본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Higher rates of fully preserved posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty using a double tibial cut: a prospective randomized controlled trial

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Purpose: In cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty, posterior cruciate ligament damage may occur during tibial cutting. A prospective randomized study was conducted to investigate whether a novel tibial cutting technique was more effective than the currently used techniques. Materials and methods: patients undergoing cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty were recruited in a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. In 25 patients (group 1) the tibial cut was performed using a double tibial cut technique; in 25 (group 2) and 25 (group 3) patients, the bone island and en bloc resection techniques were performed, respectively. Posterior cruciate ligament integrity and femoral rollback were assessed at the end of surgery. The Oxford Knee Score, WOMAC score and range of motion were assessed postoperatively. Results: Posterior cruciate ligament was completely preserved in 92% of patients in group 1 and in 64% in group 2 and 3, respectively (p=0.03). The Oxford Knee Score and WOMAC scores did not differ between groups (p=0.4). The mean knee flexion was 126.4°, 121.5° and 123.9° in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively (p= 0.04). The femoral rollback at 120° flexion was 80.7%, 72.2% and 75.4% in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively (p=0.01). Conclusions: The double cut technique preserves the posterior cruciate ligament at significantly higher rates than the bone island or en bloc resection techniques. Better posterior cruciate ligament preservation may improve the femoral rollback and knee flexion.

Abstract

Purpose: In cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty, posterior cruciate ligament damage may occur during tibial cutting. A prospective randomized study was conducted to investigate whether a novel tibial cutting technique was more effective than the currently used techniques. Materials and methods: patients undergoing cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty were recruited in a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. In 25 patients (group 1) the tibial cut was performed using a double tibial cut technique; in 25 (group 2) and 25 (group 3) patients, the bone island and en bloc resection techniques were performed, respectively. Posterior cruciate ligament integrity and femoral rollback were assessed at the end of surgery. The Oxford Knee Score, WOMAC score and range of motion were assessed postoperatively. Results: Posterior cruciate ligament was completely preserved in 92% of patients in group 1 and in 64% in group 2 and 3, respectively (p=0.03). The Oxford Knee Score and WOMAC scores did not differ between groups (p=0.4). The mean knee flexion was 126.4°, 121.5° and 123.9° in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively (p= 0.04). The femoral rollback at 120° flexion was 80.7%, 72.2% and 75.4% in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively (p=0.01). Conclusions: The double cut technique preserves the posterior cruciate ligament at significantly higher rates than the bone island or en bloc resection techniques. Better posterior cruciate ligament preservation may improve the femoral rollback and knee flexion.

참고문헌 (44)

