본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

이러닝 설계에서 ‘IMS Learning Design’의 의의와 가능성에 관한 탐색적 연구

Exploring the meaning and possibility of ‘IMS Learning Design’ for e-learning design

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

본 연구는 ‘활동 중심’으로 이러닝을 설계하기 위해 교수설계 맥락에서 IMS Learning Design(IMS LD)을 검토하고 이것이 이러닝 설계에 주는 교육적 의의와 가능성을 살펴보는 것을 목적으로 한다. IMS GLC에서 개발한 학습활동의 표준인 IMS LD는 이러닝 환경에서 학습자가 특정한 학습목표를 성취할 수 있도록 ‘학습활동’, ‘학습자원’, ‘학습지원’ 등을 설계ㆍ개발하는 것을 도와주는 구체화된 언어이자 구조틀이다. IMS LD는 다양한 학습자의 역할을 설정하고 역할에 따라 서로 다른 학습활동을 수행할 수 있도록 지원하며, ‘속성’, ‘조건’, ‘공지’ 등의 기능을 활용하여 학습활동의 진행 과정에서 요구되는 교수자의 개입을 일정 부분 설계에 포함함으로써 이러닝 설계 영역을 수업 운영까지 확대하고, 적응적․협력적 이러닝의 가능성을 보여준다. 본 연구에서는 IMS LD에 기반한 이러닝 설계를 위하여 순서도, 청사진, 스토리보드 플랫폼과 같은 절차적 방안을 제안함으로써 학습활동 중심의 이러닝 설계가 어떻게 가능한가를 탐색적으로 보여주려고 하였다.

Abstract

The purposes of this research are to investigate the main points of ‘IMS Learning Design (IMS LD)’ and to suggest specific directions and procedures for e-learning design by the IMS LD specifications. IMS LD is an alternative standard for e-learning design with the focus of learning activity developed by IMS Global Learning Consortium and a structural framework or a meta-language that supports to design and develop the learning activities, learning resources and learning supports. According to IMS LD, learners participate in the multi-role teaching and learning process of the collaborative learning activities based on different pedagogical approaches. The functions of properties, conditions and notifications support the description of individualized learning design and lessen the engagement of instructors in process of learning activities. The implications of IMS LD in e-learning design are to expand the boundary of e-learning design from contents-oriented design to activity-oriented design and to suggest the possibilities of adaptive and collaborative e-learning. In order to specify and guide the design and development procedure and to help the communication between e-learning instructional designers and developers such as computer programmers, this study suggested the flowchart, blueprint, and storyboard platform for IMS LD in e-learning.

참고문헌 (49)

