본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Outcome of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies between Fixed and Mobile Bearings Focusing on Complications

2

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The purpose of this systematic review is to collate results of studies comparing fixed and mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), focusing on complications and timing for reoperations. Out of 723 results derived from PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane database search engines on bearings in arthroplasty, 10 studies comparing clinical results of fixed bearings to mobile bearings in UKA were found eligible for analysis. The reoperation rate was calculated using a novel method such as reoperations per hundred component years, and the causes of specific reoperations were investigated. The overall reoperation rate per hundred component years was similar between the mobile bearings (1.392) and fixed bearings (1.377); however, mobile bearings were more susceptible to reoperations in cases with aseptic loosening (0.393>0.255), progression of arthritis (0.428>0.357) and implant dislocation (0.286>0). The overall incidence of complications is similar for fixed and mobile bearing designs in UKA. The discussion on complications presented above may assist surgeons in their choice of bearing design.

Abstract

The purpose of this systematic review is to collate results of studies comparing fixed and mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), focusing on complications and timing for reoperations. Out of 723 results derived from PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane database search engines on bearings in arthroplasty, 10 studies comparing clinical results of fixed bearings to mobile bearings in UKA were found eligible for analysis. The reoperation rate was calculated using a novel method such as reoperations per hundred component years, and the causes of specific reoperations were investigated. The overall reoperation rate per hundred component years was similar between the mobile bearings (1.392) and fixed bearings (1.377); however, mobile bearings were more susceptible to reoperations in cases with aseptic loosening (0.393>0.255), progression of arthritis (0.428>0.357) and implant dislocation (0.286>0). The overall incidence of complications is similar for fixed and mobile bearing designs in UKA. The discussion on complications presented above may assist surgeons in their choice of bearing design.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. Scott RD, "Mobile-versus fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty", Instr Course Lect, 59, pp.57~60 (2010)
  2. Ashraf T, "Polyethylene wear in a non-congruous unicompartmental knee replacement : a retrieval analysis", Knee, 11, pp.177~181 (2004)
  3. Psychoyios V, "Wear of congruent meniscal bearings in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty : a retrieval study of 16 specimens", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 80, pp.976~982 (1998)
  4. Simpson DJ, "The effect of bearing congruency, thickness and alignment on the stresses in unicompartmental knee replacements", Clin Biomech(Bristol, Avon), 23, pp.1148~1157 (2008)
  5. Gleeson RE, "Fixed or mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacement? A comparative cohort study", Knee, 11, pp.379~384 (2004)
  6. Bonutti PM, "Contemporary unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: fixed vs mobile bearing", J Arthroplasty, 23(7 Suppl), pp.24~27 (2008)
  7. Bini S, "Surgeon, implant, and patient variables may explain variability in early revision rates reported for unicompartmental arthroplasty", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 95, pp.2195~2202 (2013)
  8. Emerson RH Jr, "Comparison of a mobile with a fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee implant", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (404), pp.62~70 (2002)
  9. Smith TO, "Fixed versus mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacement : a meta-analysis", Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 95, pp.599~605 (2009)
  10. Peersman G, "Fixed- versus mobile-bearing UKA: a systematic review and meta-analysis", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc (2014)[DOI]
  11. Moher D, "Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement", BMJ, 339, pp.b2535~ (2009)
  12. "Annual report 2008" (2008)[URL]
  13. Parratte S, "No long-term difference between fixed and mobile medial unicompartmental arthroplasty", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 470, pp.61~68 (2012)
  14. Biau DJ, "No difference in quality-of-life outcomes after mobile and fixed-bearing medial unicompartmental knee replacement", J Arthroplasty, 28, pp.220~226 (2013)
  15. Li MG, "Mobile vs. fixed bearing unicondylar knee arthroplasty: a randomized study on short term clinical outcomes and knee kinematics", Knee, 13, pp.365~370 (2006)
  16. Whittaker JP, "Does bearing design influence midterm survivorship of unicompartmental arthroplasty?", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 468, pp.73~81 (2010)
  17. Confalonieri N, "Comparison of a mobile with a fixed tibial bearing unicompartimental knee prosthesis : a prospective randomized trial using a dedicated outcome score", Knee, 11, pp.357~362 (2004)
  18. Bhattacharya R, "Survivorship and patient satisfaction of a fixed bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty incorporating an all-polyethylene tibial component", Knee, 19, pp.348~351 (2012)
  19. Catani F, "Muscle activity around the knee and gait performance in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty patients : a comparative study on fixed-and mobile-bearing designs", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 20, pp.1042~1048 (2012)
  20. Emerson RH Jr, "Soft-tissue balance and alignment in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 74, pp.807~810 (1992)
  21. Kozinn SC, "Unicondylar knee arthroplasty", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 71, pp.145~150 (1989)
  22. Goodfellow JW, "The Oxford Knee for unicompartmental osteoarthritis : the first 103 cases", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 70, pp.692~701 (1988)
  23. Cheng T, "Fixed- versus mobile-bearing unicondylar knee arthroplasty: are failure modes different?", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 21, pp.2433~2441 (2013)
  24. Lim HC, "Comparison between Unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty in the same patient(short term results)", J Korean Knee Soc, 19, pp.7~13 (2007)
  25. Kim KT, "Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty : minimum 5-year follow-up results", J Korean Knee Soc, 20, pp.50~57 (2008)
  26. Kim KW, "Short term results of Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty", J Korean Knee Soc, 20, pp.58~64 (2008)
  27. Kyung Tae Kim, "The Influence of Postoperative Tibiofemoral Alignment on the Clinical Results of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty", Knee Surgery and Related Research, 24(2), pp.85~90 (2012), 대한슬관절학회[DOI]
  28. Newman J, "Unicompartmental or total knee replacement : the 15-year results of a prospective randomised controlled trial", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 91, pp.52~57 (2009)
  29. Newman JH, "Unicompartmental or total knee replacement? Five-year results of a prospective, randomised trial of 102 osteoarthritic knees with unicompartmental arthritis", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 80, pp.862~865 (1998)
  30. Panni AS, "Unicompartmental knee replacement provides early clinical and functional improvement stabilizing over time", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 20, pp.579~585 (2012)
  31. Huang CH, "Particle size and morphology of UHMWPE wear debris in failed total knee arthroplasties : a comparison between mobile bearing and fixed bearing knees", J Orthop Res, 20, pp.1038~1041 (2002)
  32. Green TR, "Polyethylene particles of a ‘critical size’ are necessary for the induction of cytokines by macrophages in vitro", Biomaterials, 19, pp.2297~2302 (1998)
  33. Bloom KJ, "The effects of primary implant bearing design on the complexity of revision unicondylar knee arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 29, pp.106~109 (2014)
  34. Manson TT, "Unicondylar knee retrieval analysis", J Arthroplasty, 25(6 Suppl), pp.108~111 (2010)
  35. Kretzer JP, "Wear analysis of unicondylar mobile bearing and fixed bearing knee systems : a knee simulator study", Acta Biomater, 7, pp.710~715 (2011)
  36. Brockett CL, "The wear of fixed and mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacements", Proc Inst Mech Eng H, 225, pp.511~519 (2011)

