중국에서의 상사중재판정 집행에 관한 동향과 제도개선 연구 : 외국투자자 관점을 중심으로
The Current Status and New Regulatory Arrangements of the Enforcement of Commercial Arbitration Awards in China from the Foreign Investor's Perspective
0
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The enforcement of commercial arbitration awards in the People's Republic of China is one the controversial obstacles faced by foreign investors in China. The foreign investor will fail to enforce the arbitration award, if the Chinese court refuses the enforcement in China, even if the arbitration tribunal rules the award in favor of foreign investor who is in dispute with Chinese partners. In Korea, we have not many researches in the enforcement of foreign related awards and awards ruled by other jurisdiction. In recent times, Professor Kyung-Ja Cha(2005) and Professor Sun-Jeong Kim(2008) analyzed the enforcement of arbitration awards in China. Professor Kyung-Ja Cha(2005) reports the details of the enforcement statistics of CIETAC during 1990s. Professor Sun-Jeong Kim(2008) analyzed the obstacles of the enforcement of foreign related awards in China. This paper extends their researches in the field of the enforcement of arbitration awards in China. First, this paper extends Professor Kyung-Ja Cha(2005)'s study by introducing the Chinese enforcement situation during the period of 2000-2007. Second, this paper extends Professor Sunjung Kim(2008) emphasizes the local protectionism and the weakness of judiciary as key factors of obstacles to enforce the foreign related awards in People's Republic of China. This paper, additionally, highlights the role of the Guanxi and the antagonism of court toward arbitration institution to enforce the foreign related awards in People's Republic of China. Third, this study provides the recent developments of Supreme People's Court(SPC)'s rules to narrow down the gap between the practices of international arbitration and those of People's Republic of China. The Implications of this study are as follows. First, it is desirable for foreign investors to appoint the CIETAC or BAC as the arbitration commission in China. Second, the local competent attorney is the best choice to solve the respondent's insolvency in China. Third, foreign investors is required to monitor the provisions on the electronic instruments such as EDI and Email in Chinese law.
Abstract
The enforcement of commercial arbitration awards in the People's Republic of China is one the controversial obstacles faced by foreign investors in China. The foreign investor will fail to enforce the arbitration award, if the Chinese court refuses the enforcement in China, even if the arbitration tribunal rules the award in favor of foreign investor who is in dispute with Chinese partners. In Korea, we have not many researches in the enforcement of foreign related awards and awards ruled by other jurisdiction. In recent times, Professor Kyung-Ja Cha(2005) and Professor Sun-Jeong Kim(2008) analyzed the enforcement of arbitration awards in China. Professor Kyung-Ja Cha(2005) reports the details of the enforcement statistics of CIETAC during 1990s. Professor Sun-Jeong Kim(2008) analyzed the obstacles of the enforcement of foreign related awards in China. This paper extends their researches in the field of the enforcement of arbitration awards in China. First, this paper extends Professor Kyung-Ja Cha(2005)'s study by introducing the Chinese enforcement situation during the period of 2000-2007. Second, this paper extends Professor Sunjung Kim(2008) emphasizes the local protectionism and the weakness of judiciary as key factors of obstacles to enforce the foreign related awards in People's Republic of China. This paper, additionally, highlights the role of the Guanxi and the antagonism of court toward arbitration institution to enforce the foreign related awards in People's Republic of China. Third, this study provides the recent developments of Supreme People's Court(SPC)'s rules to narrow down the gap between the practices of international arbitration and those of People's Republic of China. The Implications of this study are as follows. First, it is desirable for foreign investors to appoint the CIETAC or BAC as the arbitration commission in China. Second, the local competent attorney is the best choice to solve the respondent's insolvency in China. Third, foreign investors is required to monitor the provisions on the electronic instruments such as EDI and Email in Chinese law.