  1. Ahmad CS, "Codominance of the individual posterior cruciate ligament bundles. An analysis of bundle lengths and orientation", Am J Sports Med, 31, pp.221~225 (2003)
  2. Broberg JS, "Comparison of contact kinematics in posterior-stabilized and cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty at long-term follow-up", J Arthroplasty, 35, pp.272~277 (2020)
  3. Ishida K, "Tibiofemroal rotational alignment affects flexion angles in navigated posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty", Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Artrhosc, 26, pp.1532~1539 (2018)
  4. Kennedy NI, "Kinematic analysis of the posterior cruciate ligament, part 1 : the individual and collective function of the anterolateral and posteromedial bundles", Am J Sports Med, 41, pp.2828~2838 (2013)
  5. Papannagari R, "Function of posterior cruciate ligament bundles during in vivo knee flexion", Am J Sports Med, 35, pp.1507~1512 (2007)
  6. Smith LA, "In vivo knee kinematics : how important are the roles of femoral geometry and cruciate ligaments?", J Arthroplasty, 36, pp.1445~1454 (2021)
  7. Stiehl JB, "Fluorosocpic analysis of kinematics after posterior-cruciate retaining knee arthroplasty", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 77, pp.884~889 (1995)
  8. Veltri DM, "The role of the cruciate and posterolateral ligaments in stability of the Knee. A biomechanical study", Am J Sport Med, 23(4), pp.436~443 (1995)
  9. Winkler PW, "Evolving evidence in the treatment of primary and recurrent posterior cruciate ligament injuries, part 1 : anatomy, biomechanics and diagnostics", Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Artrhosc, 29, pp.672~681 (2021)
  10. Angerame MR, "Total knee arthroplasty kinematics", J Arthroplasty, 34(10), pp.2502~2510 (2019)
  11. Komistek RD, "In vivo kinematics for subjects with and without an anterior cruciate ligament", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 404, pp.315~325 (2002)
  12. Moewis P, "Retention of posterior cruciate ligament alone may not achieve physiological knee joint kinematics after total knee arthroplasty. A Retrospective Study", J Bone J Surg, 103(2), pp.146~154 (2020)
  13. Goyal K, "In vivo analysis of the isolated posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee during functional activities", Am J Sports Med, 40, pp.777~785 (2012)
  14. Baker PN, "The role of pain and function in determining patients satisfaction after total knee replacement", J Bone Joint Surg, 89B(7), pp.893~900 (2007)
  15. Bourne RB, "Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty : who is satisfied and who is not?", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 468, pp.57~63 (2010)
  16. Noble PC, "Patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 453, pp.35~43 (2006)
  17. Abdel MP, "Increased long-term survival of posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior cruciate-stabilizing total knee replacements", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 93, pp.2072~2078 (2011)
  18. Kanna R, "Cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty has a better 10 year survival than posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty : a systematic review and meta-analysis", J Exp Orthop, 10, pp.19~ (2023)
  19. Vertullo CJ, "The effect of prosthetic design and polyethylene type on the risk of revision for infection in total knee replacement", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 100, pp.2033~2040 (2018)
  20. Cinotti G, "Preserving the PCL during the tibial cut in total knee arthroplasty", Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Artrosc, 25(8), pp.2594~2601 (2017)
  21. Feyen H, "Partial resection of the PCL insertion site during tibial preparation in cruciate-retain-ing TKA", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 21, pp.2674~2726 (2013)
  22. Liabaud B, "Is the posterior cruciate ligament destabilized after the tibial cut in a cruciate retaining total knee replacement?", Knee, 20, pp.412~415 (2013)
  23. Matziolis G, "How much of the PCL is really preserved during the tibial cut?", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 20, pp.1083~1086 (2012)
  24. Sessa P, "The risk of sacrificing the PCL in cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty and the relationship to the sagittal inclination of the tibial plateau", Knee, 22, pp.51~55 (2015)
  25. Shannon FJ, "The posterior cruciate ligament-preserving total knee replacement: do we ‘preserve’ it? A radiological study", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 89, pp.766~771 (2007)
  26. Totlis T, "Cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty : how much of the PCL is really retained", Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc, 25, pp.3556~ (2017)
  27. Galli M, "Reliability of the Ahlback classification of knee osteoarthritis", Osteoarthr Cartil, 11(8), pp.580~584 (2003)
  28. Cinotti G, "Mapping of the anterior tibial profile to identify accurate reference points for sagittal alignment of tibial component in total knee arthroplasty", Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 103(6), pp.959~963 (2017)[DOI]
  29. Meneghini RM, "Development of a modern knee society radiographic evaluation system and methodology for total knee arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 30, pp.2311~2314 (2015)
  30. Dion C-AB, "Does recession of the posterior cruciate ligament influence outcome in total knee arthroplasty?", J Arthroplasty, 34, pp.2383~2397 (2019)
  31. Escobar A, "Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after total knee replacement", Osteoarthr Cartil, 15, pp.273~280 (2007)
  32. Rosemberg AG, "Insall & Scott, surgery of the knee", pp.1522~ (2006), Churcill Livingstone Elsevier
  33. Wood AR, "Protecting the PCL during total knee arthroplasty using a bone island technique", J Arthroplasty, 33, pp.102~106 (2018)
  34. Moorman CT III, "Tibial insertion of the posterior cruciate ligament : a sagittal plane analysis using gross, histologic, and radiographic methods", Arthroscopy, 24(3), pp.269~275 (2008)
  35. Klemt C, "Asymmetrical tibial polyethylene geometry-cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty does not fully restore in-vivo articular contact kinematics during strenuous activities", Knee Surg Sporst Traumatol Arthrosc, 30, pp.652~660 (2022)
  36. Pfitzner T, "Modifications of femoral component design in multi-radius total knee arthroplasty lead to higher lateral posterior femoro-tibial translation", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 26, pp.1645~1655 (2018)
  37. Jang SW, "Comparison of anterior-stabilized and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty in the same patients : a prospective randomized study", J Arthroplasty, 34(1682–1689), pp.3~ (2019)
  38. Kim J, "rospective sequential comparison of femoral roll-back between cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty using an intra-operative sensor", Knee, 39, pp.253~260 (2022)
  39. Hirsh H, "The posterior cruciate retaining in total knee surgery : save, sacrifice, substitute?", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 309, pp.64~68 (1994)
  40. Misra AN, "The role of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee replacement", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 85, pp.389~392 (2003)
  41. Parsley BS, "Posterior cruciate ligament substitution is not essential for excellent postoperative outcomes in total knee arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 21, pp.127~131 (2006)
  42. Ritter MA, "The role of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee replacement", Bone Joint Res, 1, pp.64~70 (2012)
  43. Sathappan SS, "Midterm results of primary total knee arthroplasty using a dished poly-ethylene insert with a recessed or resected posterior cruciate ligament", J Arthroplasty, 21, pp.1012~1016 (2006)
  44. Straw R, "Posterior cruciate ligament at total knee replacement. Essential, beneficial or a hindrance?", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 85, pp.671~674 (2003)

관련 논문AI추천

Outcomes of the Different Types of Total Knee Arthroplasty with the Identical Femoral Geometry성상철, 이명철, 이상훈, 최원철, Sang Min Lee대한슬관절학회 · Knee Surgery and Related Research2012 · 제24권 제4호Evaluation of Postoperative Range of Motion and Functional Outcomes after Cruciate-Retaining and Posterior-Stabilized High-Flexion Total Knee Arthroplasty박관규, 양익환, 이우석, 한창동, 한창욱연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2012 · 제53권 제4호Effect of Posterior Femoral Condylar Offset and Posterior Tibial Slope on Maximal Flexion Angle of the Knee in Posterior Cruciate Ligament Sacrificing Total Knee Arthroplasty김종헌대한슬관절학회 · Knee Surgery and Related Research2013 · 제25권 제2호Posterior condylar offset changes and its effect on clinical outcomes after posteriorsubstituting, fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: anterior versus posterior referencing강승백, 이승아, 장문종, Chong Bum Chang, Do Hwan Han, Hyung Jun Park, Il-Ung Hwang, Jisu Park, Keummin Hwang, Sohee Oh대한슬관절학회 · Knee Surgery and Related Research2020 · 제32권 Total Knee Arthroplasty Using a Posterior Cruciate Ligament Sacrificing Medial Pivot Knee: Minimum 5-year Follow-up Results염윤식, 이신호, 조성도, Hye-Yong Cho대한슬관절학회 · Knee Surgery and Related Research2014 · 제26권 제3호Changes in Femoral Posterior Condylar Offset, Tibial Posterior Slope Angle, and Joint Line Height after Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty김강일, 배대경, 송상준, 정호연대한슬관절학회 · Knee Surgery and Related Research2016 · 제28권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (47건)