미국의 중재판정 취소에 관한 연구: 판례법과 제정법의 조화를 중심으로
A Study of Vacating Arbitral Awards in the Harmony of Case Law with Statutory Law of United States
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study is to vindicate the vacation of arbitral awards in the United States. It focuses on the harmony of case law with statutory law of the United States. Until the early twentieth century, the American legal system, having adopted the English common law view, harbored an hostile attitude toward arbitration. The purpose of Federal Arbitration Law(FAA) of United States enacted in 1925 is to eliminate the hostile attitude of courts toward arbitration. The congress is to enforce arbitration agreements into which parties had entered and to place arbitration agreements upon the same footing as other contracts. The structure of vacating grounds of arbitration awards has two layers. One is the vacating grounds originated from statutory origins such as Federal Arbitration Act(FAA) and Uniform Arbitration Act, and the other, the vacating grounds originated from non-statutory, case law background. For a while, the vacatur of case law has co-existed with those of statutory ground for the vacating arbitration awards. After the advent of Hall Street, however, the justification of vacating ground of case law weakens. Post-Hall Street decisions of circuit courts show that there are a couple of routes to deal with manifest disregard of law. One of them is the harmonization of the vacating ground of case law with statutory ground. It seems to be that the manifest disregard of law and public policy exception show the possibility of survival after Hall Street. However, the other non-statutory ground for vacation of arbitration awards have no firm ground for vacating arbitration awards after Hall Street.
Abstract
This study is to vindicate the vacation of arbitral awards in the United States. It focuses on the harmony of case law with statutory law of the United States. Until the early twentieth century, the American legal system, having adopted the English common law view, harbored an hostile attitude toward arbitration. The purpose of Federal Arbitration Law(FAA) of United States enacted in 1925 is to eliminate the hostile attitude of courts toward arbitration. The congress is to enforce arbitration agreements into which parties had entered and to place arbitration agreements upon the same footing as other contracts. The structure of vacating grounds of arbitration awards has two layers. One is the vacating grounds originated from statutory origins such as Federal Arbitration Act(FAA) and Uniform Arbitration Act, and the other, the vacating grounds originated from non-statutory, case law background. For a while, the vacatur of case law has co-existed with those of statutory ground for the vacating arbitration awards. After the advent of Hall Street, however, the justification of vacating ground of case law weakens. Post-Hall Street decisions of circuit courts show that there are a couple of routes to deal with manifest disregard of law. One of them is the harmonization of the vacating ground of case law with statutory ground. It seems to be that the manifest disregard of law and public policy exception show the possibility of survival after Hall Street. However, the other non-statutory ground for vacation of arbitration awards have no firm ground for vacating arbitration awards after Hall Street.
참고문헌 (38)
- 김석호, "경쟁법 위반문제의 중재적격성에 대한 미국 대법원의 입장 - Mitsubishi Motors v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth 사건을 중심으로 -", 법학연구, (37), pp.383~409 (2010), 한국법학회
- 김재원, "미국 法源에의 체계적 접근", 성균관법학, 20(2), pp.673~693 (2008), 법학연구소
- 김진현, "미국의 사법형 ADR제도와 그 함의에 대한 연구", 중재연구, 21(3), pp.55~87 (2011), 한국중재학회
- 목영준, "상사중재법론" (2000), 박영사
- 박원형, "당사자합의에 의한 중재판정의 사법심사 확대에 관한 연구 - 미국판례를 중심으로 -", 상사판례연구, 21(3), pp.335~368 (2008), 한국상사판례학회
- 이준상, "미국에서의 ADR운영현황(법원실무를 중심으로)과 우리나라에서의 활성화 방안", 재판자료, 제107집, 211~274 (2006)
- 이태영, "중재합의의 법적 구조에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.2008
- 정선주, "중재판정의 효력- 확정력을 중심으로 -", 민사소송, 9(2), pp.208~235 (2005), 한국민사소송법학회
- 하충룡, "미국중재에서의 임시처분에 관한 고찰", 중재연구, 19(3), pp.43~66 (2009), 한국중재학회
