본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한-중 간 RFS를 활용한 Sea&Air 복합운송 활성화에 관한 연구

The Study on the Activation of Sea & Air transportation between Korea and China Using RFS

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경영학

초록

In order to compare and analyze the competitiveness of the towed trailer method being promoted under the Land Combined Freight Vehicle Transportation Agreement and the Phase 1 Protocol with the RFS(Road Feeder Service) method being promoted by the government in the second half of 2021. Based on the volume of Sea&Air shipments between Korea and China over the past 10 years, the analysis of portfolio and ARIMA(Automatic Recursive Movement Average) models, and competitiveness analysis of the existing towed trailer method and RFS (Road Feeder Service, Combined Integrated Transportation) method were conducted. As a result of the study, Shidao Port and Weihai Port in China are found to be “Star Performers” with high market growth and relative market share, and the future transshipment cargo from China will increase from about 42,239 tons in 2021 to about 50,996 tons in 2025. Furthermore, compared to the existing towed trailer method, the RFS method reduces the time by 1 hour and 20 minutes, and costs 86 won per kg. In this situation, in order to activate multimodal transportation between Korea and China, the RFS method, which can shorten time and reduce costs compared to the existing towed trailer method, is actively introduced, and the connection between China’s Weihai Port and Shidao Port, which leads the growth of Sea&Air transshipment between Korea and China, should be strengthened. For this, it was found that it was imperative to gradually expand the target cargo and service areas of the RFS pilot project, as a balanced flow of import and export traffic between the Republic of Korea and China is very important.

Abstract

In order to compare and analyze the competitiveness of the towed trailer method being promoted under the Land Combined Freight Vehicle Transportation Agreement and the Phase 1 Protocol with the RFS(Road Feeder Service) method being promoted by the government in the second half of 2021. Based on the volume of Sea&Air shipments between Korea and China over the past 10 years, the analysis of portfolio and ARIMA(Automatic Recursive Movement Average) models, and competitiveness analysis of the existing towed trailer method and RFS (Road Feeder Service, Combined Integrated Transportation) method were conducted. As a result of the study, Shidao Port and Weihai Port in China are found to be “Star Performers” with high market growth and relative market share, and the future transshipment cargo from China will increase from about 42,239 tons in 2021 to about 50,996 tons in 2025. Furthermore, compared to the existing towed trailer method, the RFS method reduces the time by 1 hour and 20 minutes, and costs 86 won per kg. In this situation, in order to activate multimodal transportation between Korea and China, the RFS method, which can shorten time and reduce costs compared to the existing towed trailer method, is actively introduced, and the connection between China’s Weihai Port and Shidao Port, which leads the growth of Sea&Air transshipment between Korea and China, should be strengthened. For this, it was found that it was imperative to gradually expand the target cargo and service areas of the RFS pilot project, as a balanced flow of import and export traffic between the Republic of Korea and China is very important.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. 관세청, "전자상거래 무역시대 도래, 수출입 4천만 건돌파", 관세청 보도자료, ~ (2019)
  2. 한⋅중 복합운송 활성화 방안에 관한 연구, "고정오", 인하대학교 정석물류통상연구원, 1~136, pp.연구총서 13-03 (2013)
  3. 김군, "중국발 Sea & Air 복합운송 경로 선호도 평가에 관한 연구", 한국항공경영학회지, 9(4), pp.71~91 (2011), 한국항공경영학회
  4. 김광석, "중국발 Sea & Air 복합운송 서비스의 이용실태 및 만족도에 관한 연구", 해운물류연구, (47), pp.223~242 (2005), 한국해운물류학회
  5. 김근섭, "동북아지역 항만간 경쟁에서 부산항의 포지셔닝 분석", 한국항해항만학회지, 32(3), pp.173~178 (2008), 한국항해항만학회
  6. 김율성, "부산항의 한⋅일 복합운송 실태 및 연계방안", 부산발전포럼, 2009(117), pp.49~52 (2009)
  7. 김율성, "해공(Sea&Air)복합운송의 유통경로 및 포트폴리오 분석", 한국항해항만학회지, 32(8), pp.649~654 (2008), 한국항해항만학회
  8. 김창범, "중국효과와 해상", 항공 복합운송, 2007, pp.23(2), 25~40[DOI]
  9. 김태승, "환황해권 Sea&Air 수송의 발전 가능성 전망", 한국항만경제학회지, 22(3), pp.187~205 (2006), 한국항만경제학회
  10. 박호신, "동북아 복합운송경로 선호에 관한 실증적 연구", 관세학회지, 10(4), pp.329~351 (2009), 한국관세학회
  11. 동북아 전자상거래 해상운송 전환수요 분석, "이기열", 한국해양수산개발원, 1~175, pp.연구보고서 2017-13 (2017)
  12. 이태영, "한⋅중 간 해상육상 복합운송시스템 현황과과제", 월간교통, pp.72~75 (2010)
  13. 이학승, "복합운송의 물류경쟁력 강화를 위한 실천적 방안", 통상정보연구, 9(2), pp.285~303 (2007), 한국통상정보학회[DOI]
  14. 이헌수, "한중간 해공복합운송 활성화 전략", 로지스틱스연구, 14(1) (2006), 한국로지스틱스학회
  15. 정태원, "인천지역 해공복합운송시스템(Sea & Air)의 경쟁우위 확보방안", 한국항해항만학회지, 31(8), pp.733~739 (2007), 한국항해항만학회
  16. 정현재, "한․중 간 Sea & Air 물동량 전망 및 활성화 방안에 관한 연구", 한국항해항만학회지, 36(10), pp.905~910 (2012), 한국항해항만학회[DOI]
  17. 동북아 육⋅해상 복합운송 확대방안 연구, "국토교통부", 국토교통부, ~ (2016)
  18. "중국 전자상거래 시장현황" (2020), 코트라 해외뉴스시장[URL]
  19. "K-stat", 한국무역협회[URL]
  20. 동북아 전자상거래 해상운송전환수요 분석, "한국해양수산개발원", 한국해양수산개발원, ~ (2017)
  21. "China’s crossborder e-commerce retail market forecast 2018-2021" (2018)[URL]
  22. Haezendonck, E., "Essays on Strategy Analysis for Seaports" (2001), Garant Publishers
  23. Hyndman, R. J, "Forecasting: principles and practice" (2018), OTexts
  24. Da Cruz, M. R. P., "A static and dynamic strategic portfolio analysis : The positioning of Iberian seaports", South African Journal of Business Management, 43, pp.33~44 (2012)
  25. 정태원, "A Study on the prospect of Sea & Air multi-transport in the perspective of international logistics environment", 한국항해항만학회지, 34(7), pp.587~594 (2010), 한국항해항만학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)