본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Unicompartmental vs. segmental bicompartmental vs. total knee replacement: comparison of clinical outcomes

Al-Dadah Oday|Hawes Georgina|Chapman-Sheath Philip J.|Tice John William|Barrett David S.
대한슬관절학회 (Korean Knee Society)|2020.12|Knee Surgery and Related Research|제32권 |pp. 47-47|DOI 10.1186/s43019-020-00065-0

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

ArthroplastyTotal knee replacementUnicompartmentalBicompartmentalClinical outcome scores

초록

Purpose: Combined medial tibiofemoral and symptomatic patellofemoral osteoarthritis is not amenable to unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). Total knee replacement (TKR) is an invasive option in younger adults with high functional demands. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcome of patients who have undergone UKR, bicompartmental knee replacement (BKR) and TKR up to 2 years post-operatively. Materials and methods: This prospective study comprised 133 subjects including 30 patients in the medial UKR group, 53 patients in the BKR group (combined medial UKR with patellofemoral joint replacement) and 50 patients in the TKR group. All subjects were evaluated using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and the Western Ontario and MacMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Patients in each group were assessed using both scoring systems pre-operatively and 6 months, 1 year and 2 years post-operatively. Results: Significant improvement of OKS was found at 6 months compared to baseline for UKR (22.7 to 38.1, p = 0.046), BKR (22.6 to 36.8, p < 0.001) and TKR (16.6 to 34.5, p < 0.001). Significant improvement was also found for the WOMAC sub-scores for all three groups during this time period. After 6 months, there was no further statistically significant improvement in either outcome score in any of the groups up to the 2-year follow-up results. There was no significant difference in either outcome score post-operatively between the three groups. Conclusion: The magnitude of clinical improvement following knee replacement is greatest at 6 months; thereafter, only modest improvements continue to occur. This study also found no significant differences of outcomes at 2 years after surgery among UKR, BKR and TKR. BKR is a good alternative option for combined symptomatic medial and patellofemoral arthritis of the knee.

Abstract

Purpose: Combined medial tibiofemoral and symptomatic patellofemoral osteoarthritis is not amenable to unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). Total knee replacement (TKR) is an invasive option in younger adults with high functional demands. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcome of patients who have undergone UKR, bicompartmental knee replacement (BKR) and TKR up to 2 years post-operatively. Materials and methods: This prospective study comprised 133 subjects including 30 patients in the medial UKR group, 53 patients in the BKR group (combined medial UKR with patellofemoral joint replacement) and 50 patients in the TKR group. All subjects were evaluated using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and the Western Ontario and MacMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Patients in each group were assessed using both scoring systems pre-operatively and 6 months, 1 year and 2 years post-operatively. Results: Significant improvement of OKS was found at 6 months compared to baseline for UKR (22.7 to 38.1, p = 0.046), BKR (22.6 to 36.8, p < 0.001) and TKR (16.6 to 34.5, p < 0.001). Significant improvement was also found for the WOMAC sub-scores for all three groups during this time period. After 6 months, there was no further statistically significant improvement in either outcome score in any of the groups up to the 2-year follow-up results. There was no significant difference in either outcome score post-operatively between the three groups. Conclusion: The magnitude of clinical improvement following knee replacement is greatest at 6 months; thereafter, only modest improvements continue to occur. This study also found no significant differences of outcomes at 2 years after surgery among UKR, BKR and TKR. BKR is a good alternative option for combined symptomatic medial and patellofemoral arthritis of the knee.

참고문헌 (43)

