본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Study on Efficiency Evaluation of Yeosu⋅Gwangyang Port

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경영학

초록

Yeosu⋅Gwangyang port is considered as the 5th major port in Korea with Busan port, Incheon port, Ulsan port, andPyeongtaek⋅Dangjin port. With handling oil, ore, coal, and containers as the main items, the overall throughput ofYeosu⋅Gwangyang port has increased steadily. Yeosu⋅Gwangyang port has been propelling various strategies such asthe renovation of old terminals, rearrangement of container berths, and establishment of transportation network tostrengthen the port competitiveness. However, in the past 5 years, Yeosu⋅Gwangyang port has the highest shipcongestion rate among the 5 major ports in Korea. It indicated that there is an inefficient operation due to the facility ortechnology inadequate in Yeosu⋅Gwangyang port. Previous studies have mainly focused on deriving developmentstrategies for Yeosu⋅Gwangyang port. The studies that have analyzed the operational efficiency of Yeosu⋅Gwangyangport are insufficient. Therefore, in this study, to evaluate the port operation efficiency of Yeosu⋅Gwangyang port, agroup of competing ports was compared and analyzed by Entropy-DEA(Data Envelopment Analysis) model. Thecompeting ports were selected based on four major handling items (oil, ore, coal, and container) at Yeosu⋅Gwangyangport. According to the results, Yeosu⋅Gwangyang port had the best efficiency on oil terminal operating. The oreterminal, coal terminal, and container terminal showed inefficient results. In particular, it was analyzed that the efficiencyof the container terminal was the worst. It is necessary to establish strategies such as promotion of automation forcontainer terminals and marketing in consideration of regional characteristics. This study diagnosed the operation statusof Yeosu⋅Gwangyang port and could be utilized as a reference for establishing the development strategies forYeosu⋅Gwangyang port.

