본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

열유실층이 있는 오일샌드 저류층에서 eMSAGP공법의 비응축가스 주입시점 분석

Analysis of Non-condensable Gas Injection Timing in eMSAGP Method for Oil Sands Reservoir with Thief Zone

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류자원공학

초록

본 연구에서는 eMSAGP(enhanced modified steam and gas push)공법의 NCG(non-condensable gas) 주입시점을 열유실문제 발생 전·후로 나누어 선정하였다. NCG는 스팀챔버 형태를 유지하여 열유실문제를 개선하면서도 스팀챔버 성장을 방해해 누적오일생산량을 감소시킨다. 따라서, 어떤 생산성능을 우선순위에 두는지에 따라 적합한 NCG 주입시점을 선정하는 것이 eMSAGP공법의 핵심이다. 본 연구에서는 주입시점을 SAGD(steam-assisted gravity drainage)공법과 SAGP공법의cSOR(cumulative steam-oil ratio) 차함수의 기울기를 기준으로 결정하였다. 연구 결과, 열유실문제발생 전 NCG 주입은 SAGP공법 대비 cSOR을 1.85% 감소시켜 열유실문제 관점에서 효과적이다. 반면, 발생 후 NCG 주입은 SAGP공법 대비 누적오일생산량을 36%(SAGD 대비 1.7%만 감소) 증가시켜 누적오일생산량 관점에서 효과적이다.

Abstract

In this study, the injection time of non-condensable gas (NCG) in the enhanced modified steam and gas push (eMSAGP) method is tested before and after heat loss occurs. Although NCG helps maintain the shape of the steam chamber mitigating heat loss, it hinders the growth of the steam chamber reducing cumulative oil production. Therefore, determining the NCG timing is crucial in the eMSAGP method. In this study, the injection time is determined based on changes in the gradient of the cumulative steam-oil ratio (cSOR) between steam-assisted gravity drainage and steam and gas push (SAGP). NCG injection before heat loss occurs is beneficial to the cSOR, as it reduces the cSOR by 1.85% compared with the case of SAGP. By contrast, NCG injection after heat loss occurs is effective in enhancing the cumulative oil production, as it increases the cumulative oil production by 36% compared with the case of SAGP.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. "Alberta Energy Regulator" (2024)[URL]
  2. Austin-Adigio, M., "Non-condensable gas co-injection with steam for oil sands recovery", Energy, 179, pp.736~746 (2019)
  3. Statistical Review of World Energy 2021, "BP", 72~ (2021)
  4. Butler, R. M., "The gravity drainage of steam-heated heavy oil to parallel horizontal wells", Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 20(2), pp.90~96 (1981)
  5. Butler, R. M., "The steam and gas push (SAGP)", Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 38(3), pp.54~61 (1999)
  6. Butler, R. M., "Steam and gas push (SAGP)-3;Recent theoretical developments and laboratory results", Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 39(8), pp.51~60 (2000)
  7. Canbolat, S., "Assessment of SAGD heat transfer mechanism via noncondensable gas co-injection", Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 195, pp.107936~ (2020)
  8. Choi, Y., "Improvement of SAGD by N2 injection in oil sand reservoir with thief zone", Journal of the Korean Society of Mineral and Energy Resources Engineers, 50(2), pp.252~263 (2013)
  9. Chung, S., "Optimisation of steam and gas push to prevent water influx from a top-water-bearing area into a vapour chamber", International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Technology, 20(3), pp.304~326 (2019)
  10. Chung, S., "Sensitivity analysis on steam and gas push to reduce heat loss in to the top waterbearing area overlaying oil sands", International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers (2013), ISOPE
  11. Computer Modelling Group(CMG), "STARS User Guide Version 2024.10", CMG, ~ (2024)
  12. Non-Condensable Gas Co-Injection for Thief Zone Mitigation Non-Confidential Final Report, "ConocoPhillips", 16~, pp.F0160255 (2020)
  13. National Inventory Report 1990-2021: Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Canada Part 1, "Environment and Climate Change Canada(ECCC)", 250~, pp.No. EC21275.02 (2023)
  14. Green, K. P., "How Alberta’s Carbon Emission Cap will Reduce Oil Sands Growth", Fraser Research Bulletin, Canada, pp.17~ (2016)
  15. Kang, X., "Optimization of the SAGP process in L oil-sand field with response surface methodology", Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference (2019)
  16. Kim, S., "A review of design factors in steam and gas push for eco-friendly oil sands production and its field application in Canada", Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology (2024)
  17. Lee, C., "Flow characteristics of steam and gas push in the presence of heat thief zones overlying oil sands deposits", Applied Sciences, 7(9), pp.919~ (2017)
  18. Liang, G., "Realistic and promising technology measures for SAGD projects at low oil price", SPE Trinidad and Tobago Section Energy Resources Conference (2018), SPE
  19. Second Quarter 2017 Report to Shareholders for the Period Ended, "MEG Energy", MEG Energy, 60~ (2017)
  20. "NumPy" (2024)[URL]
  21. Facts About Alberta’s Oil Sands and Its Industry, "Oil Sands Discovery Centre", 52~, pp.No.7617576 (2016)
  22. Unconventional Resources Development, "Shin, H.", CIR, 38~42 (2015)
  23. Sleep, S., "Improving robustness of LCA results through stakeholder engagement: A case study of emerging oil sands technologies", Journal of Cleaner Production, 281, pp.125277~ (2021)
  24. Wang, J. Y., "Energy (Heat)distribution and transformation in the SAGP process", SPE Heavy Oil Conference Canada (2012), SPE
  25. Xu, J., "Effects of Lean Zones on SAGD Performance", MS, pp.2015
  26. Yee, C. T., "Modified Steam and Gas Push with Additional Horizontal Production Wells to Enhance Heavy Oil", Bitumen Recovery Process, CA, 2014
  27. Zhang, S., "Experimental study on the process of eMSAGP", Petroleum & Petrochemical Engineering Journal, 5(1), pp.000255~ (2021)
  28. Zhibo, L., "Production features of steam and gas push: Comparative analysis with steam assisted gravity drainage", Petroleum Exploration and Development, 38(1), pp.79~83 (2011)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)