 도입에 대한 찬성론을 제시한다. 이를 위하여 서론에 이어 제Ⅱ장에서는 WTO 상소기구, 상소절차 그리고 상소기구의 활용을 중심으로 WTO 상소제도를 검토하며, 제Ⅲ장에서는 ICSID 중재의 취소사유, 사례분석 그리고 한계를 중심으로 ICSID 취소제도를 간략히 살펴본다. 나아가 제Ⅳ장에서는 ICSID 중재 시스템에서 특별위원회가 매우 제한된 권한만을 가지고 있다는 사실로 인하여 ICSID가 그 정당성을 의심 받는 위기에 빠졌음을 전제로 ICSID 상소제도 도입 필요성과 이에 따른 문제점을 고찰한다.

Abstract

This article examines the necessity for the introduction of an ICSID Appellate System. In comparison with the WTO appellate system, the ICSID ad hoc Committee has a very limited mandate. An annulment inquiry under the ICSID arbitration system barely focuses on whether the arbitral decision resulted from a justifiable process. As long as there is procedural legitimacy, the resulting awards remain unaffected under the annulment procedure, irrespective of mistakes of fact or law. In contrast, in the WTO DSS the AB substantively reviews panel rulings and suggestions that are founded on any deficiency of objectivity or error in the interpretation of a particular WTO provision. This defect intrinsic in the annulment procedure could cause injustice to a party earnestly interested in correcting recognized misapplication of law by ICSID tribunals. Accordingly, the establishment of an appellate system would result in a more substantive and procedural review of awards. The creation of such an ICSID appellate system would ensure thorough scrutiny of the decisions of the tribunal of first instance, leading to better reasoned outcomes. This could lead to a crystallization of predictability in investment relations. The end result would be that fairness, clarity, reliability, and legality in the ICSID adjudicative process would be unassailable, to the advantage of all the contracting parties.

참고문헌 (47)

