본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

미중 패권경쟁과 중남미 외교전략: 중견국 브라질과 멕시코를 중심으로

US-China hegemony competition and Latin American diplomatic strategy: Focusing on middle powers Mexico and Brazil

김기현
한국라틴아메리카학회 (Latin American Studies Association Of Korea)|2024.04|라틴아메리카연구 (Asian Journal of Latinamerican Studies)|제37권 제1호|pp. 1-35|DOI 10.22945/ajlas.2024.37.1.1

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

autonomy자율종속dependency미중 패권경쟁능동적 비동맹 전략중남미 외교전략US-China hegemony competitionLatin American diplomatic strategyActive Non-Alignment strategy
주제분류지역학

초록

In order to examine Latin American diplomatic strategies in response to the US-China hegemony competition, this article will first examine Latin American diplomatic strategies at a theoretical level, focusing on three keywords: ‘dependency’, ‘autonomy’, and ‘agency’. Based on that, we will analyze the recently discussed ‘Active Non-Alignment’ strategy and examine the various positions of Latin American countries regarding it. At a practical level, we would like to compare and analyze the diplomatic strategies and choices of Brazil and Mexico, which can be considered representative middle powers in Latin America. Such analysis will focus on the two countries' multilateralism strategy at the global level and regional integration strategy that are essential to the success of the NAA strategy. Finally, I will attempt to draw on the historical experience of major Latin American countries' diplomatic choices to provide an outlook for their future choices between the U.S. and China.

Abstract

In order to examine Latin American diplomatic strategies in response to the US-China hegemony competition, this article will first examine Latin American diplomatic strategies at a theoretical level, focusing on three keywords: ‘dependency’, ‘autonomy’, and ‘agency’. Based on that, we will analyze the recently discussed ‘Active Non-Alignment’ strategy and examine the various positions of Latin American countries regarding it. At a practical level, we would like to compare and analyze the diplomatic strategies and choices of Brazil and Mexico, which can be considered representative middle powers in Latin America. Such analysis will focus on the two countries' multilateralism strategy at the global level and regional integration strategy that are essential to the success of the NAA strategy. Finally, I will attempt to draw on the historical experience of major Latin American countries' diplomatic choices to provide an outlook for their future choices between the U.S. and China.

참고문헌 (52)

