특허권 중재가능성에 관한 소고
A study on the Possibility of patent arbitration
1
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Judgment on the validity of patents on the subject of an arbitration does not. In other words, the occurrence of patents generated by the administrative action, and such administrative action by an authorized agency may be treated as legitimate until it is canceled. However, recent Supreme Court judgment on novelty and inventive step as well as judgments about the validity of the patent also made possible by the judiciary. This progress even in the mediation of an arbitral award which is premised on the validity of patents can be seen that possible. However, if the arbitration by an arbitrator if possible a certain portion of the limit exists. In other words, the effect of arbitration between the parties is valid. This patent is valid and invalid in arbitration even if the judgment relative to the effect ceases. In addition, the arbitration award and patent invalidation trial is in progress at the same time, if you consequently will reach a different conclusion. This can cause problems of double track. In addition, by extending the critical target recognition and enforcement in other countries can cause problems. Despite these problems, now about the validity of patents that it is possible intervention is necessary to discuss again.
Abstract
Judgment on the validity of patents on the subject of an arbitration does not. In other words, the occurrence of patents generated by the administrative action, and such administrative action by an authorized agency may be treated as legitimate until it is canceled. However, recent Supreme Court judgment on novelty and inventive step as well as judgments about the validity of the patent also made possible by the judiciary. This progress even in the mediation of an arbitral award which is premised on the validity of patents can be seen that possible. However, if the arbitration by an arbitrator if possible a certain portion of the limit exists. In other words, the effect of arbitration between the parties is valid. This patent is valid and invalid in arbitration even if the judgment relative to the effect ceases. In addition, the arbitration award and patent invalidation trial is in progress at the same time, if you consequently will reach a different conclusion. This can cause problems of double track. In addition, by extending the critical target recognition and enforcement in other countries can cause problems. Despite these problems, now about the validity of patents that it is possible intervention is necessary to discuss again.
참고문헌 (27)
- 목영준, "상사중재법론" (2001), 박영사
- 석광현, "국제사법과국제소송 제2권" (2001), 박영사
- 손경환, "신특허법론" (2005), 법영사
- 윤선희, "특허법제4판" (2010), 법문사
- 이태희, "국제계약법-이론과실무" (2001), 법문사
- 최승재, "특허권남용의 경쟁법적 규율" (2010), 세창출판사
- 강수미, "지적재산권분쟁에 있어서 중재의 대상적격", 민사소송, 14(1), pp.127~155 (2010), 한국민사소송법학회
- 김석철, "한국중재의 영역확대 방안에 관한연구", 중재연구, 20(3), pp.47~69 (2010), 한국중재학회
- 박정희, "특허침해소송 등에서 당해 특허의 무효사유에 대하여 심리판단 할 수 있는지 여부", 지식재산21, (91) (2005)
- 박종삼, "중재계약의 법적 효력에 관한 연구*", 중재연구, 19(3), pp.25~42 (2009), 한국중재학회
- 서세원, "중재판정의 기판력에 관한 고찰A Study on the Res Judicata of Arbitral Awards", 중재연구, 17(2), pp.3~21 (2007), 한국중재학회
- 성기문, "공지부분이 포함된 특허 및 의장을 둘러싼 실무상의 제문제", 특허소송연구, 2 (2001), 특허법원
- 안원모, "무효사유가 존재하는 특허권의 행사와 권리남용의 항변", 산업재산권, (27), pp.209~260 (2008), 한국산업재산권법학회
- 오규환, "특허침해소송에 있어서 권리남용의 항변", 김명신변리사화갑기념논문집 (2004), 한국산업재산권법학회
- 윤선희, "일본에서의 지적재산 관련 조정·중재제도", 법조, 53(6), pp.187~209 (2004), 법조협회
- 윤선희, "일본에서 특허의 유효성에 대한 중재가능성-킬비 판결(일본 특허법 제104조의3)을 중심으로-", 중재연구, 21(1), pp.57~72 (2011), 한국중재학회
- 특허분쟁의 중재적합성에 관한 소고, "윤종진", 청주법학, 청주법대학교법학연구소, ~ (1996)
- 이두형, "특허권 침해 관련 법적 공격ㆍ방어수단에 관한 고찰", 사법논집, 43 (2006), 법원도서관
- 이수완, "특허의 무효와 침해", 특허소송연구, 1 (1999), 특허법원
- 이한주, "특허침해소송에 있어 무효사유의 판단", 사법논집, 41 (2005), 법원도서관
- 최성준, "무효사유가 있는 것이 명백한 특허권의 행사가 권리남용에 해당하는지", 지적재산권, (8) (2005), 한국지적재산권법제연구원
- 최성준, "무효사유가 명백한 특허권에 기초한 금지청구등이 권리남용에 해당하는지 여부, In 정보법판례백선(I)" (2006), 박영사
- 최송자, "지적재산권분쟁의 중재적격에 관한 연구-한국과 중국을 중심으로-", 중재연구, 21(2), pp.27~46 (2011), 한국중재학회
- 大友信秀, "侵害訴訟中における特許の有效性判斷(特許法第104條の3)の構造", パテント, 63(2) (2010)
- 牧野利秋, "無効理由が存在することが明らかな特許権に基づく請求と権利の濫用—キルビー事件, In 別冊ジュリスト170号特許判例百選第三版" (2004), 有斐閣
- 〔知的財産権紛争と仲裁③〕知的財産権仲裁活性化のための方向性－米国を参考にして, "城山康文", ~ (2003)
- , 日本特許廳特許制度硏究會제4회硏究會資料, ~