추모의 정치성과 재현 -정조의 단종사적 정비와 《월중도(越中圖)》-
Politics of Commemoration and Representation -Commemorative project on King Danjong by King Jeongjo and Woljung-do
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Woljung-do is a topographical painting of Youngwol where the sixth king of the Joseon dynasty Danjong was exiled and met his death. It consists of eight leaves representing the places of exile, the tomb of Danjong, and the shrines of his loyal subjects who followed him to death. These are numerous places related to Danjong, but what the paintings actually depict is not the Youngwol of Danjong’s time but the restored and reconstructed Youngwol by King Jeongjo, almost 400years after Danjong's death. This paper focuses on the political intention of Jeongjo's project in commemoration of Danjong and examines how it was visualized in Woljung-do. The memorial project of Danjong was first initiated by King Sukjong. Sukjong restored Danjong’s status as king 300 years after his death. He promoted the memorial project by constructing the royal tomb of Danjong and restored the honors of Danjong's royal subjects. Sukjong’s political intention for the project was to use the fidelity of loyal servants of Danjong as a means of instructing Confucian virtues such as courage, moral rectitude, and loyalty for his subjects. In doing so, he attempted to strengthen the royal authority. Jeongjo followed Sukjong's politically-motivated commemoration projects and made further efforts to restore Danjong’s kingly status and honor. The results can be found in Woljung-do. Woljung-do not only depicts the historical sites related to Danjong, but it also includes pictorial illustrations of the places that signify the loyalty of his followers. The album shows how the memorial project of Danjong is based on the king Jeongjo's intention of promoting loyalty. Give that there is no precedent in Joseon court painting, Wonljung-do is extremely unique. Jeongjo’s memorial project differs radically from Sukjong’s. While Sukjong justified his action to restore Danjong’s kingly status thorough historical verification, Jeongjo dissociated the tragedy of Danjong from its historical context and rather reconstructed it as a legendary story of Confucian loyalty. Sukjong and Jeongjo had different views on the commemoration project. Accordingly, they accomplished their own project differently. Sukjong and his son Yongjo constructed the royal tomb of Danjong and erected the memorial monuments such as shrines and stone tablets, following the traditional manner of commemorating Kings. Jeongjo, however, did not obey the convention. The sites of Danjong's shelter and pavilion were excavated and rebuilt according to Jeongjo’s order. Through Jeongjo’s efforts, the memory of Danjong was drawn out of the historical context and became 'present.' Reconstruction of memory which started with the restoration of ruins was completed by the making of Woljung-do. In Woljung-do, the newly built memorial buildings for Danjong such as the royal tomb were painted in detail in order to highlight the king Jeongjo’s enterprise of creating the timeless space of loyalty. Thus, the album not only reassures the authority of Jeongjo's memorial project. It also vividly visualizes both the historical evocation of and the reconstructed memory of Danjong. Woljung-do includes a topographical landscape painting depicting the natural scenery of the site. It also includes a map that is used to complement geographical information on Youngwol. These pictorial forms show that Woljung-do emphasizes the sense of topographical veracity both in visual and intellectual terms. Although Woljung-do is concerned with the geographical features of Youngwol, it does not describe Youngwol as it was during the time of Jeongjo. The albulm does not incorporate other contemporary local facilities that are unrelated to Danjong. After all, Woljung-do is neither an illustration of Youngwol of the time of Danjong nor a pictorial record of the time of its production in 1791. It is a politically intended pictorial representation of a newly reconstructed site embodying royal authority and loyalty. The commemoration for the dead reflects the desire of the living. In this regard, Woljung-do is not merely a memorial painting of Danjong. It is a reflection of Jeongjo's political intention.
