취소된 외국중재판정의 집행가능성에 관한 연구
A Study on the Enforceability of An Annulled Foreign Arbitral Award
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of the New York Convention is to promote arbitration and to facilitate the enforcement of arbitration awards. Although the objectives of the Convention are clear, some of its language is ambiguous. One ambiguity in particular has provoked intense debate. Article V of the Convention prescribes the grounds for denial of recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. Subsection (1)(e) of Article V states that a country may refuse to recognize and enforce an award only on specified grounds. One such ground is annulment of the award by a court of the country in which, or under the law of which, the award was made. Tension exists between Article V(1)(e) and Article VII, which provides that a foreign arbitral award is enforceable to the full extent of the law of the country in which enforcement is sought. The issue is how to reconcile these two provisions. In part II, this paper discusses the effects of the annulment of arbitral awards. Here it will explore the merits and demerits of the territorial and the delocalized approaches, with the conclusion that the delocalized approach should be adopted. In agreement with the delocalized approach,it argues that the country of origin should be divested of its power to annul an award while allowing the country whose law governed the arbitration to retain annulment power. If the parties chose no national law to govern their dispute, no country would have the authority to set aside the award. In part III, it examines the Convention, analyzing its text and legislative history. concluding that the Article VII, being a mandatory provision,should be given priority over the Article V which is a discretionary provision. In part IV, it analyzes the three U.S. decisions that have interpreted Article V(1)(e) and VII of the New York Convention, criticizing their holdings based on the above discussions. In conclusion, this paper proposes that the court of the country in which enforcement is sought be given wider discretion in determining whether a foreign arbitral award which was annulled by another country should be enforced.
Abstract
The purpose of the New York Convention is to promote arbitration and to facilitate the enforcement of arbitration awards. Although the objectives of the Convention are clear, some of its language is ambiguous. One ambiguity in particular has provoked intense debate. Article V of the Convention prescribes the grounds for denial of recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. Subsection (1)(e) of Article V states that a country may refuse to recognize and enforce an award only on specified grounds. One such ground is annulment of the award by a court of the country in which, or under the law of which, the award was made. Tension exists between Article V(1)(e) and Article VII, which provides that a foreign arbitral award is enforceable to the full extent of the law of the country in which enforcement is sought. The issue is how to reconcile these two provisions. In part II, this paper discusses the effects of the annulment of arbitral awards. Here it will explore the merits and demerits of the territorial and the delocalized approaches, with the conclusion that the delocalized approach should be adopted. In agreement with the delocalized approach,it argues that the country of origin should be divested of its power to annul an award while allowing the country whose law governed the arbitration to retain annulment power. If the parties chose no national law to govern their dispute, no country would have the authority to set aside the award. In part III, it examines the Convention, analyzing its text and legislative history. concluding that the Article VII, being a mandatory provision,should be given priority over the Article V which is a discretionary provision. In part IV, it analyzes the three U.S. decisions that have interpreted Article V(1)(e) and VII of the New York Convention, criticizing their holdings based on the above discussions. In conclusion, this paper proposes that the court of the country in which enforcement is sought be given wider discretion in determining whether a foreign arbitral award which was annulled by another country should be enforced.
참고문헌 (21)
- 목영준, "상사중재법론" (2000), 박영사
- 박상조, "국제상사중재법론" (1997), 한올출판사
- 석광현, "국제상사중재법연구, 제1권" (2007), 박영사
- 신창섭, "국제사법" (2007), 세창출판사
- 이기수, "국제거래법, 제4판" (2010), 세창출판사
- Andrew Tweeddale, "Arbitration of Commercial Disputes-International and English Law and Practice" (2005), Oxford Univ. Press
- Albert Jan van den Berg, "When Is Arbitral Award Nondomestic Under the New York Convention of 1958?", Pace L. Rev, 6, pp.25~ (1985)
- Albert Jan van den Berg, "Annulment of Awards” in International Arbitration in International Arbitration in the 21st Century: Towards Judicialization and Uniformity?", ~ (1994)
- Albert Jan van den Berg, "Enforcement of Annulled Awards,” (1998) 9 ICC Ct Bull (No 2, November)", ~ (1998)
- Albert Jan van den Berg, "“The Application of the New York Convention by the Courts,” in Improving the Efficiency of Arbitration Agreements and Awards: 40 Years of Application of the New York Convention", ~ (1999)
- Ray Y. Chan, "The Enforceability of Annulled Foreign Arbitral Awards in the United States: a Critique of Chromalloy", B.U. Int'l L.J., 17, pp.141~ (1999)
- Kenneth R. Davis, "Unconventional Wisdom: A New Look At Articles V and VII of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards", Tex. Int'l L.J., 37, pp.43~ (2002)
- Kenneth Davis, "The Arbitration Clause: Unconscionability in the Securities Industry", B.U. L. Rev., 78, pp.255~ (1998)
- Emmanuel Gaillard, "“Enforcement of Awards Set Aside in the Country of Origin: The French Experience,” in Improving the Efficiency of Arbitration Agreements and Awards: 40 Years of Application of the New York Convention", ~ (1999)
- Giorgion Gaja, "Introduction to International Commercial Arbitration: New York Convention II", ~ (1984)
- Stephen T. Ostrowski, "Note, Chromalloy: United States law and International Arbitration at the Crossroads", N.Y.U. L. Rev.,, 73, pp.1650~ (1998)
- William W. Park, "Duty and Discretion in International Arbitration", Am J. Int'l L., 93, pp.805~ (1999)
- Jan Paulsson, "Arbitration Unbound: Award Detached from the Law of Its Country of Origin", Int'l & Comp. L.Q., 30, pp.358~ (1981)
- Jan Paulsson, "Delocalisation of International Commercial Arbitration: When and Why It Matters", Int'l Comp. L.Q., 32, pp.53~ (1983)
- Jan Paulsson, "Enforcing Arbitral Awards Notwithstanding A Local Standard Annulment (LSA)", ICC Ct Bull, 9(1) (1998)
- Eric A. Schwartz, "A Comment on Chromalloy: Hilmarton, a l'americaine", J. Int'l Arb., 14, pp.125~ (1997)