참고문헌 (39)
- 김경배, "외국중재판정의 집행판결에서 나타난 집행거부사유에 관한 고찰", 중재연구, 14(1), pp.213~244 (2004), 한국중재학회
- 김선정, "중국에 있어서 외국중재판정의 승인 및 집행 거절 사유인 공서와 법의 지배", 중재연구, 18(3), pp.23~50 (2008), 한국중재학회
- 목영준, "상사중재법론" (2001), 박영사
- 신군재, "중국 중재제도의 특성에 관한 사례 연구", 무역학회지, 29(4), pp.211~230 (2004), 한국무역학회
- 신창섭, "우리나라와 중국 중재법에서 중재판정의 취소사유에 관한 연구", 중재연구, 16(2), pp.51~88 (2006), 한국중재학회
- 양소검, "중국 수출기업의 꽌시에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.2009
- 윤진기, "2005년 CIETAC 중재규칙 개정과 중국 중재법상의 문제점 개선", 중재연구, 16(3), pp.91~125 (2006), 한국중재학회
- 윤충원, "중국의 중재법상 중재기관 약정과 관련한 중재합의 유효요건에 관한 사례연구", 무역학회지, 32(3), pp.65~92 (2007), 한국무역학회
- 전대규, "중국민사소송법" (2008), 박영사
- 중국최고인민법원, "섭외중재 및 외국중재와 관련된 몇 가지 문제점들에 대한 인민법원의처리에 관한 통지", ~ (1995)
- 중국최고인민법원, "중재법적용에 관한 몇 가지 문제점에 대한 해석", ~ (2006)
- 차경자, "중국의 섭외 및 외국중재판정 강제집행제도 연구", 중재연구, 15(2), pp.263~292 (2005), 한국중재학회
- 하충룡, "뉴욕협약상 외국중재판정에 대한 미국법원의 해석", 중재연구, 16(2), pp.121~150 (2006), 한국중재학회
- An, Chen, "Is Enforcement of Arbitral Awards An Issue for Consideration and Improvement? - The Case of China in Making the Most of International Investment Agreement: A Common Agenda", 2005 Symposium Co-organized by the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes(ICSID) OECD and United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (2005)
- Chen, Lumming, "Some Reflections on International Commercial Arbitration in China", Journal of International Arbitration, 13(2), pp.121~149 (1996)
- Chi, Manjiao, "Is the Chinese Arbitration Act Truly Arbitration-Friendly: Determining the Validity of Arbitration Agreement under Chinese Law", Asian International Arbitration Journal, 4(1), pp.104~120 (2008)
- Clarke, Donald, "Power and Politics in the Chinese Court System: The Enforcement of Civil Judgement", Columbia Journal of Asian Law, 10, pp.1~92 (1996)
- D'Souza, Fiona, "The Recognition and Enforcement of Commercial Arbitral Awards in the People's Republic of China", Fordham International Law Journal, 30, pp.1318~1359 (2007)
- Fan, Y, "Questioning Guanxi: Definition, Classification and Implications", International Business Review, pp.543~561 (2002)
- Fei, Langfang, "Implementation of the New York Convention in China: A Case Study", Asian International Arbitration Journal, 4(2), pp.123~136 (2008)
- Guvenli, Turgut, "Perception and Management of Legal Issues in China by US Firms", Journal of Socio-Economics, 32, pp.161~181 (2003)
- Hu, Li, "Enforcement of the International Commercial Arbitration in the People's Republic of China", Journal of International Arbitration, 16(4), pp.1~40 (1999)
- Johnson, Graeme, "Bridging the Gap Between Western and Chinese Arbitration Systems", Journal of International Arbitration, 24(6), pp.565~580 (2007)
- Kaufmann-Kohler, "Integrating Mediation into Arbitration: Why It Works in China", Journal of International Arbitration, 25(4), pp.479~492 (2008)
- Lin, Mark, "Supreme People's Court Rules on PRC Arbitration Issues", Journal of International Arbitration, 24(6), pp.597~605 (2007)
- Peerenboom, Randall, "Seek Truth from Facts: An Empirical Study of Enforcement of Arbitral Awards in the PRC", American Journal of Comparative Law, 49, pp.249~327 (2001)
- Peerenboom, Randall, "Enforcement of Arbitral Awards in China", China Business Review, pp.8~12 (2001)
- Reinstein, Ellen, "Finding a Happy Ending for Foreign Investors: The Enforcement of Arbitration Awards in the People's Republic of China", Indian International and Comparative Law Review, 16, pp.37~72 (2005)
- Sanger, Kathryn, "Arbitration in Greater China: Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan", Journal of International Arbitration, 24(6), pp.651~671 (2007)
- Sheehy, Benedict, "Fundamental Conflicting Views of the Rule of the Law in China and the West and Implications for Commercial Disputes", Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business, 26, pp.225~266 (2006)
- Tao, Jingzhou, "Articles 16 and 18 of the PRC Arbitration Law: The Great Wall of China for Foreign Arbitration Institutions", Arbitration International, 23(2), pp.309~326 (2007)
- Thorp, Peter, "The PRC Arbitration Law: Problems and Prospects for Amendment", Journal of International Arbitration, 24(6), pp.607~622 (2007)
- Unkovic Dennis, "Enforcing Arbitration Awards in China", Dispute Resolution Journal, 59(4), pp.68~72 (2005)
- Yu, X, "Urgent Need for Overhaul of Judiciary", pp.10~, South Morning Post
- Yuan Kong, "Revision of China's 1994 Arbitration Act-Some Suggestions from A Judicalization Perspective", Journal of International Arbitration, 22(4), pp.323~330 (2005)
- Yuen Peter, "Arbitration Clauses in a Chinese Context", Journal of International Arbitration, 24(6), pp.581~596 (2007)
- Wang, David, "Judical Reform in China: Improving Arbitration Award Enforcement by Establishing a Federal Court System", Santa Clara Law Review, 48 (2008)
- Wang Wenying, "Distinct Features of Arbitration in China", Journal of International Arbitration, 23(1), pp.581~596 (2006)
- Wing, Carlos, "Lawyers in the People's Republic of China: A Study of Commitment and Professionalization", American Journal of Comparative Law, 53, pp.443~455 (2005)