본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Classification and consideration for the risk management in the planning phase of NPP decommissioning project

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류원자력공학

초록

The decommissioning project of a nuclear facility is a large-scale process that is expected to take about 15 years or longer. The range of risks to be considered is large and complex, then, it is expected that various risks will arise in decision-making by area during the project. Therefore, in this study, the risk family derived from the Decommissioning Risk Management (DRiMa) project was reconstructed into a decommissioning project risk profile suitable for the Kori Unit 1. Two criteria of uncertainty and importance are considered in order to prioritize the selected 26 risks of decommissioning project. The uncertainty is scored according to the relevant laws and decommissioning plan preparation guidelines, and the project importance is scored according to the degree to which it primarily affects the triple constraints of the project. The results of risks are divided into high, medium, and low. Among them, 10 risks are identified as medium level and 16 risks are identified as low level. 10 risks, which are medium levels, are classified in five categories: End state of decommissioning project, Management of waste and materials, Decommissioning strategy and technology, Legal and regulatory framework, and Safety. This study is a preliminary assessment of the risk of the decommissioning project that could be considered in the preparation stage. Therefore, we expect that the project risks considered in this study can be used as an initial data for reevaluation by reflecting the detail project progress in future studies.

Abstract

The decommissioning project of a nuclear facility is a large-scale process that is expected to take about 15 years or longer. The range of risks to be considered is large and complex, then, it is expected that various risks will arise in decision-making by area during the project. Therefore, in this study, the risk family derived from the Decommissioning Risk Management (DRiMa) project was reconstructed into a decommissioning project risk profile suitable for the Kori Unit 1. Two criteria of uncertainty and importance are considered in order to prioritize the selected 26 risks of decommissioning project. The uncertainty is scored according to the relevant laws and decommissioning plan preparation guidelines, and the project importance is scored according to the degree to which it primarily affects the triple constraints of the project. The results of risks are divided into high, medium, and low. Among them, 10 risks are identified as medium level and 16 risks are identified as low level. 10 risks, which are medium levels, are classified in five categories: End state of decommissioning project, Management of waste and materials, Decommissioning strategy and technology, Legal and regulatory framework, and Safety. This study is a preliminary assessment of the risk of the decommissioning project that could be considered in the preparation stage. Therefore, we expect that the project risks considered in this study can be used as an initial data for reevaluation by reflecting the detail project progress in future studies.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. "Nuclear Safety Act", ~ (2021)
  2. "Open nuclear power plant operation information"[URL]
  3. 2020 Initial Feasibility Study Report: Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Core Technology Development Project, "KISTEP", Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning, ~ (2021)
  4. H. Yoon, "A Search for a Legal Regime for Nuclear Decommissioning in Korea -in Consideration of Fostering a Nuclear Decommissioning Industry", ~ (2020)
  5. Management of Project Risks in Decommissioning, "IAEA", International Atomic Energy Agency, ~, pp.SRS No.97 (2019)
  6. PMBOK Guide, "PMI", Project Management Institute, ~ (2017)
  7. Decommissioning of Facilities, "IAEA", International Atomic Energy Agency, ~ (2014)
  8. T. Raz, "Risk Management, Project Success, and Technological Uncertainty", ~ (2002)
  9. "Enforcement Rule of the Nuclear Safety Act", ~ (2021)
  10. NSSC, "Standard Format and Content of the Decommissioning Plan for Nuclear Facilities", Notices of the Nuclear Safety and Security Commission, ~ (2021)
  11. Regulation on the Methods of Verifying and Inspecting the Decommissioning Status of Nuclear Facilities, "NSSC", Nuclear Safety and Security Commission, ~, pp.Notice of NSSC No. 2021-12 (2021)
  12. Standards for the Re-use of Site and Remaining Buildings after the Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities, "NSSC", Notices of the Nuclear Safety and Security Commission, ~, pp.No. 2021-11 (2021)
  13. Safety Review Guideline on Final Decommissioning Plan for Decommissioning Approval, "KINS", Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety, ~, pp.KINS (2020), GEG002
  14. Environmental Strategies for Site Reuse of Decommissioned Nuclear Power Plants, "KEI", Korea Environment Institute, ~ (2019)
  15. 2021 Implementation Plan for Low and Intermediate Level Radioactive Waste, "KORAD", Korea Radioactive Waste Agency, ~ (2021)
  16. T. Oritz, "Radiological protection during the dismantling of nuclear facilities", 13th International Congress of the International Radiation Protection Association (2012)
  17. Decommissioning of Facilities, "IAEA", International Atomic Energy Agency, ~ (2014)
  18. G. Jeong, "Quantitative assessment model of nuclear facility decommissioning process", Korean Radioactive Waste Society Conference (2011)
  19. Management of Nuclear Power Plant Projects, "IAEA", International Atomic Energy Agency, ~, pp.NG-T-1.6 (2020)

관련 논문AI추천

Review of the cost estimation in nuclear power plant decommissioning and proposal of the cost estimation methodology for kori unit 1박찬근, 서형우한국원자력학회 · Nuclear Engineering and Technology2025 · 제57권 제6호Analysis of Korean Safety Evaluation Criteria for Dismantling Nuclear Power Plants Using the IAEA Guidance for Safety Assessment공태영, 김성준, 김화평, 김희근, 손진호, 송창순, 최우석(사)한국방사선산업학회 · 방사선산업학회지2022 · 제16권 제3호Comparison of the DeSa Project and the Preliminary Decommissioning Plan for Shin-Kori Units 5 and 6 in Terms of Graded Approaches공태영, 김성준, 김지웅, 김화평, 김희근, 손진호, 송창주, 최우석(사)한국방사선산업학회 · 방사선산업학회지2023 · 제17권 제2호국외 원자력발전소 해체 안전성 평가 방법론 분석김광표, 손건우, 이정우, 한창희(사)한국방사선산업학회 · 방사선산업학회지2024 · 제18권 제4호원전 차폐 콘크리트 구조물 제염해체공사 리스크 분류체계 구축: 구조적 / 작업 리스크를 중심으로김별, 안용한, 이주성한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 · 한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 논문집2018 · 제22권 제3호국내 원전 방사화 콘크리트 구조물 해체공사 리스크 분류체계 구축 - 구조적·인적 리스크를 중심으로 -권나현, 문효수, 안용한, 이상렬, 조한광, 최중식한국퍼실리티매니지먼트학회 · 한국퍼실리티매니지먼트학회지2021 · 제16권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (39건)