관련 논문AI추천

Redislocation after Bearing Exchange for the Treatment of Mobile Bearing Dislocation in Medial Unicompartmental Knee ArthroplastyHong­Chul Lim, Hyun­Gon Kim, Ji­Hoon Bae, Sang­Gyun Kim, Seung­Yup Lee대한슬관절학회 · Knee Surgery and Related Research2018 · 제30권 제3호Analysis and Treatment of Complications after Unicompartmental Knee ArthroplastyJae Il Lee, Jin Woo Kim, Kyung Tae Kim, Song Lee대한슬관절학회 · Knee Surgery and Related Research2016 · 제28권 제1호Long­-Term Clinical Results of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Younger than 60 Years of Age: Minimum 10­-Year Follow-­upJung Soo Lee, Ki Hyuk Koo, Kyung Tae Kim, Min Su Kang, Song Lee대한슬관절학회 · Knee Surgery and Related Research2018 · 제30권 제1호Intentionally Increased Flexion Angle of the Femoral Component in Mobile Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty송상준, Kang-Il Kim, Kye-Youl Cho, Kyu-Jin Kim대한슬관절학회 · Knee Surgery and Related Research2018 · 제30권 제1호Evidence-based surgical technique for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplastyChoi Sang Min, Kim Tae Kyun, Kim Woo Hyun, Meshram Prashant, Mittal Anurag대한슬관절학회 · Knee Surgery and Related Research2021 · 제33권 Mid-Term Results of Oxford Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in Young Asian Patients Less than 60 Years of Age: A Minimum 5-Year Follow-up강석웅, 곽창훈, 김부환, 김영준, 송무호, 유성호대한슬관절학회 · Knee Surgery and Related Research2017 · 제29권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)