본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Comparison of the DeSa Project and the Preliminary Decommissioning Plan for Shin-Kori Units 5 and 6 in Terms of Graded Approaches

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

A graded approach applies safety requirements differentially, depending on the risk potential. An advantage of applying a graded approach is that safety assessments can be conducted repeatedly byfocusing on areas with relatively higher risk than on those with low risk when decommissioning a nuclearpower plant (NPP). The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) recommends applying a gradedapproach to decommissioning NPPs worldwide. In Korea, the definition of the graded approach requiresto be clarified. This study compared the decommissioning method used in Korean NPPs with the IAEAgraded approach and examined whether the graded approach can be applied to decommissioning NPPsin Korea. As a result of the comparison, the preliminary decommissioning plan for Shin-Kori Units 5 and6 showed that the decommissioning method for Korean NPPs is similar to the five-step IAEA gradedapproach.

Abstract

A graded approach applies safety requirements differentially, depending on the risk potential. An advantage of applying a graded approach is that safety assessments can be conducted repeatedly byfocusing on areas with relatively higher risk than on those with low risk when decommissioning a nuclearpower plant (NPP). The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) recommends applying a gradedapproach to decommissioning NPPs worldwide. In Korea, the definition of the graded approach requiresto be clarified. This study compared the decommissioning method used in Korean NPPs with the IAEAgraded approach and examined whether the graded approach can be applied to decommissioning NPPsin Korea. As a result of the comparison, the preliminary decommissioning plan for Shin-Kori Units 5 and6 showed that the decommissioning method for Korean NPPs is similar to the five-step IAEA gradedapproach.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. "Nuclear Power Plant Status" (2022)[URL]
  2. Lee EJ, "Comparative analysis of occupational radiation doses when decommissioning nuclear power plants", Energy Sci. Eng, 10(12), pp.4358~4365 (2022)[DOI]
  3. Son JH, "Estimation of radiation dose resulting from the recycling of large metal wastes from decommissioning nuclear power plants in Korea", Energy Sci. Eng, 9(12), pp.2206~2214 (2021)[DOI]
  4. Safety Assessment for Decommissioning, Annex II Graded Approach to Safety Assessments for Decommissioning of Facilities Using Radioactive Material, "International Atomic Energy Agency", IAEA, ~, pp.Safety Reports Series No.77 (2013)
  5. Safety Assessment for Decommissioning Facilities Using Radioactive Material, "International Atomic Energy Agency", IAEA, ~, pp.Safety Standards Series No. WS-G-5.2 (2008)
  6. 김화평, "Analysis of Korean Safety Evaluation Criteria for Dismantling Nuclear Power Plants Using the IAEA Guidance for Safety Assessment", 방사선산업학회지, 16(3), pp.191~199 (2022), (사)한국방사선산업학회[DOI]
  7. Annual Report of Occupational Exposure in Nuclear Power Plants in 2021, "Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power", KHNP, ~ (2021)
  8. "(Other reporting)Overview of the preliminary decommissioning plan and main characteristics of the decommissioning of nuclear power plants in Korea" (2022)[URL]
  9. Safety Assessment for Decommissioning, Annex I, Part A, Safety Assessment for Decommissioning of a Nuclear Power Plant, "International Atomic Energy Agency", IAEA, ~, pp.Safety Reports Series No.77 (2013)
  10. Republic of Korea, "Enforcement Decree of Nuclear Safety Act", Presidential Decree No. 31431, ~ (2021)
  11. "Shin-Kori Nuclear Power Units 5 and 6 Preliminary Decommissioning Plan" (2017)[URL]
  12. "Shin-Kori Units 5 and 6 Preliminary Safety Analysis Report" (2016)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)