Use of a New Knee Prosthesis as an Articulating Spacer in Two-Stage Revision of Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
purpose: To report our experience with two-stage revision using a new femoral component (NFC) spacer (Depuy Synthes) as an articulating spacer. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, we reviewed 22 two-stage revisions that were performed using an NFC spacer in 22 patients suspected of having an infected total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from December 2010 to March 2013. The result was considered successful when eradication of infection was achieved using only one NFC spacer.results: The average time from primary TKA to the first stage procedure was 29.1 months and the average time from the first stage procedure until the final second stage procedure was 12.7 weeks. The average range of motion increased from 82o preoperatively to 104o postoperatively. The American Knee Society Knee score increased from 29.3 points to 66 points. The Function score increased from 29.5 points to 64 points. Four cases were reinfected after two-stage revision. The mean follow-up was 37.6 months. conclusions: The new articulating spacer showed promising short-term results both with regard to eradication of infection and functional improvement.
Abstract
purpose: To report our experience with two-stage revision using a new femoral component (NFC) spacer (Depuy Synthes) as an articulating spacer. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, we reviewed 22 two-stage revisions that were performed using an NFC spacer in 22 patients suspected of having an infected total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from December 2010 to March 2013. The result was considered successful when eradication of infection was achieved using only one NFC spacer.results: The average time from primary TKA to the first stage procedure was 29.1 months and the average time from the first stage procedure until the final second stage procedure was 12.7 weeks. The average range of motion increased from 82o preoperatively to 104o postoperatively. The American Knee Society Knee score increased from 29.3 points to 66 points. The Function score increased from 29.5 points to 64 points. Four cases were reinfected after two-stage revision. The mean follow-up was 37.6 months. conclusions: The new articulating spacer showed promising short-term results both with regard to eradication of infection and functional improvement.
참고문헌 (19)
- Blom AW, "Infection after total knee arthroplasty", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 86, pp.688~691 (2004)
- Willis-Owen CA, "Factors affecting the incidence of infection in hip and knee replacement : ananalysis of 5277 cases", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 92, pp.1128~1133 (2010)
- Park SJ, "Comparison of static and mobile antibiotic-impregnated cement spacers for the treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty", Int Orthop, 34, pp.1181~1186 (2010)
- Antonio Silvestre, "Revision of Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty: Two-Stage Reimplantation Using an Antibiotic-Impregnated Static Spacer", Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery, 5(3), pp.180~187 (2013), 대한정형외과학회
- Calton TF, "Bone loss associated with the use of spacer blocks in infected total knee arthroplasty", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (345), pp.148~154 (1997)
- Fehring TK, "Articulating versus static spacers in revision total knee arthroplasty for sepsis: the Ranawat Award", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (380), pp.9~16 (2000)
- Hsu YC, "Antibiotic-loaded cement articulating spacer for 2-stage reimplantation in infected total knee arthroplasty : a simple and economic method", J Arthroplasty, 22, pp.1060~1066 (2007)
- Emerson RH Jr, "Comparison of a static with a mobile spacer in total knee infection", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (404), pp.132~138 (2002)
- Freeman MG, "Functional advantage of articulating versus static spacers in 2-stage revision for total knee arthroplasty infection", J Arthroplasty, 22, pp.1116~1121 (2007)
- Pitto RP, "Pre-formed articulating knee spacer in two-stage revision for the infected total knee arthroplasty", Int Orthop, 29, pp.305~308 (2005)
- Kalore NV, "Is there a preferred articulating spacer technique for infected knee arthroplasty? A preliminary study", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 470, pp.228~235 (2012)
- Kamme C, "Aerobic and anaerobic bacteria in deep infections after total hip arthroplasty: differential diagnosis between infectious and non-infectious loosening", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (154), pp.201~207 (1981)
- Parvizi J, "New definition for periprosthetic joint infection : from the Workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 469, pp.2992~2994 (2011)
- Scott IR, "Exchange arthroplasty for infected knee replacements : a new two-stage method", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 75, pp.28~31 (1993)
- Trezies A, "The use of an articulating spacer in the management of infected total knee arthroplasties", J Arthroplasty, 21, pp.702~704 (2006)
- Brunnekreef J, "Recovery of knee mobility after a static or mobile spacer in total knee infection", Acta Orthop Belg, 79, pp.83~89 (2013)
- Anderson JA, "An articulating spacer to treat and mobilize patients with infected total knee arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 24, pp.631~635 (2009)
- 김영수, "Two-Stage Revision Using a Modified Articulating Spacer in Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty", Knee Surgery and Related Research, 25(4), pp.180~185 (2013), 대한슬관절학회
- Pitto RP, "Antibiotic-loaded bone cement spacers in two-stage management of infected total knee arthroplasty", Int Orthop, 28, pp.129~133 (2004)