본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

오일샌드 저류층 두께와 수직투과도를 고려한 SAGD 유정 간격 및 배열 최적화

Optimization of Well-Pair Spacing and Well Configuration for the SAGD Process in the Oilsands Reservoirs

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류자원공학

초록

증기중력배유법(steam-assisted gravity drainage, SAGD)의 경제성은 저류층 물성 외에도 유정 간격에 영향을 받는다. 경험적으로 저류층이 두꺼울수록 SAGD 유정 간격을 넓혀 시추하지만, 저류층 물성을 고려한 정량적인 유정 쌍 간 시추 간격 결정 방법이 필요하다. 본 연구에서는 캐나다 아사바스카 지역 오일샌드 저류층의 대표 물성을 활용하여 유정 간격 최적화 방법을 개발하고, 근간격시추법과 추가회수 시추법 간 경제성을 비교한다. 이를 위해 수직투과도 및 저류층 두께에 대한 민감도 분석을 수행하여 경제적인 SAGD 운영이 가능한 저류층 물성 조건을 도출하고 상관관계 분석을 통해 유정 간격을 최적화하였다. 그 결과, 수직투과도가 500 mD일 때 최적의 유정 간격은 저류층 두께를 5배 후 50 m만큼 차감한 거리이며, 수직투과도가 1,500 mD, 2,500 mD일 때는 저류층 두께의 5배임을 밝혔다. 또한, 시추공 배열 방법 별 경제성 비교 시 최적의 유정 간격으로 추가회수 시추법을 적용하는 것이 경제성이 가장 높았다.

Abstract

The performance of steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) is influenced not only by reservoir properties, but also by well-pair spacing. Field operators empirically increase the well-pair spacing for thicker reservoirs. However, a quantitative method is needed to determine the well-pair spacing based on reservoir properties. This study accordingly developed an optimization method for well-pair spacing using the properties of representative oil sands reservoir in Athabasca, Canada. In addition, the economic feasibilities of narrow-spacing and infill well-drilling methods were compared. A sensitivity analysis of vertical permeability and reservoir thickness was conducted to identify reservoir conditions under which SAGD operations are economically viable. The results revealed that the optimal well-pair spacing was the reservoir thickness multiplied by five, subtracting 50 m when the vertical permeability was 500 mD, and five times the reservoir thickness for vertical permeabilities of 1,500 mD and 2,500 mD. The infill well-drilling method with the optimized well-pair spacing showed the highest performance among the well configurations considered.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. Anderson, M. T., "SAGD Startup:Leaving the heat in the reservoir", SPE Heavy Oil Conference Canada (2012), SPE
  2. Arthur, J. E., "US, Patent No. 7556099B2, 20070295499. CA, Patent No. 2591498A1, 2591498C", ~ (2009)
  3. Butler, R. M., "Theoretical studies on the gravity drainage of heavy oil during in‐situ steam heating", The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 59(4), pp.455~460 (1981)
  4. 2011 Foster Creek In-situ Performance Report, "Cenovus Energy Inc.", ~ (2012)
  5. 2020 Christina Lake In-situ Performance Report, "Cenovus Energy Inc.", ~ (2021)
  6. Computer Modelling Group, "STARS User Guide (2012.10)", Computer Modelling Group Ltd, ~ (2012)
  7. 2011 Great Divide In-situ Performance Report, "Connacher", ~ (2012)
  8. Irani, M., "Modeling the conformance improvement using flow control devices in infill wells adjacent to sagd well pairs: no flashing", SPE Journal, 25(2), pp.800~819 (2020)
  9. Jimenez, J., "The field performance of SAGD projects in Canada", International Petroleum Technology Conference (2008), IPTC
  10. Kim, M., "Development and application of proxy models for predicting the shale barrier size using reservoir parameters and SAGD production data", Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 170, pp.331~344 (2018)
  11. Miller, K. A., "Improving the performance of classic SAGD with offsetting vertical producers", Canadian International Petroleum Conference (2007), Petroleum Society
  12. Shin, H., "A reservoir economic indicator to evaluate a SAGD project", Canadian International Petroleum Conference (2008), Petroleum Society
  13. Shin, H., "Simple thermal efficiency parameter as an economic indicator for SAGD performance", SPE Hydrocarbon Economics and Evaluation Symposium (2005), SPE
  14. Shin, H., "New economic indicator to evaluate SAGD performance", SPE Western Regional Meeting (2005), SPE
  15. Shin, H., "Fast-SAGD application in the alberta oil sands areas", Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 45(9), pp.46~53 (2006)
  16. Shin, H., "Review of reservoir parameters to optimize SAGD and Fast-SAGD operating conditions", Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 46(1), pp.35~41 (2007)
  17. Shin, H., "Optimal grid system design for SAGD simulation", SPE Heavy Oil Conference Canada (2012), SPE
  18. 2022 Firebag In-situ Performance Report, "Suncor", 49~ (2023)
  19. Verney, M. J., "Evaluating SAGD performance due to changes in well spacing and length", SPE Canada Heavy Oil Technical Conference (2015), SPE
  20. Zargar, Z., "How to space SAGD well pairs for optimal performance", SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition (2021), SPE

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)