- Berger, James, E, "The Evolution of Judicial Review Under the Federal Arbitration Act", New York University Journal of Law and Business, 5, pp.745~792 (2009)
- Biesterfeld, Lindsay, "Courts have the Final Say: Does the Doctrine of "Manifest Disregard" Promote Lawful Arbitral Awards Or Disguise Unlawful Judicial Review?”", Journal of Dispute Resolution, pp.627~642 (2006)
- Braun, Matthew E., "The Revised Uniform Arbitration Act", Ohio State Journal of Dispute Resolution, 18, pp.237~248 (2002)
- Burch, Thomas, V., "Manifest Disregard and the Imperfect Procedural Justice of Arbitration", University of Kansas Law Review, 59, pp.47~83 (2010)
- Callahan, Rebecca, "Arbitration v. Litigation: The Right to Appeal and Other Misperception Fuelling the Preference for a Judicial Form", Unpublished Manuscript, pp.35~39 (2006)
- Carrington, Paul, D, "Contract and Jurisdiction", Supreme Court Review, pp.331~402 (1996)
- Drahozal, Christopher, R, "In Defense of Southland: Reexamining the Legislative History of the Federal Arbitration Act", Notre Dame Law Review, 78, pp.101~170 (2002)
- Drahozal, Christopher, R, "Codifying Manifest Disregard", Nevada Law Journal, 8, pp.234~250 (2007)
- Drahozal, Christopher, R, "The Future of Manifest Disregard,” Stockholm International Arbitration Review", Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce, pp.1~12 (2009)
- Gross. Jil, "Hall Street Blues: The Uncertain Future of Manifest Disregard", Securities Regulation Law Journal, 37, pp.232~247 (2009)
- Hayford, Stephen, L., "Law in Disarray: Judicial Standards for Vacatur of Commercial Arbitration Awards", Georgia Law Review, 30, pp.731~739 (1996)
- Hayford, Stephen, L., "Federal Preemption and Vacatur: The Bookened Issues Under the Revised Uniform Arbitration Act", Journal of Dispute Resolution, pp.67~88 (2001)
- Heinsz, Timothy J., "The Uniform Arbitration Act Update: Foreword", Journal of Dispute Resolution, pp.467~ (2002)
- Hermann, Gabriel, "Discovering Policy Under the Federal Arbitration Act", Cornell Law Review, 88, pp.779~813 (2003)
- Hodges Ann, C., "Judicial Review of Arbitration Awards On Public Policy Grounds: Lessons From the Case Law", Ohio State Journal of Dispute Resolution, 16, pp.91~155 (2000)
- LeRoy Michael, H, "Happily Never After: When Final and Binding Arbitration Has No Fairy Tale Ending", Harvard Negotiation and Law Review, 13, pp.167~189 (2008)
- Lindamood, Darren, "Redressing the Arbitration Process: An Alternative to the Arbitration Fairness Act", Wake Forest Law Review, pp.291~318 (2010)
- Mentschikoff, Soia, "Commercial Arbitration", Columbia Law Review, 61, pp.846~869 (1961)
- Mills, Lawrence R, "Vacating Arbitration Awards", Dispute Resolution Magazine, 11(4), pp.23~27 (2005)
- "Uniform Arbitration Act", National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (2000)
- Murphy, Stephen Wills, "Review of Arbitration Awards Under State Law", Virginia Law Review, 96, pp.887~937 (2010)
- Murray, Cynthia, A., "Contractual Expansion of the Scope of Judicial Review of Arbitration Awards Under the Federal Arbitration Act", St. John's Law Review, 76, pp.633~656 (2002)
- Pavetti, Francis, J, "Why the States Should Enact the Revised Uniform Arbitration Act", Pepperdine Dispute Resolution and Law Journal, 3, pp.443~447 (2003)
- Reuben, Richard, C., "Personal Autonomy and Vacatur After Hall Street", Penn State Law Review, 113, pp.1104~1163 (2009)
- Stone, Kathherine Van Wezel, "Rustic Justice: Community and Coercion Under the Federal Arbitration Act", North Carolina Law Review, 77, pp.931~1036 (1999)
- Streeter-Schaefer, Holly, A, "A Look At Court Mandated Civil Mediation", Drake Law Review, 49, pp.367~389 (2001)
- Ware, Stephen, J., "Arbitration Law's Separability Doctrine After Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna", Nevada Law Review, 8, pp.107~134 (2007)
- Weiskopf, Nicholas R, "Hall Street, Judicial Review of Arbitral Awards, and Federal Preemption", Review of Litigation, 29, pp.361~389 (2010)
- Weston, Maureen A., "Preserving the Federal Arbitration Act By Reining in Judicial Expansion and Mandatory Use", Nevada Law Journal, 8, pp.385~399 (2007)