  1. 강명희, "e-러닝 콘텐츠 설계자 in: 미래를 생각하는 e-러닝 콘텐츠 설계", pp.2~49 (2006), 서현사
  2. 류지헌, "유비쿼터스 학습환경에서의 적응적 수업체제 적용을 위한 논의", 교육방법연구, 20(1), pp.75~91 (2008), 한국교육방법학회
  3. 손병길, "SCORM 기반 콘텐츠와 연계한 다양한 학습설계 지원기능 표준화 방안 연구(부록): IMS Learning Design 규격 기반 학습설계 표준화 방안 (KR 2007-16-별책)" (2007), 한국교육학술정보원
  4. 유영, "수업단계 기반 디지털교과서 활용 교수·학습 활동 분석 연구", 교육정보미디어연구, 14(4), pp.111~140 (2008), 한국교육정보미디어학회
  5. 이지연, "미국 대학의 이러닝 수업설계 사례를 중심으로 살펴본 교수설계자의 역할 탐구", 교육공학연구, 24(2), pp.129~151 (2008), 한국교육공학회
  6. 고등교육 e-러닝 현황 조사 분석 연구, "임병노", 한국교육학술정보원, ~, pp.KR 2006-24 (2006)
  7. 임철일, "상호작용적 웹기반 수업설계를 위한 종합적 실천의 탐색", 교육공학연구, 15(1), pp.3~24 (1999)
  8. 임철일, "교수설계이론" (2000), 교육과학사
  9. 임철일, "원격교육과 사이버교육의 이해" (2003), 교육과학사
  10. 이러닝 콘텐츠 패키징 표준 개발 연구, "정성무", 한국교육학술정보원, ~, pp.CR 2008-10 (2008)
  11. 정화영, "문항난이도를 이용한 웹 서비스 기반의적응적 이러닝 시스템", 인터넷정보학회논문지, 10(3), pp.151~157 (2009), 한국인터넷정보학회
  12. 조미헌, "e-learning 컨텐츠 설계" (2004), 교육과학사
  13. 한국전자거래진흥원, "2008 이러닝 산업실태조사" (2009), 지식경제부
  14. e-Learning 표준화 동향, "한태명", 한국교육학술정보원, ~, pp.RM 2002-27 (2002)
  15. IMS Korea, "포럼 활동현황", Retrieved December 21, 2009, from http:, www.defacto.or.kr, pp.cnf, forum[DOI]
  16. 제1회 IMS Korea 정기 세미나 -이러닝 2.0 및 글로벌 마켓 리더십 강화-, "IMS Korea", 한국교육학술정보원, ~, pp.RM 2008-7 (2008)
  17. ADL, "What is SCORM?", http:, www.adlnet.gov, ~
  18. ADL, "SCORM 2004 4th edition version 1.1 overview", http:, www.adlnet.gov, ~
  19. Agostinho, S, "A tool to evaluate the potential for an ICT-based learning design to foster “high-quality learning”. In Winds of change in the sea of learning. Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education", pp.29~38 (2002), UNITEC Institute of Technology
  20. Brown, A. R, "Elements of effective e-learning design", International review of research in open and distance learning, 1 (2005)
  21. Gagne,R.M, "The conditions of learning" (1965), Holt, Rinehart and Winston
  22. Horton,W, "Designing Web-Based Training" (2000), John Wiley
  23. Horton,W, "E-learning by design" (2006), Pfeiffer
  24. Hummel, H. G. K, "Educational modeling language: new challenges for instructional reusability and personalized learning", International Journal of Learning Technology,, 1, pp.111~126 (2004)
  25. IMS GLC, "Is Common Cartridge the same as SCORM? Wasn't SCORM supposed to solve this problem?", http:, www.imsglobal.org, pp.cc, ccfaqs.html[DOI]
  26. IMS LD, "IMS Learning Design Best Practice and Implementation Guide: Version 1.0 Final Specification" (2003), IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc
  27. IMS LD, "IMS Learning Design Informational Model: Version 1.0 Final Specification" (2003), IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc.
  28. IMS LD, "IMS Learning Design XML Binding: Version 1.0 Final Specification" (2003), IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc.
  29. Jonassen,D, "Design of constructivist learning environments. In Instructional design theories and models: Vol. 2. a new paradigm of instructional theory", pp.215~239 (1999), Indiana University, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  30. Koper,R, "An introduction to learning design. In Learning Design: A Handbook on Modelling and Delivering Networked Education and Training", pp.3~20 (2005), Springer-Verlag
  31. Koper,R, "Current Research in Learning Design", Educational Technology & Society, 9(1), pp.13~22 (2006)
  32. Koper, R, "Learning design: Concepts", http:, dspace.ou.nl, pp.handle, 1820[DOI]
  33. Koper, R, "Educational modelling language: modelling reusable, interoperable, rich and personalised units of learning", British Journal of Educational Technology,, 35(5), pp.537~551 (2004)
  34. Koper, R, "Representing the learning design of units of learning", Educational Technology & Society, 7(3), pp.97~111 (2004)
  35. Kurosu, M, "Micro-scenario database for substantializing the collaboration between human science and engineering human-computer interaction", Interaction Design and Usability, 4550, pp.140~145 (2007)
  36. Lim,C, "The current status and future prospects of corporate e-Learning in Korea", International review of research in open and distance learning, 8(1) (2007)
  37. Mager,R.F, "Preparing instructional objectives" (1962), Fearon Publishers
  38. Naidu,S, "Designing instruction for e-learning environment. In Handbook of distance education", pp.349~365 (2002), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc
  39. Oliver, R, "Teaching and learning online : a beginner's guide to e-learning and e-teaching in higher education", http:, web.me.com, pp.janherrington, ITC2009[DOI]
  40. Oliver, R, "Formalising the description of learning design", http:, elrond.scca.ecu.edu.au, pp.oliver, 2002[DOI]
  41. Reigeluth, C. M, "Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status" (1983), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  42. Reigeluth,C.M, "Instructional-design theories and models : Vol. 2. A new paradigm of instructional theory" (1999), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  43. Reigeluth, C. M., "Instructional-design theories and models : Vol. 3. Building a common knowledge base" (2009), Routledge
  44. Reiser, R. A., "Trends and issues in instructional design and technology" (2007), Merrill
  45. Seels, B, "Instructional technology: the definition and domains of the field" (1994), AECT
  46. Shute, V, "Adaptive e-learning", Educational psychologist, 38(2), pp.105~114 (2003)
  47. Smith, P. L, "Instructional design (2nd ed)" (1999), Merrill
  48. Watkinson,R, "75 e-Learning Activities: Making Online Learning Interactive" (2005), Pfeiffer
  49. Wiley,D.A, "The instructional use of learning objects. Bloomington" (2002), AECT

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)