본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

공급망 ESG 관리에서 예상되는 분쟁 중재에 관한 연구 - 포스코와 네이버 사례를 중심으로 -

A Study on Expected Dispute Arbitration in Supply Chain ESG Management: Focusing on the cases of POSCO and NAVER

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류무역학

초록

"ESG management" guides companies to prioritize corporate social responsibility and sustainable development as key management objectives, going beyond mere financial performance pursuits. This approach involves creating a sustainable and robust supply chain by urging companies, acting as 'supply chain managers', to implement ESG management practices alongside their 'supply chain partners'. The domestic business community has been quick to respond to this trend, recognizing that failure to adhere to ESG standards set by organizations such as the EU and SEC could lead to severe repercussions, including exclusion from international trade and reputational damage. POSCO and NAVER, two leading Korean companies, are at the forefront of practicing ESG management effectively. They have both produced and publicly disclosed ESG management reports, showcasing their success in enhancing supply chain ESG management. However, as supply chain managers enforce ESG-related obligations on their suppliers, the likelihood of disputes between the parties may increase. In scenarios where supply chain ESG management leads to conflicts between supply chain managers and suppliers, commercial arbitration emerges as a viable solution for dispute resolution. This method offers several advantages, including the arbitrators' expertise, time and cost efficiency, the binding nature of decisions akin to a court's final judgment, international recognition under the New York Convention, confidentiality, and ample opportunity for parties to be heard. Our analysis focuses on the emerging disputes between supply chain managers and suppliers within the context of supply chain ESG management, particularly examining the cases of POSCO and NAVER. By categorizing the expected types of disputes and assessing the appropriateness of commercial arbitration for their resolution, we highlight the effectiveness of this approach. Furthermore, we propose leveraging the Korean Commercial Arbitration Board's role to enhance the use of arbitration in resolving supply chain ESG disputes, underscoring its potential as a strategic tool for maintaining sustainable and harmonious supply chain relationships.

Abstract

"ESG management" guides companies to prioritize corporate social responsibility and sustainable development as key management objectives, going beyond mere financial performance pursuits. This approach involves creating a sustainable and robust supply chain by urging companies, acting as 'supply chain managers', to implement ESG management practices alongside their 'supply chain partners'. The domestic business community has been quick to respond to this trend, recognizing that failure to adhere to ESG standards set by organizations such as the EU and SEC could lead to severe repercussions, including exclusion from international trade and reputational damage. POSCO and NAVER, two leading Korean companies, are at the forefront of practicing ESG management effectively. They have both produced and publicly disclosed ESG management reports, showcasing their success in enhancing supply chain ESG management. However, as supply chain managers enforce ESG-related obligations on their suppliers, the likelihood of disputes between the parties may increase. In scenarios where supply chain ESG management leads to conflicts between supply chain managers and suppliers, commercial arbitration emerges as a viable solution for dispute resolution. This method offers several advantages, including the arbitrators' expertise, time and cost efficiency, the binding nature of decisions akin to a court's final judgment, international recognition under the New York Convention, confidentiality, and ample opportunity for parties to be heard. Our analysis focuses on the emerging disputes between supply chain managers and suppliers within the context of supply chain ESG management, particularly examining the cases of POSCO and NAVER. By categorizing the expected types of disputes and assessing the appropriateness of commercial arbitration for their resolution, we highlight the effectiveness of this approach. Furthermore, we propose leveraging the Korean Commercial Arbitration Board's role to enhance the use of arbitration in resolving supply chain ESG disputes, underscoring its potential as a strategic tool for maintaining sustainable and harmonious supply chain relationships.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. 강수미, "중재합의 효력의 주관적 범위에 관한 고찰", 중재연구, 33(1) (2023), 한국중재학회
  2. 김인호, "중재가능성의 합리적 경계획정을 통한 국제중재의 증진", 비교사법, 23(3) (2016), 한국사법학회
  3. 김현정, "탄소국경조정제도의 역내 외 논란 및 법적 정합성", 국제정치연구, 26(2) (2023), 동아시아국제정치학회
  4. 도혜정, "중재절차 중 ‘화해의 유도’와 ‘조정-중재'제도의 구분 필요성에 대한 연구", 중재연구, 30(4) (2020), 한국중재학회
  5. 소병천, "EU 탄소국경조정제도와 우리나라에의 시사점", 아주법학, 15(3) (2021), 아주대학교 법학연구소
  6. 안건형, "기업책임경영(RBC)을 위한 ESG 분쟁의 중재 활용에 관한 연구", 국제거래법연구, 31(1) (2022), 국제거래법학회
  7. 이선미, "기업의 ESG 활동이 기업평판에 미치는 영향 : 신뢰의 매개효과를 중심으로", 경영컨설팅연구, 22(1) (2022), 한국경영컨설팅학회
  8. 장윤제, "ESG 위험관리 관점 공급망 실사 및 컴플라이언스를 통한 무역 활성화 방안", 무역구제연구, (68) (2023), 무역구제학회
  9. 장혜진, "ESG환경에서의 공급망 실사법", 환경법연구, 45(1) (2023), 한국환경법학회
  10. 태기정, "신의칙 위반의 효과", 동북아법연구, 13(1) (2019), 전북대학교 동북아법연구소
  11. 허해관, "국제상사중재에서 실체의 주관적 준거법", 중재연구, 33(2) (2023), 한국중재학회
  12. 2022 NAVER 지속가능경영보고서, "네이버", ~ (2022)
  13. 대한상사중재원, "중재를 통한 분쟁해결 안내", ~ (2022)
  14. 대법원, "2023 사법연감" (2023)
  15. 중재활성화를 위한 법원의 역할, "사법정책연구원", ~ (2018)
  16. 2022 POSCO 기업시민보고서, "포스코", ~ (2022)
  17. "대법원 1995. 10. 12. 선고 94다16786 판결", ~
  18. "대법원 1996. 1. 26. 선고 94다5472 판결", ~
  19. "대법원 1998. 10. 27. 선고 97다47989 판결", ~
  20. "대법원 1999. 12. 24. 선고 99다44588 판결", ~
  21. "대법원 2002. 5. 24. 선고 2000다72572 판결", ~
  22. "대법원 2002. 9. 4. 선고 2001다1386 판결", ~
  23. "대법원 2017. 10. 12., 선고, 2016다9643, 판결", ~
  24. "대법원 2018. 11. 29. 선고 2014다233480 판결", ~
  25. "대법원 2022. 9. 7. 선고 2022다237098 판결", ~
  26. Supply chain disputes, International Arbitration Report, "C. Mark Baker", Norton Rose Fulbright, ~ (2021)
  27. ICC Arbitration and ADR Commission Report on Resolving Climate Change Related Disputes through Arbitration and ADR, "International Chamber of Commerce", ~ (2019)
  28. "Lieferkettensorgfaltspflichtengesetz(LkSG)", ~
  29. "United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards", ~
  30. "ESG 공시 놓고 회계법인·로펌 티격태격" (2023)[URL]
  31. "EU 공급망 실사법 ‘독일 반대’에 좌초 위기, 한국 건설업계 ESG 향방 촉각" (2024)[URL]
  32. "공급망 ESG에 대한 기업인식 및 협력현황 조사" (2021)[URL]
  33. "商議, 공급망 내 중소·중견 협력사 ESG 진단·컨설팅 나선다" (2023)[URL]
  34. "중재인 현황" (2023), 대한상사중재원[URL]
  35. "미 SEC, 기후공시 의무화 규정 확정...스코프3 배출량 제외" (2024)[URL]
  36. "ESG는 리스크 아닌 경쟁력 키울 기회" (2021)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)