Efficacy of Open Debridement and Polyethylene Exchange in Strictly Selected Patients with Infection after Total Knee Arthroplasty
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: To assess the efficacy of open debridement and polyethylene exchange (ODPE) combined with proper antibiotic therapy in strictly selected patients with infection after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and analyze factors associated with treatment failure.Materials and Methods: From January 2010 to January 2014, 25 cases that underwent ODPE under the diagnosis of infection within four weeks after TKA or acute hematogenous infection within five days of symptom onset were reviewed in this study. Results: Treatment was successful in 22 out of 25 cases (88.0%). Factors associated with failure were accompanying infection (periprosthetic infection in the ipsilateral foot, cervical parotid abscess, and masticator space abscess) and diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) before TKA. Resistant bacteria did not entail a risk. On clinical results, the mean postoperative Lysholm score and Korean Knee score were 81.4 and 79.4, respectively, the knee range of motion was 115.4°±12.9°, and duration of hospitalization was 32.3±8.4 days. On radiographic results, 3.47±1.56 mm joint line elevation and a valgus change of 0.61°±2.35° in knee alignment were observed.Conclusions: ODPE combined with appropriate antibiotics therapy could be a useful treatment method for infection after TKA if the procedure is performed within a symptom duration of five days or less in the absence of accompanying infection in patients whose indication for TKA was not RA.
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the efficacy of open debridement and polyethylene exchange (ODPE) combined with proper antibiotic therapy in strictly selected patients with infection after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and analyze factors associated with treatment failure.Materials and Methods: From January 2010 to January 2014, 25 cases that underwent ODPE under the diagnosis of infection within four weeks after TKA or acute hematogenous infection within five days of symptom onset were reviewed in this study. Results: Treatment was successful in 22 out of 25 cases (88.0%). Factors associated with failure were accompanying infection (periprosthetic infection in the ipsilateral foot, cervical parotid abscess, and masticator space abscess) and diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) before TKA. Resistant bacteria did not entail a risk. On clinical results, the mean postoperative Lysholm score and Korean Knee score were 81.4 and 79.4, respectively, the knee range of motion was 115.4°±12.9°, and duration of hospitalization was 32.3±8.4 days. On radiographic results, 3.47±1.56 mm joint line elevation and a valgus change of 0.61°±2.35° in knee alignment were observed.Conclusions: ODPE combined with appropriate antibiotics therapy could be a useful treatment method for infection after TKA if the procedure is performed within a symptom duration of five days or less in the absence of accompanying infection in patients whose indication for TKA was not RA.
참고문헌 (30)
- Kurtz SM, "Infection burden for hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States", J Arthroplasty, 23, pp.984~991 (2008)
- Peersman G, "Infection in total knee replacement: a retrospective review of 6489 total knee replacements", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (392), pp.15~23 (2001)
- Tsukayama DT, "Diagnosis and management of infection after total knee arthroplasty", J Bone Joint Surg Am, (85 Suppl 1), pp.S75~S80 (2003)
- Lizaur-Utrilla A, "Debridement with prosthesis retention and antibiotherapy vs. two-stage revision for periprosthetic knee infection within 3 months after arthroplasty: a case-control study", Clin Microbiol Infect, 21, pp.851~ (2015)
- Gardner J, "Can this prosthesis be saved? : implant salvage attempts in infected primary TKA", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 469, pp.970~976 (2011)
- Cobo J, "Early prosthetic joint infection : outcomes with debridement and implant retention followed by antibiotic therapy", Clin Microbiol Infect, 17, pp.1632~1637 (2011)
- Holmberg A, "75% success rate after open debridement, exchange of tibial insert, and antibiotics in knee prosthetic joint infections", Acta Orthop, 86, pp.457~462 (2015)
- Koh IJ, "Open debridement and prosthesis retention is a viable treatment option for acute periprosthetic joint infection after total knee arthroplasty", Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 135, pp.847~855 (2015)
- Schoifet SD, "Treatment of infection after total knee arthroplasty by debridement with retention of the components", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 72, pp.1383~1390 (1990)
- Deirmengian C, "Limited success with open debridement and retention of components in the treatment of acute Staphylococcus aureus infections after total knee arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 18(7 Suppl 1), pp.22~26 (2003)
- Mont MA, "Multiple irrigation, debridement, and retention of components in infected total knee arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 12, pp.426~433 (1997)
- Parvizi J, "New definition for periprosthetic joint infection : from the Workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 469, pp.2992~2994 (2011)
- Classen T, "Modification of the method of Figgie for determination of joint line shifting in total knee arthroplasty", Radiologe, 49, pp.533~537 (2009)
- Jamsen E, "Outcome of prosthesis exchange for infected knee arthroplasty : the effect of treatment approach", Acta Orthop, 80, pp.67~77 (2009)
- Volin SJ, "Two-stage reimplantation of total joint infections: a comparison of resistant and non-resistant organisms", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (427), pp.94~100 (2004)
- Masters JP, "A systematic review of the evidence for single stage and two stage revision of infected knee replacement", BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 14, pp.222~ (2013)
- Hart WJ, "Two-stage revision of infected total knee replacements using articulating cement spacers and short-term antibiotic therapy", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 88, pp.1011~1015 (2006)
- Oduwole KO, "Increasing financial burden of revision total knee arthroplasty", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 18, pp.945~948 (2010)
- Buret A, "An in vivo model to study the pathobiology of infectious biofilms on biomaterial surfaces", J Biomed Mater Res, 25, pp.865~874 (1991)
- Bandyk DF, "Treatment of bacteria-biofilm graft infection by in situ replacement in normal and immune-deficient states", J Vasc Surg, 18, pp.398~405 (1993)
- Gallo J, "Pathogenesis of prosthesis-related infection", Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub, 147, pp.27~35 (2003)
- Jorgensen NP, "A modified chronic infection model for testing treatment of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms on implants", PLoS One, 9, pp.e103688~ (2014)
- Nishitani K, "Quantifying the natural history of biofilm formation in vivo during the establishment of chronic implant-associated Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis in mice to identify critical pathogen and host factors", J Orthop Res, 33, pp.1311~1319 (2015)
- Jacqueline C, "Impact of bacterial biofilm on the treatment of prosthetic joint infections", J Antimicrob Chemother, (69 Suppl 1), pp.37~40 (2014)
- Do-Kyung Lee, "Infection and revision rates following primary total knee arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis versus osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis", Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 25(12), pp.3800~3807 (2017), Springer Nature[DOI]
- Vilchez F, "Outcome and predictors of treatment failure in early post-surgical prosthetic joint infections due to Staphylococcus aureus treated with debridement", Clin Microbiol Infect, 17, pp.439~444 (2011)
- Vasso M, "Prosthetic knee infection by resistant bacteria: the worst-case scenario", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 24, pp.3140~3146 (2016)
- Berbari EF, "Culture-negative prosthetic joint infection", Clin Infect Dis, 45, pp.1113~1119 (2007)
- Kim YH, "The outcome of infected total knee arthroplasty : culture-positive versus culture-negative", Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 135, pp.1459~1467 (2015)
- Choi HR, "Periprosthetic joint infection with negative culture results : clinical characteristics and treatment outcome", J Arthroplasty, 28, pp.899~903 (2013)