眺望權 法理의 再檢討
A Review of the Prospect Right
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In Korea, Recognition of the prospect right and concerns on its protection have been increased according to improvement of standard of economic and cultural life. Disputes about prospect right has been also increased because new construction of residential-commercial complex building and rebuilding work at big cities are increasing. Nevertheless, concrete discussion about scope of legal protection of prospect right has not conducted. The prospect right means the right to take a view of fine scenery, such as mountain, river, the sea, park and a person whose prospect right has been violated by other’s building of some structures can legally claim for the protection of the right. The prospect right is the right to be able to look into the distance or see the scenery in the distance because the prospect means to look out the distance and to view, and the scenery to get the specific region. The prospect right avail to be able to see the agreeable and pleasant scenery. It is not clear that our law system recognize benefit of view as a right. But recently some scholars tends to recognized right to view as a subject of independent legal protection. The theme of this paper is to define the concept of the prospect right and review theory of the prospect right. There was established a law of view in protection from infringement in Korea lately. But the prospect right has been considered as reflective or living profit unlike right to sunshine and recognized as additional rights of right to sunshine. Japan’s many scholars and case law recognize benefit of view as a right. The right is based on need, duty, claim, rules. The need that rules make the prospect right is sufficient. We might treat it as a environmental rights. but mostly case law do not regard it as a right, it is wrong. The prospect right should be legally protected as a right. In this paper, I studied the case for the prospect right infringement from a law and proposed legislation ways through diverse theory. The purpose is to research in legal principles of prospect right infringement, to propose legislation ways from the legal bases of the civil law. All of fine scenery is not protected by the law, but to be legally protected, it should be objectively proved that the scenery has the value as benefit for living. If we admit the prospect right, we must scrutinize satisfying the required conditions. The person who has been damaged by illegal violation of prospect can claim the offender for prevention or removal of disturbance. This study is to seek method to ensure efficacy of legal protection of the prospect right by establishing legal principles.
Abstract
In Korea, Recognition of the prospect right and concerns on its protection have been increased according to improvement of standard of economic and cultural life. Disputes about prospect right has been also increased because new construction of residential-commercial complex building and rebuilding work at big cities are increasing. Nevertheless, concrete discussion about scope of legal protection of prospect right has not conducted. The prospect right means the right to take a view of fine scenery, such as mountain, river, the sea, park and a person whose prospect right has been violated by other’s building of some structures can legally claim for the protection of the right. The prospect right is the right to be able to look into the distance or see the scenery in the distance because the prospect means to look out the distance and to view, and the scenery to get the specific region. The prospect right avail to be able to see the agreeable and pleasant scenery. It is not clear that our law system recognize benefit of view as a right. But recently some scholars tends to recognized right to view as a subject of independent legal protection. The theme of this paper is to define the concept of the prospect right and review theory of the prospect right. There was established a law of view in protection from infringement in Korea lately. But the prospect right has been considered as reflective or living profit unlike right to sunshine and recognized as additional rights of right to sunshine. Japan’s many scholars and case law recognize benefit of view as a right. The right is based on need, duty, claim, rules. The need that rules make the prospect right is sufficient. We might treat it as a environmental rights. but mostly case law do not regard it as a right, it is wrong. The prospect right should be legally protected as a right. In this paper, I studied the case for the prospect right infringement from a law and proposed legislation ways through diverse theory. The purpose is to research in legal principles of prospect right infringement, to propose legislation ways from the legal bases of the civil law. All of fine scenery is not protected by the law, but to be legally protected, it should be objectively proved that the scenery has the value as benefit for living. If we admit the prospect right, we must scrutinize satisfying the required conditions. The person who has been damaged by illegal violation of prospect can claim the offender for prevention or removal of disturbance. This study is to seek method to ensure efficacy of legal protection of the prospect right by establishing legal principles.