  1. 김여선, "국제투자규범의 ISDS체제 개혁에 관한 연구", 국제거래와 법, (26), pp.151~181 (2019), 법학연구소[DOI]
  2. 김용일, "ICSID 협약 제52조의 계약상 포기에 관한 연구", 중재연구, 28(1), pp.3~26 (2018), 한국중재학회[DOI]
  3. 류병운, "ICSID 중재 제도의 개혁 방향", 홍익법학, 18(4), pp.87~116 (2017), 법학연구소[DOI]
  4. 류병운, "WTO 분쟁해결 제도와 투자자-국가 중재 제도의 조화: 담배 상표 및 포장규제를 중심으로", 무역상무연구, 81, pp.47~72 (2019), 한국무역상무학회[DOI]
  5. 박노형, "WTO체제의 분쟁해결제도 연구" (1997), 박영사
  6. 오원석, "ICSID 중재의 취소제도에 관한 제 고찰", 중재연구, 24(4), pp.3~28 (2014), 한국중재학회[DOI]
  7. 전정원, "Annulment of ICSID Awards - Focusing on the Annulment of the Tidewater Award -", 강원법학, 53, pp.661~699 (2018), 비교법학연구소[DOI]
  8. 주정, "WTO DSB의 운영 현황 분석을 통한 문제점 및 개선방안 연구", 중재연구, 27(4), pp.155~175 (2017), 한국중재학회[DOI]
  9. Aronson, B.M., "A New Framework for ICSID Annulment Jurisprudence: Rethinking the Three Generations", Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law, 6(1) (2012)
  10. Bjorklund, A.K., "The Continuing Appeal of Annulment? Lessons from Amco Asia and CME", International Investment Law and Arbitration, ~ (2005)
  11. Brower, C.N., "Is Arbitration a Threat or a Boon to the Legitimacy of International Investment Law?", Chicago Journal of International Law, 27(4) (2009)
  12. The Independence and Impartiality of ICSID Arbitrators, "Cleis, M.N.", ~, pp.NijhoffInternational Investment Law Series, Volume: 8 (2017)
  13. Collins, D., "ICSID Annulment Committee Appointments: Too Much Discretion for the Chairman?", Journal of International Arbitration, 30(4) (2013)
  14. Congyan, C., "Structure of Arbitrators and its Implications Towards ICSID Mechanism : An Empirical Analysis", Journal of World Investment & Trade, 9 (2008)
  15. Ehlermann, C. D., "Experiences from the WTO Appellate Body", Texas International Law Journal, 38 (2005)
  16. Fernandez-Armesto, J., "Different Systems for the Annulment of Investment Awards", ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal, 26(Spring) (2011)
  17. Franck, S., "Development and Outcomes of Investment Treaty Arbitration", Harvard International Law Journal, 50(2) (2009)
  18. Friedland, P., "Rabid Redux: The Second Wave of Abusive ICSID Annulments", American University International Law Review, 27(4) (2012)
  19. Harhay, L. D., "Investment Arbitration in 2021 : A Look to Diversity and Consistency", World Arbitration and Mediation Review, 8(3) (2014)
  20. Possible Improvements of the Framework for ICSID Arbitration, "ICSID", ICSID, ~ (2004)
  21. ICSID, "ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal, Vol. 26", ~ (2011)
  22. Kalb, J., "Creating An ICSID Appellate Body", UCLA JOURNAL OFINTERNATIONAL LAW AND FOREIGN AFFAIRS, 10 (2005)
  23. Kidane, W., "The China - Africa Factor in the Contemporary ICSID Legitimacy Debate", University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, 35(Spring) (2014)
  24. Kim, D., "The Annulment Committee’s Role in Multiplying Inconsistency in ICSID Arbitration: The Need to Move Away From an Annulment - Based System", New York University Law Review, 86(1) (2011)
  25. Kotuby, C.T., "Practical Suggestions to Promote the Legitimacy and Vitality of International Investment Arbitration", ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal, 28(Fall) (2013)
  26. Lacarte-Muro, J., "Developing Countries and the WTO Legal and Dispute Settlement System: A view from the Bench", Journal ofInternational Economic Law, 3 (2000)
  27. Laird, I., "Finality versus Consistency: Does Investor-StateArbitration Need an Appellate System?", THE JOURNAL OF APPELLATE PRACTICE AND PROCESS, 7(2) (2005)
  28. Lester, S., "The Development of Standards of Appellate Review for Factual, Legal and Law Application Questions in WTO Dispute Settlement", Trade, Law and Development, 4(1) (2012)
  29. McRae, D., "The WTO Appellate Body: A Model for an ICSID Appeals Facility", Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 1(2) (2010)
  30. McRae, D., "What is the Future of WTO Dispute Settlement?", Journal of International Economic Law, 7 (2004)
  31. Mestral, A., "Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO Legal System" (2006), Oxford University Press
  32. Ngangjoh-Hodu, Y., "ICSID Annulment Procedure and the WTO Appellate System: The Case for an Appellate System for Investment Arbitration", Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 6 (2015)
  33. Quayat, D., "The Forest for the Trees: A Roadmap to Canada’s Litigation Experience in Lumber IV", Journal of International Economic Law, 12(1) (2009)
  34. Precedent in the Settlement of International Economic Disputes: The WTO and Investment Arbitration Models, "Sacerdoti, G.", ~, pp.Bacconi Legal Studies Research Papers No. 1931560 (2011)
  35. Saldarriaga, A., "Investment Awards and the Rules of Interpretation of the Vienna Convention: Making Room for Improvement", ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal, 28(Spring) (2013)
  36. Schneider, A. K., "Error Correction and Dispute System Design in Investor –State Arbitration", Yearbook on Arbitration and Mediation, 5 (2013)
  37. Schreuer, C.H., "From ICSID Annulment to Appeal: Halfway Down the Slippery Slope", The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals, 10 (2009)
  38. Schreuer, C.H., "The ICSID Convention: A Commentary" (2001), Cambridge University Press
  39. Schreuer, C.H., "Revising the System of Review for Investment Awards" (2009), BIICL publication
  40. Schwebel, S.M., "The Overwhelming Merits of Bilateral Investment Treaties", Suffolk Transnational Law Review, (Summer) (2009)
  41. Smith, C., "The Appeal of ICSID Awards: How the AMINZ Appellate Mechanism can Guide Reform of ICSID Procedure", Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, 41 (2013)
  42. Ten I. M., "International Arbitration and the Ends of Appellate Review", New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 44 (2012)
  43. Denunciation of the ICSID convention and BITS: impact on investor-state claims, "UNCTAD", IIA, ~, pp.IIA Issues Note, No. 2 (2010)
  44. UNCTAD, "Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement: In Search of a Roadmap", ~ (2013)
  45. Voon, T, "The Facts Aside: The Limitations of WTO Appeals to Issues of Law", Journal of World Trade, 40(2) (2006)
  46. Walsh, T. W., "Substantive Review of ICISD Awards: Is the Desire for Accuracy Sufficient to Compromise Finality?", Berkeley Journal of International Law, 24 (2006)
  47. Yackee, J. W., "Towards a Minimalist System of International Investment Law", Suffolk Transnational Law Review, 32(2) (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

ICSID 중재판정 취소제도김상찬한국중재학회 · 중재연구2015 · 제25권 제2호상소심 도입 및 제3자 참여의 확대를 통한 투자자-국가 중재 시스템의 제도적 개선김대중민사법의 이론과 실무학회 · 민사법의 이론과 실무2012 · 제15권 제2호ICSID 중재판정의 취소를 통한 불복김용일, 오현석한국중재학회 · 중재연구2021 · 제31권 제1호ICSID 중재 제도의 개혁 방향류병운법학연구소 · 홍익법학2017 · 제18권 제4호ICSID 協約上 取消制度의 性格 및 取消事由에 관한 小考:明白한 越權 및 理由 未記載를 中心으로박건도한국법정책학회 · 법과정책연구2010 · 제10권 제3호론스타의 투자조약중재 제기 쟁점과 한국 정부의 전략적 대응방안김성룡, 오현석한국중재학회 · 중재연구2017 · 제27권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)

개성공단 분쟁해결 제도 정비방안 - 남북상사중재제도를 중심으로황보 현pp. 3-31남북한 경제협력 클레임 현황과 개선방안에 관한 연구고재길pp. 33-55중재 관련 상계항변에 관한 고찰강수미pp. 57-75Third Party Funding in International Arbitration and its most current Development in Asia-Issue of Security for Costs and its main Cases김세진, 김대중pp. 77-100아시아 중재 선진국의 국제중재 허브 육성전략 사례 분석 및 시사점- 싱가포르와 홍콩을 중심으로 -이상하, 하충룡pp. 101-120
원문 보기