농업인들의 업무상질환 예방을 위한 우선순위에 대한 요구도
Demand for Priorities for Preventing Occupational Diseases among Farmers
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: This study was a preliminary study for the prevention programs for farmers' occupational diseases. It selected the priorities recognized by farmers, such as occupational diseases, and also identifies the effectiveness and feasibility of prevention programs among diseases recognized by farmers. Therefore, we plan to use it as basis data for future farmer safety and health programs. Method: The subjects of the study were farmers living in the region, selected through a snowball recruitment method, and a total of 671 people were targeted. The priority selection method was the Basic Priority Rating System (BPRS) method, and among the occupational diseases, programs to prevent musculoskeletal diseases, cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, and pesticide poisoning were surveyed on the effectiveness and feasibility of farmers. Results: Among occupational diseases, the highest priority was musculo-skeletal disease, followed by respiratory disease and pesticide poisoning. Among the programs for musculoskeletal disease, 'use of agricultural work convenience equipment and auxiliary tools' had the highest perceived effectiveness and feasibility. Among the five programs for pesticide poisoning, ‘equipment of protective equipment such as pesticide protective clothing/glove’ had the highest effectiveness at 67.4%, and ‘compliance with pesticide use instructions’ had the highest level of feasibility at 64.3%. Among the four programs to prevent respiratory diseases, ‘wearing a dust mask or gas mask’ was the highest at 65.5% in terms of both effectiveness and feasibility. Conclusion: When carrying out safety and health programs for farmers, the priorities recognized by farmers should be taken into consideration, and the program contents should also be developed taking into account the size of effect and feasibility recognized by farmers.
Abstract
Objective: This study was a preliminary study for the prevention programs for farmers' occupational diseases. It selected the priorities recognized by farmers, such as occupational diseases, and also identifies the effectiveness and feasibility of prevention programs among diseases recognized by farmers. Therefore, we plan to use it as basis data for future farmer safety and health programs. Method: The subjects of the study were farmers living in the region, selected through a snowball recruitment method, and a total of 671 people were targeted. The priority selection method was the Basic Priority Rating System (BPRS) method, and among the occupational diseases, programs to prevent musculoskeletal diseases, cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, and pesticide poisoning were surveyed on the effectiveness and feasibility of farmers. Results: Among occupational diseases, the highest priority was musculo-skeletal disease, followed by respiratory disease and pesticide poisoning. Among the programs for musculoskeletal disease, 'use of agricultural work convenience equipment and auxiliary tools' had the highest perceived effectiveness and feasibility. Among the five programs for pesticide poisoning, ‘equipment of protective equipment such as pesticide protective clothing/glove’ had the highest effectiveness at 67.4%, and ‘compliance with pesticide use instructions’ had the highest level of feasibility at 64.3%. Among the four programs to prevent respiratory diseases, ‘wearing a dust mask or gas mask’ was the highest at 65.5% in terms of both effectiveness and feasibility. Conclusion: When carrying out safety and health programs for farmers, the priorities recognized by farmers should be taken into consideration, and the program contents should also be developed taking into account the size of effect and feasibility recognized by farmers.
참고문헌 (21)
- "Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Survey 2022"[URL]
- "Ministry of Employment and Labor, Analysis of Industrial Accidents 2021"[URL]
- "Announcement of Farmer Occupational Disease Survey Results 2020"[URL]
- Sibbald SL, "Evaluating priority setting success in healthcare : a pilot study", BMC Health Serv Res, 10, pp.131~ (2010)
- Martin D, "A strategy to improve priority setting in health care institutions", Health Care Anal, 11(1), pp.59~68 (2003)
- Vilnius D, "A priority rating system for public health programs", Public Health Rep, 105(5), pp.463~470 (1990)
- Rudan I, "Evidence-based priority setting for health care and research : tools to support policy in maternal, neonatal, and child health in Africa", PLoS Med, 7(7), pp.e1000308~ (2010)
- Brownson RC, "Evidence-based public health" (2011), Oxford University Press
- "Simple Solutions: Ergonomics for Farm Workers"[URL]
- 이철갑, "농업인 근골격계질환", 대한의사협회지, 55(11), pp.1054~1062 (2012), 대한의사협회
- 조성학, "(Community Care Preparation) Identification of Musculoskeletal Problems for the Elderly in Rural Areas and Presentation of Regional and Inter-university Health Management Models", 대한물리치료학회지, 35(2), pp.37~42 (2023), 대한물리치료학회
- 권순찬, "일부 농업인에서의 근골격계 질환 관리 프로그램의 효과", 농촌의학.지역보건, 33(1), pp.1~10 (2008), 한국농촌의학.지역보건학회
- 박소연, "과수재배 농업인을 위한 건강증진 프로그램의 효과", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 14(8), pp.266~276 (2014), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
- Lee WJ, "Overview of pesticide poisoning in South Korea", J Rural Med, 4, pp.53~58 (2009)
- 이지영, "일부 농업인에서의 농약살포방식 및 보호구 착용에 따른유기인계 농약노출평가", 농약과학회지, 20(2), pp.172~180 (2016), 한국농약과학회[DOI]
- 이향석, "경기 일부지역 농업인의 급성농약중독 증상 유병률 및 직업성 위험요인", 농촌의학.지역보건, 40(4), pp.228~239 (2015), 한국농촌의학.지역보건학회[DOI]
- Dosemeci M, "A quantitative approach for estimating exposure to pesticides in the Agricultural Health Study", Ann Occup Hyg, 46(2), pp.245~260 (2002)
- Coble J, "Updated Algorithm for Estimation of Pesticide Exposure Intensity in the Agricultural Health Study", Int J Environ Res Public Health, 8(12), pp.4608~4622 (2011)
- Gomez MI, "Prevalence and predictors of respiratory symptoms among New York farmers and farm residents", Am J Ind Med, 46, pp.42~54 (2004)
- Frank AL, "Issues of agricultural safety and health", Annu Rev Public Health, 25, pp.225~245 (2004)
- 이현경, "유병 농업인의 호흡기계 질병 현황 및 영향요인", 한국지역사회생활과학회지, 31(4), pp.779~792 (2020), 한국지역사회생활과학회