참고문헌 (49)
- 강동규, "부산의 환경현황과 그 해결과제", 부산법조, 19 (2002)
- 곽윤직, "민법주해 제5권 물권(2)" (1996), 박영사
- 곽윤직, "민법주해 제18권 채권(11)" (2005), 박영사
- 구자훈, "외국 도시의 조망권 확보사례", 도시문제, 36(395) (2001)
- 권성, "조망권의 침해를 원인으로 한공사중지가처분, in 가처분의 연구" (2001), 박영사
- 金男旭, "러브호텔에 대한 建築規制", 토지공법연구, 16(1), pp.9~220 (2002), 한국토지공법학회
- 김남욱, "조망권에 대한 법적보장", 환경법연구, 31(3), pp.3~51 (2009), 한국환경법학회
- 김명길, "환경권의 실현을 위한 절차법제", 재산법연구 (1998)
- 김상용, "물권법" (2009), 화산미디어
- 김종보, "건축법상 일조권", 환경법연구, 23(2) (2001), 한국환경법학회
- 김종률, "조망권의 법적구성론", 법조, 559 (2003)
- 김종률, "환경침해에 대한 사법적 구제", 법학논총 (2002)
- 김형배, "민법학강의 제8판" (2009), 신조사
- 김홍균, "환경법" (2007), 홍문사
- 김홍균, "환경오염피해에 대한 사법적 구제의 효율성 제고방안", 인권과 정의, (294) (2001), 대한변호사협회
- 김철수, "헌법학(상)" (2008), 박영사
- 노회승, "조망권 침해에 관한 연구", 법학연구, (35), pp.143~161 (2009), 한국법학회
- 문광섭, "환경침해에 대한 유지청구, 환경법의 제문제", 재판자료, 94 (2002)
- 박균성, "행정법론(상) 제7판" (2008)
- 박균성, "환경법 제3판" (2008), 박영사
- 성락인, "헌법학 제10판" (2010), 법문사
- 손윤하, "환경침해와 민사소송" (2005), 청림출판
- 송오식, "환경오염과 사법적 구제", 비교사법, 5(2) (1998)
- 양창수, "독일민법전" (2005), 박영사
- 안경희, "眺望權에 대한 小考", 재산법연구, 23(2), pp.163~193 (2006), 한국재산법학회
- 오규식, "조망권의 의의와 특성", 도시문제, 36 (2001), 대한지방행정공제회
- 오세훈, "일조권에 관한 사법적 검토", 법정신문, ~ (1996)
- 윤의섭, "眺望權에 관한 再檢討", 성균관법학, 19(3), pp.581~604 (2007), 법학연구소
- 윤진수, "환경권 침해를 이유로 하는 유지청구의 허용여부", 대법원판례해설, 통권 : 23 (1995), 법원행정처
- 윤철홍, "환경이익침해에 관한 사법적 구제", 비교사법, 7(1) (2000)
- 이동원, "조망권 침해에 관한 판례의 동향", 법조, 54(10), pp.236~294 (2005), 법조협회
- 이영준, "물권법" (2009), 박영사
- 이용우, "공해방지소송, 재판자료 제2집, in 공해문제와 재판" (1979), 법원행정처
- 이재목, "조망권의 법적 근거와 보호 범위", 인권과 정의, (346), pp.29~53 (2005), 대한변호사협회
- 이태철, "조망권의 침해의 사법적 구제에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2006
- 李泰喆, "眺望權 侵害와 損害賠償請求- 대법원 2007. 6.28. 선고, 2004다54282 판결을 중심으로 -", 동아법학, (40), pp.189~215 (2007), 법학연구소
- 전경운, "일조권과 전망권에 관한 소고", 연세법학연구, 5(2) (1998)
- 전경운, "眺望權의 成立與否", 비교사법, 12(2), pp.1~34 (2005), 한국비교사법학회
- 전경운, "환경침해, in 주석민법 채권각칙(8)" (2000), 한국사법행정학회
- 전경운, "환경사법론" (2009), 집문당
- 정재헌, "공해의 사법적 구제", 사법연구자료, 6 (1972), 법원행정처
- 조은래, "조망권의 민사법적 보호에 관한 연구", 환경법연구, 26(1), pp.249~276 (2004), 한국환경법학회
- 지원림, "민법강의 제7판" (2009), 홍문사
- 허영, "한국헌법론 전정5판" (2009), 박영사
- 홍준형, "환경법" (2004), 박영사
- 淡路剛久, "環境法判例百選 No.171" (2004), 有斐閣
- 松村弓彦, "ロースクール環境法" (2007), 成文堂
- 阿部泰隆, "環境法" (2006), 有斐閣
- 大塚 直, "環境法, 第2版" (2008), 有斐閣