  1. Acharya, Amitav, "Whose Ideas Matter? Agency and Power in Asian Regionalism" (2009), Cornell University Press
  2. Acharya, Amitav, "Global International Relations(IR)and Regional Worlds", International Studies Quarterly, 58(4), pp.647~659 (2014)
  3. Acharya, Amitav, "Non-Western International Relations Theory : Perspectives on and Beyond Asia" (2010), Routledge
  4. Amorim, Celso, "El no alineamiento activo y América Latina. Una doctrina para el nuevo siglo, Santiago", pp.513~533 (2021), Catalonia
  5. Bárcena, Alicia, "El no alineamiento activo y América Latina. Una doctrina para el nuevo siglo, Santiago", pp.294~322 (2021), Catalonia
  6. Cardoso, Fernando Henrique, "Dependencia y Desarrollo En América Latina. Ensayo de Interpretación Sociológica" (1969), Siglo XXI Editores
  7. Castañeda, Jorge, "El no alineamiento activo y América Latina. Una doctrina para el nuevo siglo, Santiago", pp.278~292 (2021), Catalonia
  8. Chagas-Bastos, "Latin America in Global International Relations", pp.202~219 (2022), Routledge. Taylor and Francis
  9. Deciancio, M., "International relations from the south: A regional research agenda for global IR", International Studies Review, 18(1), pp.106~119 (2016)
  10. Dos Santos, Theotonio, "The Structure of Dependence", The American Economic Review, 60(2), pp.231~236 (1970)
  11. Escudé, Carlos, "Foreign Policy Theory in Menem’s Argentina" (1997), University Press of Florida
  12. Escudé, Carlos, "Routledge Handbook of Latin America in the World", pp.45~57 (2014), Routledge
  13. Frank, André Gunder, "Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America:Historical Studies of Chile and Brazil" (1969), Monthly Review Press
  14. "El no alineamiento activo: un camino para América Latina" (2020)[URL]
  15. Fortín, Carlos, "El no alineamiento activo y América Latina. Una doctrina para el nuevo siglo, Santiago", pp.9~39 (2021), Catalonia
  16. Furtado, Celso, "Subdesarrollo y Estancamiento En América Latina" (1966), Eudeba
  17. Gilley, Bruce, "Middle Powers and the Rise of China" (2014), Georgetown University Press
  18. Heine, Jorge, "El no alineamiento activo y América Latina. Una doctrina para el nuevo siglo", pp.42~74 (2021), Catalonia
  19. Herz, Monica, "El no alineamiento activo y América Latina. Una doctrina para el nuevo siglo, Santiago", pp.186~212 (2021), Catalonia
  20. Insulza, José Miguel, "El no alineamiento activo y América Latina. Una doctrina para el nuevo siglo", pp.445~469 (2021), Catalonia
  21. Jaguaribe, Helio, "Autonomía periférica y hegemonía céntrica", Estudios Internacionales, 46(9), pp.1~130 (1979)
  22. Jordaan, Eduard, "The Concept of a Middle Power in International Relations : Distinguishing between Emerging and Traditional Middle Powers", Politikon : South African Journal of Political Studies, 30(1), pp.165~181 (2003)
  23. Kacowicz, Arie M., "Latin America in Global International Relations", pp.11~30 (2022), Taylor and Francis
  24. Kim, Woo-Sang, "Middle power strategy : Korea’s smart diplomacy between the US and China" (2016), Sechang
  25. Maihold, Günther, "BRICS, MIST, MIKTA: México entre poderes emergentes, potencias medias y responsabilidad global", Revista Mexicana de Política Exterior, (100), pp.63~79 (2014)
  26. Maihold, Günther, "Mexico : A leader in search of like-minded peers", International Journal, 71(4), pp.545~562 (2016)
  27. Malamud, Andrés, "Has Regionalism Peaked? The Latin American Quagmire and Its Lessons", The International Spectator : Italian Journal of International Affairs, 47(1), pp.116~133 (2012)
  28. Mares, David R., "Middle Powers under Regional Hegemony: To Challenge or Acquiesce in Hegemonic Enforcement", International Studies Quarterly, 32(4), pp.453~471 (1988)
  29. "Geopolitics and the geometry of global trade" (2024)[URL]
  30. Marini, Ruy Mauro, "América Latina, Dependencia y Globalización", pp.107~164 (2018), CLACSO
  31. Natanson, José, "La nueva nueva izquierda", Nueva Sociedad, (299), pp.25~34 (2022)
  32. Palestini, Stefano, "Latin America in Global International Relations", pp.182~201 (2022), Taylor and Francis
  33. "El ‘no alineamiento activo’ y América Latina en el orden global" (2022)[URL]
  34. Mexico-a Reluctant Middle Power? New powers for Global Change?, "Pellicer, Olga", FES, 1~10 (2006)
  35. Puig, Juan Carlos, "Doctrinas Internacionales y Autonomía Latinoamericana" (1980), Instituto de Altos Estudios de América Latina, Universidad Simón Bolívar
  36. Roncagliolo, Rafael, "El no alineamiento activo y América Latina. Una doctrina para el nuevo siglo, Santiago", pp.490~510 (2021), Catalonia
  37. Russell, Roberto, "From Antagonistic to Relational Autonomy : A Theoretical Reflection from the Southern Cone", Latin American Politics and Society, (45), pp.1~24 (2003)
  38. Schulz, Carsten-Andreas, "Latin America in Global International Relations", pp.31~48 (2022), Taylor and Francis
  39. Sotelo Valencia, Adrían, "Entrevista a Ruy Mauro Marini: Las perspectivas de la teoría de la dependencia en la década de los noventa", Estudios Latinoamericanos, 5(9), pp.49~58 (1990)[DOI]
  40. Spanakos, Anthony Peter, "Middle Powers and the Rise of China", pp.213~236 (2014), Georgetown University Press
  41. Stuenkel, Oliver, "El no alineamiento activo y América Latina. Una doctrina para el nuevo siglo, Santiago", pp.258~277 (2021), Catalonia
  42. Stuenkel, Oliver, "Latin America in Global International Relations", pp.109~125 (2022), Taylor and Francis
  43. "Courting Lula, China Seeks to Show It Has More to Offer than the U.S" (2023)[URL]
  44. Sunkel, Osvaldo, "Desarrollo, Subdesarrollo, Dependencia, Marginación y Desigualdades Espaciales: Hacia Un Enfoque Totalizante", Revista EURE, 1(1), pp.13~49 (1970)
  45. Tickner, Arlene B., "Hearing Latin American Voices in International Relations Studies", International Studies Perspectives, (4), pp.325~350 (2003)
  46. Taiana, Jorge, "El no alineamiento activo y América Latina. Una doctrina para el nuevo siglo, Santiago", pp.471~489 (2021), Catalonia
  47. "Mexico’s foreign policy is unambitious and erratic" (2023)[URL]
  48. "Lula’s gaffes are dulling Brazil’s G20 shine" (2024)[URL]
  49. "La diplomacia de equidistancia, una propuesta estratégica" (2021)[URL]
  50. "Latin America Doesn’t Want a New Cold War" (2022)[URL]
  51. Tussie, Diana, "El no alineamiento activo y América Latina. Una doctrina para el nuevo siglo, Santiago", pp.415~443 (2021), Catalonia
  52. Tussie, Diana, "Latin America in Global International Relations", pp.1~10 (2022), Routledge. Taylor and Francis

관련 논문AI추천

멕시코의 중견국 외교: 대미 종속과 경제-안보 복합의 딜레마최경준동아시아국제정치학회 · 국제정치연구2020 · 제23권 제2호미-중 경쟁 속에서 중남미의 선택 : 중국-CELAC 포럼의 공동행동계획(2022~2024)을 중심으로최금좌한국국회학회 · 한국과 세계2022 · 제4권 제5호중국은 중남미에서 미국의 헤게모니를 위협하고 있는가?김기현한국라틴아메리카학회 · 라틴아메리카연구2023 · 제36권 제1호미‧중 패권전쟁과 한국의 생존전략현인택신아시아연구소 · 신아세아2021 · 제28권 제2호지정학적 중견국과 비지정학적 중견국 간의 협력모델 연구: 한국-브라질 관계를 중심으로조희문한국 포르투갈-브라질 학회 · 포르투갈-브라질 연구2025 · 제22권 제2호글로벌 사우스(Global South)에 대한 중국의 논의, 전략과 과제이동률성균중국연구원 · 중국사회과학논총2024 · 제6권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)

브라질 온실가스 배출의 변동요인 분석박미숙pp. 37-60풀뿌리 환경주의의 관점에서 본 라틴아메리카 토지의 의미 변화: 멕시코 EZLN과 브라질 MST 사례를 중심으로서지현pp. 61-79통합지수를 활용한 MERCOSUR와 태평양동맹(PA)의 역내·외통합 분석윤여준, 홍성우pp. 81-108
원문 보기