할당 공정성이 육군 공급사슬에 미치는 영향 연구: 비례할당 방식과 무작위할당 방식을 중심으로
The Allocation Fairness on Army Supply Chain: Focusing on Proportional and Random Allocation Method
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Recently, Fairness has emerged as an important factor in various fields of our society, and the need for research on the effect of fairness on Army supply chains that are difficult to estimate inventory shortage costs has been raised. therefore, The purpose of this study is to analyze how fairness affects the efficiency of the Army supply chain. To this end, a research model consisting of two divisions and one logistics support brigade supporting them was created to conduct experiments separated by proportional and random allocation methods, and simulations were conducted using system dynamics based on the results of the experiment. Experiments show that soldiers generally think the proportional allocation method is fairer, but the order quantity is 1.29 times greater than the random allocation method. As a result of reflecting this in the simulation, it was confirmed that the proportional allocation method was inefficient with more inventory than the random allocation method in terms of the inventory of the two divisions and the total cost of the supply chain. As a result, it was confirmed that the proportional allocation method only provides the misunderstanding of fairness and results in inefficiency of the supply chain. This study provides management implications and future research directions based on these results.
Abstract
Recently, Fairness has emerged as an important factor in various fields of our society, and the need for research on the effect of fairness on Army supply chains that are difficult to estimate inventory shortage costs has been raised. therefore, The purpose of this study is to analyze how fairness affects the efficiency of the Army supply chain. To this end, a research model consisting of two divisions and one logistics support brigade supporting them was created to conduct experiments separated by proportional and random allocation methods, and simulations were conducted using system dynamics based on the results of the experiment. Experiments show that soldiers generally think the proportional allocation method is fairer, but the order quantity is 1.29 times greater than the random allocation method. As a result of reflecting this in the simulation, it was confirmed that the proportional allocation method was inefficient with more inventory than the random allocation method in terms of the inventory of the two divisions and the total cost of the supply chain. As a result, it was confirmed that the proportional allocation method only provides the misunderstanding of fairness and results in inefficiency of the supply chain. This study provides management implications and future research directions based on these results.
참고문헌 (32)
- 김기찬, "Vensim을 활용한 system dynamics" (2014), 서울경제경영출판사
- 김종훈, "제약회사와 병원 간 공습사슬의 관계성과에 있어 분배와 절차 공정성 및 전환비용의 조절역할", 글로벌경영학회지, 18(3), pp.96~115 (2021), 글로벌경영학회
- 김태현, "개인 의사결정유형과 공급체인 동적특성간의 관련성에 관한 연구", 유통연구, 7(1), pp.87~103 (2002), 한국유통학회
- 김태현, "공급자의 할당규칙 대칭에 따른 공급체인 동태성에 관한 연구", 한국생산관리학회지, 14(1), pp.115~136 (2003), 한국생산관리학회
- 문성암, "해군 공급체인에서 주재고위치와 안전재고에 관한 연구", 로지스틱스연구, 14(1) (2006), 한국로지스틱스학회
- 문성암, "육군 공급사슬에서 이중채널 효과에 관한 연구", 로지스틱스연구, 19(3), pp.195~215 (2011), 한국로지스틱스학회[DOI]
- 문성암, "전시 육군탄약공급체인 설계에 관한 연구 : 긴급배송채널과 주재고위치를 중심으로", 한국SCM학회지, 12(1), pp.25~35 (2012), 한국SCM학회
- 박양규, "공급망에서의 윤리적 가치특성과 거래공정성 - 구매담당자의 비윤리적 의사결정이 거래공정성과 물류성과에 미치는 영향 -", 해운물류연구, 32(1), pp.111~137 (2016), 한국해운물류학회[DOI]
- 박찬권, "기업 간 거래의 공정성이 신뢰와 협력, 공급사슬 성과에 미치는 영향", 경영연구, 29(4), pp.343~380 (2014), 한국산업경영학회[DOI]
- 박찬권, "거래공정성, 거래진정성, 평판, 관계적 자본 간의 관계에 대한 연구", 물류학회지, 29(5), pp.35~48 (2019), 한국물류학회[DOI]
- 배석환, "분배적 공정성과 절차적 공정성이 공무원의 혁신행동에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 세대 간 차이가 미치는 조절효과를 중심으로", 한국정책연구, 21(4), pp.97~123 (2021), 경인행정학회[DOI]
- 이호, "할당방식이 해군함정 전투력에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 로지스틱스연구, 25(2), pp.57~74 (2017), 한국로지스틱스학회[DOI]
- 공정성에 관한 실태조사, "임상규", 한국행정연구원 사회조사센터, ~ (2012)
- 정종철, "MZ세대로 인한 인사 및 노사관계의 변화", 노동법률, 360(5월) (2021)[DOI]
- 한승희, "정당화 의무가 자원 할당 결정에 미치는 영향", 마케팅연구, 26(4), pp.59~75 (2011), 한국마케팅학회
- Berger, J., "Equity Theory: Toward a General Theory of Social Interaction" (1986), Messick
- Bertsimas. Dimitris., "The Price of Fairness", Operations Research, 59(1), pp.17~31 (2011)
- Brockner, J., "Procedural fairness, outcome favorability, and judgements of an authority’s responsibility", Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), pp.1657~1671 (2007)
- Ernst, Ricardo., "Allocation of warehouse inventory with electronic data interchange and fixed order intervals", European Journal of Operation Research, 103, pp.117~128 (1997)
- Feng Xu., "Statistical measurement of the inventory shortage cost", Journal of Applied Statistics, 44(4), pp.642~648 (2017)
- Folger, Robert., "Effects of Procedural and Distributive Justice on Reactions to Pay Raise Decisions", The Academy of Management Journal, 32(1), pp.115~130 (1989)
- GÉRARD P. CACHON, "An equilibrium analysis of linear, proportional and uniform allocation of scarce capacity", IIE Transactions, 31(9), pp.835~849 (1999)
- Greenberg, J., "Reactions to Procedural Injustice in Payment Distributions: Do the Means Justify the End?", Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, pp.55~61 (1987)
- Greenberg, J., "Organizational justice : Yesterday, today, and tomorrow", Journal of Management, 16, pp.399~432 (1990)
- Griffith, David A., "Social exchange in supply chain relationships: The resulting benefits of procedural and distributive justice", Journal of Operations Management, 24, pp.85~98 (2006)
- Hair, Joseph F., "A Primer on Partial Least Square Structural Equation Modeling" (2014), Sage Publications
- Homans, G. C., "Social Behavior : Its Elementary Forms" (1961), Harcourt, Brace, and World
- Hong-minh, S. M., "The dynamics of emergency transhipment supply chains", International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 30(9), pp.788~815 (2000)
- Khouja, M., "Optimizing inventory decisions in a multi-stage multi-customer supply chain", Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 39(3), pp.193~208 (2003)
- Leventhal, G. S., "Social exchange:Advances in theory and research", pp.27~55 (1980), Plenum Press
- Lind E., "The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice" (1988), Plenum
- Sterman, J. D., "Business Dynamics: System thinking and Modeling for complex world" (2000), Irwin McGraw-Hill