  1. Price AJ, "A second decade lifetable survival analysis of the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 469(1), pp.174~179 (2011)
  2. Beard DJ, "The influence of the presence and severity of pre-existing patellofemoral degenerative changes on the outcome of the Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement", J Bone Joint Surg(Br), 89(12), pp.1597~1601 (2007)
  3. Beard DJ, "Preoperative clinical and radiological assessment of the patellofemoral joint in unicompartmental knee replacement and its influence on outcome", J Bone Joint Surg(Br), 89(12), pp.1602~1607 (2007)
  4. Berger RA, "The progression of patellofemoral arthrosis after medial unicompartmental replacement: results at 11 to 15 years", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 428, pp.92~99 (2004)
  5. Hernigou P, "Patellar impingement following unicompartmental arthroplasty", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 84-A(7), pp.1132~1137 (2002)
  6. Weale AE, "Radiological changes five years after unicompartmental knee replacement", J Bone Joint Surg(Br), 82(7), pp.996~1000 (2000)
  7. van Wagenberg JM, "Midterm clinical results of the Autocentric II patellofemoral prosthesis", Int Orthop, 33(6), pp.1603~1608 (2009)
  8. Butler JE, "Patellofemoral arthroplasty with a custom-fit femoral prosthesis", Orthopedics, 32(2), pp.81~ (2009)
  9. Leadbetter WB, "Patellofemoral arthroplasty:a multi-centre study with minimum 2-year follow-up", Int Orthop, 33(6), pp.1597~1601 (2009)
  10. van Jonbergen HP, "Isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis", Acta Orthop, 81(2), pp.199~205 (2010)
  11. Confalonieri N, "Tissue sparing surgery in knee reconstruction : unicompartmental(UKA), patellofemoral(PFA), UKA + PFA, bi-unicompartmental(Bi-UKA)arthroplasties", J Orthop Traumatol, 9(3), pp.171~177 (2008)
  12. Farr J 2nd, "Optimizing patellofemoral arthroplasty", Knee, 15(5), pp.339~347 (2008)
  13. Parratte S, "Survival of bicompartmental knee arthroplasty at 5 to 23 years", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 468(1), pp.64~72 (2010)
  14. Heyse TJ, "UKA in combination with PFR at average 12-year follow-up", Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 130(10), pp.1227~1230 (2010)
  15. Confalonieri N, "Biunicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty : a matched paired study with early clinical results", Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 129(9), pp.1157~1163 (2009)
  16. Palumbo BT, "Initial experience of the Journey-Deuce bicompartmental knee prosthesis: a review of 36 cases", J Arthroplast, 26(6 Suppl), pp.40~45 (2011)
  17. Cameron ML, "Reproducibility and reliability of the outerbridge classification for grading chondral lesions of the knee arthroscopically", Am J Sports Med, 31(1), pp.83~86 (2003)
  18. Outerbridge RE, "The etiology of chondromalacia patellae", J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 43-B, pp.752~757 (1961)
  19. Outerbridge RE, "The problem of chondromalacia patellae", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 110, pp.177~196 (1975)
  20. Dawson J, "Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement", J Bone Joint Surg(Br), 80(1), pp.63~69 (1998)
  21. Murray DW, "The use of the Oxford Hip and Knee Scores", J Bone Joint Surg(Br), 89(8), pp.1010~1014 (2007)
  22. Bellamy N, "Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee", J Rheumatol, 15(12), pp.1833~1840 (1988)
  23. "Guidance on the routine collection of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs)" (2012)[URL]
  24. Marx RG, "Measuring improvement following total hip and knee arthroplasty using patient-based measures of outcome", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 87(9), pp.1999~2005 (2005)
  25. Goodfellow JW, "The Oxford Knee for unicompartmental osteoarthritis", The first 103 cases. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 70(5), pp.692~701 (1988)
  26. Nilsdotter AK, "Knee arthroplasty : are patients’ expectations fulfilled? A prospective study of pain and function in 102 patients with 5-year follow-up", Acta Orthop, 80(1), pp.55~61 (2009)
  27. Hopper GP, "Participation in sporting activities following knee replacement : total versus unicompartmental", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 16(10), pp.973~979 (2008)
  28. Barrett DS, "Proprioception and function after anterior cruciate reconstruction", J Bone Joint Surg(Br), 73(5), pp.833~837 (1991)
  29. Donell ST, "Isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis", Knee, 14(3), pp.169~176 (2007)
  30. Tria AJ Jr, "Bicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee", Instr Course Lect, 59, pp.61~73 (2010)
  31. Lonner JH, "Modular bicompartmental knee arthroplasty with robotic arm assistance", Am J Orthop, 38(2 Suppl), pp.28~31 (2009)
  32. Rolston L, "Conversion of lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty to anterior cruciate retaining tricompartmental knee arthroplasty", Knee, 17(3), pp.249~251 (2010)
  33. Miller RK, "In vitro measurement of patellofemoral force after three types of knee replacement", J Bone Joint Surg(Br), 80(5), pp.900~906 (1998)
  34. Price AJ, "Simultaneous in vitro measurement of patellofemoral kinematics and forces following Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement", J Bone Joint Surg(Br), 88(12), pp.1591~1595 (2006)
  35. Wunschel M, "Influence of bi-and tri-compartmental knee arthroplasty on the kinematics of the knee joint", BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 12, pp.29~ (2011)
  36. J. Leffler, "Joint kinematics following bi-compartmental knee replacement during daily life motor tasks", Gait & Posture, 36(3), pp.454~460 (2012), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  37. Wang H, "Influence of bicompartmental knee replacement on stand-to-sit movement", Res Q Exerc Sport, 83(2), pp.136~142 (2012)
  38. Wang H, "Gait analysis of patients with an off-the-shelf total knee replacement versus customized bicompartmental knee replacement", Int Orthop, 42(4), pp.805~810 (2018)
  39. Engh GA, "A bi-compartmental solution: what the Deuce?", Orthopedics, 30(9), pp.770~771 (2007)
  40. Rolston L, "Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty:a bone-sparing, ligament-sparing, and minimally invasive alternative for active patients", Orthopedics, 30(8 Suppl), pp.70~73 (2007)
  41. Rolston L, "Assessment of knee alignment after bicompartmental knee arthroplasty", J Arthroplast, 24(7), pp.1111~1114 (2009)
  42. Morrison TA, "Early adverse results with bicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort comparison to total knee arthroplasty", J Arthroplast, 26(6 Suppl), pp.35~39 (2011)
  43. Muller M, "The bicompartmental knee joint prosthesis Journey Deuce : Failure analysis and optimization strategies", Orthopade, 41(11), pp.894~904 (2012)