Abstract
Woljung-do is a topographical painting of Youngwol where the sixth king of the Joseon dynasty Danjong was exiled and met his death. It consists of eight leaves representing the places of exile, the tomb of Danjong, and the shrines of his loyal subjects who followed him to death. These are numerous places related to Danjong, but what the paintings actually depict is not the Youngwol of Danjong’s time but the restored and reconstructed Youngwol by King Jeongjo, almost 400years after Danjong's death. This paper focuses on the political intention of Jeongjo's project in commemoration of Danjong and examines how it was visualized in Woljung-do. The memorial project of Danjong was first initiated by King Sukjong. Sukjong restored Danjong’s status as king 300 years after his death. He promoted the memorial project by constructing the royal tomb of Danjong and restored the honors of Danjong's royal subjects. Sukjong’s political intention for the project was to use the fidelity of loyal servants of Danjong as a means of instructing Confucian virtues such as courage, moral rectitude, and loyalty for his subjects. In doing so, he attempted to strengthen the royal authority. Jeongjo followed Sukjong's politically-motivated commemoration projects and made further efforts to restore Danjong’s kingly status and honor. The results can be found in Woljung-do. Woljung-do not only depicts the historical sites related to Danjong, but it also includes pictorial illustrations of the places that signify the loyalty of his followers. The album shows how the memorial project of Danjong is based on the king Jeongjo's intention of promoting loyalty. Give that there is no precedent in Joseon court painting, Wonljung-do is extremely unique. Jeongjo’s memorial project differs radically from Sukjong’s. While Sukjong justified his action to restore Danjong’s kingly status thorough historical verification, Jeongjo dissociated the tragedy of Danjong from its historical context and rather reconstructed it as a legendary story of Confucian loyalty. Sukjong and Jeongjo had different views on the commemoration project. Accordingly, they accomplished their own project differently. Sukjong and his son Yongjo constructed the royal tomb of Danjong and erected the memorial monuments such as shrines and stone tablets, following the traditional manner of commemorating Kings. Jeongjo, however, did not obey the convention. The sites of Danjong's shelter and pavilion were excavated and rebuilt according to Jeongjo’s order. Through Jeongjo’s efforts, the memory of Danjong was drawn out of the historical context and became 'present.' Reconstruction of memory which started with the restoration of ruins was completed by the making of Woljung-do. In Woljung-do, the newly built memorial buildings for Danjong such as the royal tomb were painted in detail in order to highlight the king Jeongjo’s enterprise of creating the timeless space of loyalty. Thus, the album not only reassures the authority of Jeongjo's memorial project. It also vividly visualizes both the historical evocation of and the reconstructed memory of Danjong. Woljung-do includes a topographical landscape painting depicting the natural scenery of the site. It also includes a map that is used to complement geographical information on Youngwol. These pictorial forms show that Woljung-do emphasizes the sense of topographical veracity both in visual and intellectual terms. Although Woljung-do is concerned with the geographical features of Youngwol, it does not describe Youngwol as it was during the time of Jeongjo. The albulm does not incorporate other contemporary local facilities that are unrelated to Danjong. After all, Woljung-do is neither an illustration of Youngwol of the time of Danjong nor a pictorial record of the time of its production in 1791. It is a politically intended pictorial representation of a newly reconstructed site embodying royal authority and loyalty. The commemoration for the dead reflects the desire of the living. In this regard, Woljung-do is not merely a memorial painting of Danjong. It is a reflection of Jeongjo's political intention.
참고문헌 (34)
- "巽坎妙訣", ~
- "端宗實錄", ~
- "肅宗實錄", ~
- "英祖實錄", ~
- "正祖實錄", ~
- "莊陵謄錄", ~
- "(改撰)莊陵誌", ~
- "莊陵誌續編", ~
- "莊陵事略", ~
- "莊陵事補", ~
- "關東誌", ~
- "江原道誌", ~
- 강원대학교 인문과학연구소 고문서연구센터, "(국역)관동지" (2007), 강원도
- 국립춘천박물관, "우리 땅 우리 진경" (2003), 국립춘천박물관
- 박광용, "영조와 정조의 나라" (1998), 푸른역사
- 박정혜, "조선시대 궁정기록화 연구" (2000), 일지사
- 박정혜, "조선왕실의 행사그림과 옛지도" (2005), 민속원
- 方東仁, "한국지도의 역사" (2001), 신구문화사
- 서울대학교 규장각, "규장각 명품도록" (2000), 서울대학교
- 안휘준, "奎章閣所藏繪畵의 內容과 性格" (1989), 서울大學校韓國文化硏究所
- 안휘준, "藏書閣所藏繪畵資料", 91(1) (1991), 韓國精神文化硏究院
- 안휘준, "옛 궁궐 그림" (1997), 대원사
- 안휘준, "옛 지도와 회화 in: 우리 옛 지도와 그 아름다움" (2000), 효형출판
- 윤정, "숙종대 端宗 追復의 정치사적 의미", 한국사상사학, 22(22), pp.209~246 (2004), 한국사상사학회
- 윤정, "正祖代 端宗 事蹟 정비와 '君臣分義'의 확립", 한국문화, 35(35), pp.235~273 (2005), 규장각한국학연구원
- 윤진영, "단종의 애사(哀史)와 충절의 표상:《 월중도越中圖》in: 월중도", pp.22~30 (2006), 한국학중앙연구원
- 이예성, "19세기 특정한 지역을 그린 고지도와 회화 in: 조선왕실의 행사그림과 옛지도", pp.53~68 (2005), 민속원
- 이예성, "조선 후기의 왕릉도(王陵圖) in: 조선 왕실의 미술문화", pp.205~234 (2005), 대원사
- 정옥자, "朝鮮後期文化運動史" (1988), 一潮閣
- 정옥자, "정조시대의 사상과 문화" (1999), 돌베개
- 최홍규, "정조의 화성 건설" (2002), 일지사
- 최홍규, "정조의 화성 경영 연구" (2005), 일지사
- 한국정신문화연구원, "조선왕실의 책" (2002), 한국정신문화연구원·장서각
- 한림대학교박물관, "영월군의 역사와 문화유적" (1995), 한림대학교박물관
