Long-Term Clinical Results of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Younger than 60 Years of Age: Minimum 10-Year Follow-up
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: To evaluate the long-term clinical results and survivorship of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in patients younger than 60 years of age. Materials and Methods: One hundred and six cases of medial UKA with a minimum follow-up of 10 years were selected for this study. There were 80 patients and the preoperative diagnosis was osteoarthritis in all cases. The mean age of the patients was 54.2 years and the mean duration of followup was 12.1 years. Clinical assessments were performed using the Knee Society clinical rating system, and a survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: The mean knee and function scores improved from 52.8±8.4 points and 56.6±10.6 points preoperatively to 85.4±9.1 points and 84.7±10.4 points at the last follow-up, respectively (p<0.001). The mean range of motion was recovered from 130.7° to 132.8° at the last follow-up. Complications occurred in 20 cases (16.7%) and the most prevalent complication was mobile bearing dislocation (n=9, 7.5%). The 10-year survival rate was 92.8% when conversion to total knee arthroplasty was defined as failure, whereas 89.3% when failure was defined as all revision surgeries. Conclusions: The long-term clinical results of UKA were satisfactory in patients under 60 years of age. Therefore, UKA could be a useful method for the treatment of medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee in patients younger than 60 years of age.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the long-term clinical results and survivorship of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in patients younger than 60 years of age. Materials and Methods: One hundred and six cases of medial UKA with a minimum follow-up of 10 years were selected for this study. There were 80 patients and the preoperative diagnosis was osteoarthritis in all cases. The mean age of the patients was 54.2 years and the mean duration of followup was 12.1 years. Clinical assessments were performed using the Knee Society clinical rating system, and a survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: The mean knee and function scores improved from 52.8±8.4 points and 56.6±10.6 points preoperatively to 85.4±9.1 points and 84.7±10.4 points at the last follow-up, respectively (p<0.001). The mean range of motion was recovered from 130.7° to 132.8° at the last follow-up. Complications occurred in 20 cases (16.7%) and the most prevalent complication was mobile bearing dislocation (n=9, 7.5%). The 10-year survival rate was 92.8% when conversion to total knee arthroplasty was defined as failure, whereas 89.3% when failure was defined as all revision surgeries. Conclusions: The long-term clinical results of UKA were satisfactory in patients under 60 years of age. Therefore, UKA could be a useful method for the treatment of medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee in patients younger than 60 years of age.
참고문헌 (18)
- Walker T, "Sports, physical activity and patient-reported outcomes after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in young patients", J Arthroplasty, 30, pp.1911~1916 (2015)[DOI]
- 김경태, "60세 미만과 60세 이상의 환자에서 시행한 슬관절 부분치환술의 결과 비교", 대한정형외과학회지, 44(2), pp.192~200 (2009), 대한정형외과학회
- Kort NP, "The Oxford phase III unicompartmental knee replacement in patients less than 60 years of age", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 15, pp.356~360 (2007)[DOI]
- Kozinn SC, "Unicondylar knee arthroplasty", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 71, pp.145~150 (1989)[DOI]
- Murray DW, "Mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacement", Orthopedics, 28, pp.985~987 (2005)
- Pennington DW, "Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients sixty years of age or younger", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 85, pp.1968~1973 (2003)[DOI]
- W-Dahl A, "Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients aged less than 65", Acta Orthop, 81, pp.90~94 (2010)[DOI]
- Heyse TJ, "Survivorship of UKA in the middle-aged", Knee, 19, pp.585~591 (2012)[DOI]
- Price AJ, "Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients younger and older than 60 years of age", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 87, pp.1488~1492 (2005)
- Insall JN, "Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (248), pp.13~14 (1989)
- Bruni D, "Minimum thickness of all-poly tibial component unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients younger than 60 years does not increase revision rate for aseptic loosening", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 21, pp.2462~2467 (2013)[DOI]
- Faour Martin O, "The young patient and the medial unicompartmental knee replacement", Acta Orthop Belg, 81, pp.283~288 (2015)
- Parratte S, "Medial unicompartmental knee replacement in the under-50s", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 91, pp.351~356 (2009)
- Streit MR, "Minimally invasive Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in young patients", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 25, pp.660~668 (2017)[DOI]
- Hanssen AD, "Surgical options for the middle-aged patient with osteoarthritis of the knee joint", Instr Course Lect, 50, pp.499~511 (2001)
- 김영준, "Mid-Term Results of Oxford Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in Young Asian Patients Less than 60 Years of Age: A Minimum 5-Year Follow-up", Knee Surgery and Related Research, 29(2), pp.122~128 (2017), 대한슬관절학회
- Thompson SA, "Factors associated with poor outcomes following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: redefining the "classic" indications for surgery", J Arthroplasty, 28, pp.1561~1564 (2013)[DOI]
- Pandit H, "Unnecessary contraindications for mobilebearing unicompartmental knee replacement", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 93, pp.622~628 (2011)