관련 논문AI추천

Long­-Term Clinical Results of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Younger than 60 Years of Age: Minimum 10­-Year Follow-­upJung Soo Lee, Ki Hyuk Koo, Kyung Tae Kim, Min Su Kang, Song Lee대한슬관절학회 · Knee Surgery and Related Research2018 · 제30권 제1호Are “Patellofemoral Symptoms” Truly Related to the Patellofemoral Joint?Andrew P. Davies, Mahdi Yacine Khalfaoui, Rafik Yassa대한슬관절학회 · Knee Surgery and Related Research2016 · 제28권 제1호The Influence of Postoperative Tibiofemoral Alignment on the Clinical Results of Unicompartmental Knee ArthroplastyJung Soo Lee, Kyung Hwan Boo, Kyung Tae Kim, Song Lee, Tae Woo Kim대한슬관절학회 · Knee Surgery and Related Research2012 · 제24권 제2호Preserving coronal knee alignment of the knee (CPAK) in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty correlates with superior patient-reported outcomes윤국로, 이명철, 이재민, Hyuk‑Soo Han, Sung Eun Kim대한슬관절학회 · Knee Surgery and Related Research2024 · 제36권 Outcome of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies between Fixed and Mobile Bearings Focusing on ComplicationsKwang-Jun Oh, Manan Ramesh Gujarathi, Young-Bong Ko대한슬관절학회 · Knee Surgery and Related Research2015 · 제27권 제3호Evidence-based surgical technique for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplastyChoi Sang Min, Kim Tae Kyun, Kim Woo Hyun, Meshram Prashant, Mittal Anurag대한슬관절학회 · Knee Surgery and Related Research2021 · 제33권

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (63건)

Comparison of the postoperative analgesic effect for infiltration between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee and that of periarticular multimodal drug injection in total knee arthroplasty: retrospective study in the immediate postoperative period손원용, Ok-Gul Kim, In Seung Lee, Seung-Suk Seo, Dae-Won Jungpp. 1-1Correlation between meniscal extrusion and symptom duration, alignment, and arthritic changes in medial meniscus posterior root tear: research article김동휘, Hyun Hak Kim, 이광철, Dong Hyuk Chapp. 2-2Outcomes and component-positioning in total knee arthroplasty may be comparable between supervised trained surgeons and their supervisorYoshinari Miyamoto, Yozo Katsuragawa, Kazumi Gotopp. 3-3Calcium phosphate injection of symptomatic bone marrow lesions of the knee: what is the current clinical evidence?J. T. K. Melton, D. S. Angadi, D. Edwardspp. 4-4The effect of interleukin-8 in the early stage after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with remnant preservationBeom Koo Lee, Ji-Uk Choi, Kyung-Ok Kim, Jae Ang Sim, 박홍기pp. 5-5
원문 보기