Abstract

Yeosu⋅Gwangyang port is considered as the 5th major port in Korea with Busan port, Incheon port, Ulsan port, andPyeongtaek⋅Dangjin port. With handling oil, ore, coal, and containers as the main items, the overall throughput ofYeosu⋅Gwangyang port has increased steadily. Yeosu⋅Gwangyang port has been propelling various strategies such asthe renovation of old terminals, rearrangement of container berths, and establishment of transportation network tostrengthen the port competitiveness. However, in the past 5 years, Yeosu⋅Gwangyang port has the highest shipcongestion rate among the 5 major ports in Korea. It indicated that there is an inefficient operation due to the facility ortechnology inadequate in Yeosu⋅Gwangyang port. Previous studies have mainly focused on deriving developmentstrategies for Yeosu⋅Gwangyang port. The studies that have analyzed the operational efficiency of Yeosu⋅Gwangyangport are insufficient. Therefore, in this study, to evaluate the port operation efficiency of Yeosu⋅Gwangyang port, agroup of competing ports was compared and analyzed by Entropy-DEA(Data Envelopment Analysis) model. Thecompeting ports were selected based on four major handling items (oil, ore, coal, and container) at Yeosu⋅Gwangyangport. According to the results, Yeosu⋅Gwangyang port had the best efficiency on oil terminal operating. The oreterminal, coal terminal, and container terminal showed inefficient results. In particular, it was analyzed that the efficiencyof the container terminal was the worst. It is necessary to establish strategies such as promotion of automation forcontainer terminals and marketing in consideration of regional characteristics. This study diagnosed the operation statusof Yeosu⋅Gwangyang port and could be utilized as a reference for establishing the development strategies forYeosu⋅Gwangyang port.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. 방희석, "주요 컨테이너항만의 효율성 분석에 관한 연구", 무역학회지, 36(2), pp.1~23 (2011), 한국무역학회
  2. Banker, R. D., "Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis", Management science, 30(9), pp.1078~1092 (1984)
  3. Charnes, A., "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units", European journal of operational research, 2(6), pp.429~444 (1978)
  4. 최성희, "광양항의 경쟁력 제고를 위한 비표준화 화물의 컨테이너화에 관한 연구", 한국항만경제학회지, 35(3), pp.93~108 (2019), 한국항만경제학회[DOI]
  5. Chung, Y. H., "An Empirical Study on the Efficiency of Korean Ports – Chiefly on the Application of DEA Technique", Journal of Corporation and Innovation, pp.55~79 (1997)
  6. Dan, L, "The efficiency measurement of coastal container terminals in China", Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 13(5), pp.10~15 (2013)
  7. 정봉현, "광양항의 경쟁력 평가요인과 강화전략", 한국항만경제학회지, 30(1), pp.119~142 (2014), 한국항만경제학회
  8. 정봉현, "녹색성장시대에 환경친화적 항만관리정책의 발전방향 - 광양항을 중심으로 -", 한국항만경제학회지, 25(3), pp.361~384 (2009), 한국항만경제학회
  9. 강현명, "항만 자동화 터미널의 효율성 분석 연구", 물류학회지, 29(5), pp.11~22 (2019), 한국물류학회[DOI]
  10. 김안호, "국내 무역항만의 효율성 변화분석:맴퀴스트접근", 한국항만경제학회지, 21(2), pp.173~188 (2005), 한국항만경제학회
  11. Kim, J. G., "A Study on the Evaluation of Port Competitiveness in International Shipping & Port Logistics : An Application of Hierarchical Fuzzy Process", Korean Journal of Logistics, 10(2), pp.37~69 (2002)
  12. 김삼열, "목포항의 효율성 및 생산성 분석에 관한 연구-DEA모형과 FCM을 결합분석법-", 한국항만경제학회지, 36(1), pp.183~196 (2020), 한국항만경제학회[DOI]
  13. 이홍훈, "여수‧광양항 정박지 개선방안에 관한 연구", 해양환경안전학회지, 23(1), pp.17~25 (2017), 해양환경안전학회[DOI]
  14. 임병학, "컨테이너항만 네트워크가 항만 생산성에 미치는 영향에 대한 연구: 사회 네트워크 분석을 중심으로", 로지스틱스연구, 19(3), pp.19~35 (2011), 한국로지스틱스학회[DOI]
  15. 모수원, "국내항만의 효율성 결정요소: 패널분석과 이분산 토빗모형을 이용하여", 한국항만경제학회지, 24(4), pp.349~361 (2008), 한국항만경제학회
  16. Mokhtar, K., "Efficiency of Operations in Container Terminals : A Frontier Method", European Journal of Business and Management, 5(2), pp.91~106 (2013)
  17. Oh, S. D., "A Method of Measuring the International Competitiveness of Container Ports : A DEA Approach, Focused on Productivity Analysis", Journal of Korea Port Economic Association, 17(1), pp.27~51 (2001)
  18. 박차미, "DEA-SBM을 이용한 국내 물류산업의 효율성 분석", 로지스틱스연구, 22(4), pp.27~46 (2014), 한국로지스틱스학회[DOI]
  19. 박길영, "컨테이너항만의 경쟁력 측정방법:AHP와 DEA접근", 한국항만경제학회지, 21(1), pp.133~151 (2005), 한국항만경제학회
  20. 박호, "Shannon's Entropy와 DEA를 결합한 효율성 분석 -세계 주요 20대 컨테이너항만을 대상으로-", 생산성연구: 국제융합학술지, 26(4), pp.193~214 (2012), 한국생산성학회[DOI]
  21. 박홍균, "환적화물의 컨테이너 터미널 효율성 분석", 한국항만경제학회지, 26(1), pp.1~19 (2010), 한국항만경제학회
  22. 박구웅, "동아시아‧유럽‧북미 컨테이너항만의 상대적 효율성 비교 분석", 한국항만경제학회지, 26(4), pp.219~246 (2010), 한국항만경제학회
  23. 경성림, "광양항의 항만물류배후단지 효율성과 경쟁력요인에 관한 연구 -입주기업단지를 중심으로-", 한국지역개발학회지, 25(1), pp.57~78 (2013), 한국지역개발학회
  24. Roll, Y., "Port performance comparison applying data envelopment analysis(DEA)", Maritime policy and Management, 20(2), pp.153~161 (1993)
  25. Ryu D. G., "A Study on Port valuation model and indicator development", Master, pp.2016
  26. 서정호, "국내 자동차부두 효율성 분석에 관한 연구", 한국항해항만학회지, 41(3), pp.127~136 (2017), 한국항해항만학회[DOI]
  27. 손용정, "SWOT", AHP 분석을 이용한 광양항의 발전 전략에 관한 연구, 2011, pp.27(1), 247~262[DOI]
  28. Sung, S. K., "The Transshipment Container Hub Strategy for Gwangyang Port", Korean Logistics Review, 18(2), pp.5~24 (2008)
  29. 왕관, "Evaluating Performance and Efficiency of Logistics in Chinese Provinces and Cities along the Belt and Road Initiative", 로지스틱스연구, 28(3), pp.13~26 (2020), 한국로지스틱스학회[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)